Home Archives Random Quotes Latest Comments Top 100 Submit Quote Search Log In
1 2 3 4 5 6
Quote# 104189

When some people refuse to acknowledge the existence of hell it's because they are really afraid they might go there.

Jan B, Prepare To Go 34 Comments [10/19/2014 4:36:03 AM]
Fundie Index: 20
Submitted By: Chris
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 104187

The spectacular "blood moon" visible early Wednesday morning is not something atheists can explain, but Joel 2:31 in the Bible talks about the extraordinary phenomenon. What, "educated" atheists don't even know that there is a Book of Joel in the Bible??

Andy Schlafly, Conservapedia 34 Comments [10/19/2014 4:35:03 AM]
Fundie Index: 22
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 104179

imagine with me. whenever a woman is raped, every man within 20 miles of where the rape occurred is presumed to be a rapist, an accomplice, an egger-onner, an enabler, or completely disinterested (in protecting women from rape). they are all rounded up and jailed.

because it would be stressful for all women involved if there were any uncertainty regarding whether the men would be released or not — if the men were “coming home” or if they would ever again be “walking the streets to rape again” — to relieve womens stress, the answer would be NO, none of them will be released, ever. all the women would go on with their lives and never look back. there wouldnt be any prison-visits either. (feel the relief wash over you like a warm bath?)

if there was a problem of prison overcrowding (can you imagine the logistical problems we would encounter if we actually started punishing men for rape?) well thats easy — let all the newbies i mean “new fish” sleep in the recreational areas until a spot opens up. start a “communication initiative” whereby all prisoners would be given a new mont blanc pen and a letter opener and instructed to write letters to other prisoners around the country, like a pen-pal kind of thing. watch them all kill each other with the pens and letter openers. overcrowding? no longer an issue.


if we actually punished men for raping girls and women, without regard for fairness to men, and *only* caring about fairness to women and relieving womens stress, and centering womens survival as a sexual class, including the complete eradication of rapey males and rape culture, female separatism would no longer present the logistical problem it once did — “mens culture” would become prison culture. it already is, you see. under conditions of zero tolerance for men raping women, we would have “womens culture” and female separatism by default. it probably wouldnt take but a year at most for (nearly?) every single man to be rounded up and imprisoned for raping or contributing to the rape of a woman, if we actually punished men for rape, and contributing to rape.

thats literally all it would take to create female separatism: justice. thats all.

FCM, femonade 33 Comments [10/19/2014 4:30:46 AM]
Fundie Index: 21
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 104173

Last year it was the sodomite known as Ellen DeGeneras.. The carpet munching daytime Tv show host was asked for the 2nd time to host the Oscars, and accepted.

Now "NPH", otherwise known as Neil Patrick Harris is slated to host the Oscars this year.. The 'man' who puts new meaning to the word queer..

So, why would the Academy do this?.. Is it to be politically correct?.. Is it because the Academy and Hollywood are mostly made up of godless liberal cowards?.. Is it a social statement to show that America is accepting?

Personally, I think it's because queers can get away with saying what they want.. If someone speaks up about a joke or comment, they may be called the dreaded Anti-Gay.. The Academy is in essence hedging their bets.. DeGeneras was praised for being cute and doing a good job(typical).. NPH will be applauded by the mass liberal media as well.. Why?.. Easy, he's queer.. And nowadays in America.. That's simply all that matters..

Who I truly worry about in all this Satanic worship.. Is the youth of America.. Their minds are innocent, pure and fragile.. They don't need to be tainted or influenced by people who ruined their own lives and after lives.. As far as my kids go.. They know how wrong and evil it is.. And I strongly suggest fellow parents spread the message to your kids as well.. . God Bless.

american_champion_112212, IMDb 31 Comments [10/19/2014 4:29:02 AM]
Fundie Index: 14
Submitted By: Kevin Klawitter
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 104172

Homosexuals seldom openly admit that they want to sexually assault children, but their literature and their actions tell another story. In the January 1-8, 2001 issue of The Weekly Standard, author Mary Eberstadt exposed the clear link between homosexual activism and the growing North-American Man- Boy Love Association (NAMBLA) movement. Writing in “’Pedophilia Chic’ Reconsidered: The taboo against sex with children continues to erode,” Eberstadt notes:

The reason why the public is being urged to reconsider boy pedophilia is that this ‘question,’ settled though it may be in the opinions and laws of the rest of the country, is demonstrably not yet settled within certain parts of the gay rights movement. The more that movement has entered the mainstream, the more this ‘question’ has bubbled forth from that previously distant realm in the public square.

Eberstadt notes that the book, Male Inter-Generational Intimacy: Historical, Socio-Psychological, and Legal Perspectives edited by pedophile Edward Brongersma is currently available in the “gay/lesbian” sections of bookstores like Borders. This book, which openly promotes pedophilia, was first published in the Journal of Homosexuality in 1990. The Journal is edited by John DeCecco, a psychologist at San Francisco State University. DeCecco is a board member of the Dutch pedophile journal, Paidika.

The homosexual magazine Guide published a pro-pedophile editorial in its July, 1995 issue. In referring to pedophiles as “prophets” of sexual freedom, the Guide editorialist wrote: “We must listen to our prophets. Instead of fearing being labeled pedophiles, we must proudly proclaim that sex is good, including children’s sexuality. . . . Surrounded by pious moralists with deadening anti-sexual rules, we must be shameless rulebreakers, demonstrating our allegiance to a higher concept of love. We must do it for the children’s sake.”

Parents are correct to be concerned about homosexuals sexually assaulting their children. The Boy Scouts of America, for example, is right to prohibit homosexuals from membership or leadership positions. It is evident from the statistical evidence and news reports of child molestation cases, that homosexuals pose a clear and present danger to children. Our laws and social policies should protect children, not cater to the whims and sexual desires of sexual predators. We must oppose homosexual activism “for the children’s sake.”

David J. Stewart, Jesus Is Savior 43 Comments [10/18/2014 5:58:48 AM]
Fundie Index: 22
Submitted By: Randomosaur
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 104171




(Yes !! I SAID IT!! )






*********** iSRAEL AND THE VATiCAN REACH HISTORIC AGREEMENT granting the NEXT pope (the false prophet) an official seat in the room where the Last Supper is believed to have taken place, on Mount Zion in Jerusalem.**************

In this agreement, I just found out ……



If pope benedict xvi PRAYED TO ALLAH then the next pope will do it too http://voices.yahoo.com/pope-benedict-xvi-prays-allah-157108.html?cat=34

Muslims,and the vatican are now family http://www.nbcnews.com/id/22472790/ns/world_news-europe/t/vatican-plans-historic-catholic-muslim-meeting/

So this means Muslims, Christians, and catholics are now one accord??? WELP!!! Say your prayers people it is over!!!

CHRISTIAN WHISTLEBLOWER, Before Its News 44 Comments [10/18/2014 5:58:41 AM]
Fundie Index: 16
Submitted By: Denizen
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 104168

On his radio program today, Bryan Fischer made the case that the government can never endorse any position that is contrary to the will of God because government was established by God specifically for the purpose of carrying out his will, which is why gay marriage can never be legal. As Fischer explained, the entire idea of civil government came from God and therefore all earthly political and legal authority stems from God. As such, the purpose of civil government is to carry out the will of God, meaning that government can never remain neutral on moral issues. "God has called government to take sides in the culture war," Fischer said, "and God is instructing civil government to take the side of that which is right and good. That means government and those who hold government power have a divine responsibility to know the difference between good and evil so that they can reward the former and punish the latter." Thus, when government bans gay marriage, "it is doing a good thing," Fischer said. "It is doing a divinely ordained thing. It's doing its job. It's fulfilling its role as a minister of God"

Bryan Fischer, Right Wing Watch 26 Comments [10/18/2014 5:58:15 AM]
Fundie Index: 10
Submitted By: Giveitaday
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 104164

In a recent post I asked the question which came first--air or lungs, the heart or blood, etc.? Frankten Goethe (presumably a believer in Darwinian evolution) stepped up to the plate and answered each question, ending with "science has evidence for its answers."

Frankten believed that air came first. But if the air came first, where did it come from, and how was it that it had just the right amount of oxygen to sustain human life? While human lungs were evolving how did we breathe? Why did they evolve if life was already sustained without them?

Next he believed that our incredibly complex blood formed before the heart. Why did it do that, and how did it get around the body if there was no heart?

Frankten believed that male and female (for some reason) evolved at the same time, over time. They had to, because they needed each other to survive, as did each of the millions of species, each of which have male and female. Why and how did evolution cause these millions of different species to evolve as male and female, each with different (but corresponding) reproductive parts? How did they reproduce while these parts were supposedly evolving?

Next he believed that water evolved before thirst. We know that we can't live without water, so how did we (and the millions of animals) survive if we had no thirst?

Frankten also believed that food evolved before the stomach. So eggs, wheat, beef, cabbage, potatoes, tomatoes, apples, and a million and one other amazing foods evolved but we couldn't eat anything because the stomach hadn't evolved. Nor had our teeth, tongue, taste buds, epiglottis, esophagus, digestive juices, as well as small and large intestines.

I am amazed at how such an unthinking and unthinkable unproven and unprovable theory has survived for all these years, and that some have the gall to believe that it's even slightly scientific.

Genesis simply and plainly tells us that all creation was brought into being at once by the hand of Almighty God. A that's not a pleasant thought for sin-loving sinners.

Ray Comfort, Facebook 49 Comments [10/18/2014 5:55:30 AM]
Fundie Index: 19
Submitted By: Chris
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 104160

[Re. the Old Testament genocides]

1. For everyone has sinned; we all fall short of God's glorious standard.

2. Obey the LORD your God and follow his commands and decrees that I give you today.

Those two things are mentioned in the bible. If God tells you to slaughter, to love, who are you to say what is proper? For all you know those people were not even human! Think of all the stuff Noah and his family endured with the angels mixing with humans and beasts, think of that! I believe that when God orders the slaying of people, children, that they are abominations! There is no greater truth than God, and if God commands you to do something; it's for your own good or the people's good. Disobeying God's words resulted in death entering the world and caused people to struggle. Imagine what obeying God does to the world? God destroys the wicked, it says right there in the bible. Just because a child looks like a child, doesn't mean it is! Think about during Noah's flood. I'm sure some children looked normal at first and later were disfigured and became more monster looking (Nephilim).

Anonymous Coward, Godlike Productions 30 Comments [10/18/2014 5:49:57 AM]
Fundie Index: 8
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 104158

Darwinism is not only correctly called a theory, it even more correctly called an unscientific theory, a philosophical theory, in that it is not open to disproof by normal scientific means of measurement, observation, experimentation; and it makes no testable predictions. There is no such thing as ‘Darwin’s Law’ parallel to ‘Newton’s Law’ because Darwin makes no predictions of outcomes.

John C. Wright, John C. Wright's Journal 25 Comments [10/18/2014 5:49:40 AM]
Fundie Index: 11
Submitted By: David
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 104157

Will your END be Christian burial or pagan Druid cremation? The Holy Bible guarantees that everybody is going to die, except for a very, very small number who will still be alive when Christ returns. All the people alive today are just ONE HEARTBEAT from eternity . . . or the end of their world!


Christian burial prevailed in Great Britain until the beginning of the 20th century. The door was opened to Druid cremation by another deadly Druid named Charles Darwin. Darwin said that man was just an evolved beast . . . so why bother with burial . . . and just burn him like an animal when he dies.


MI6 Jessica Mitford opened the door to Druid cremation in the U.S.

Except for a very small minority, pagan Druid cremation was never accepted in the United States until the beginning of the ecumenical movement. Before Vatican II, cremation was actually forbidden to Latin Church members.


The U.S. has over 1,800 crematoriums!!

In the dogmatic Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX, modern civilization is completely condemned:

#80. The Roman Pontiff can, and ought to, reconcile himself, and come to terms with progress, liberalism and modern civilization.—Allocution "Jamdudum cernimus," March 18, 1861. (Condemned as error).

Modern crematoriums are one of the major exceptions to this rule. In the past, when Christians were publicly burned alive at the stake, it just produced more martyrs, as the people saw the cruelty and hypocrisy of the hierarchy.

Before Vatican Council II, only 2% of the U.S. population were cremated. After the publication of Jessica Mitford's book, the numbers soared. When most of the Latin Church monasteries closed, it looks like the monks found new occupations as undertakers!!

The largest number of death ovens are located in California and Florida.

Before Vatican Council II cremation was very, very rare in the U.S.

Now over 1,800 of these FINAL SOLUTION crematoriums exist, with the largest number located in California and Florida.

With all the advances in technology, cremating a body is still a slow process. Patents have been granted for mobile cremators that can pull up to your house and save you the trouble of a trip to the crematorium!!

It is beyond belief that "Jews" in the U.S. are not sounding the alarm night and day about these FINAL SOLUTION ovens.

This is even more bizarre because there is a Holocaust Museum in Washington City, and Houston, Texas!!

Why don't we find groups of concerned citizens picketing these crematoriums as they do abortion clinics? After all, abortion clinic babies are also cremated. This is all the more astonishing as the largest number of "Jews" in the world live in the United States.

Patrick Scrivener, Reformation 33 Comments [10/18/2014 5:49:18 AM]
Fundie Index: 12
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 104156

"All this business about goblins and jack-o'-lanterns all comes out of demonic rituals of the Druids and the people who lived in England at that particular time," Robertson said on the show.

He then suggested shifting the holiday toward a more Christian focus.

"I think churches can have Halloween parties," Robertson said. "You can bob for apples ... and turn it into a Christian festival, and that’s what we ought to do. We need to redeem these days, but that day was given over to Satanic things.”

Pat Robertson, Huffington Post 28 Comments [10/18/2014 5:48:55 AM]
Fundie Index: 2
Submitted By: Doubting Thomas
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 104155

Baptist Minister Ron Baity on a federal judge striking down gay marriage ban in North Carolina

“If you think for one skinny minute, God is going to stand idly by and allow this to go forward without repercussions, you better back up and rethink this situation,” Baity said in remarks transcribed by Raw Story. “I want you to understand, that is raw, pure blasphemy.”

Baity also drew comparisons between gay marriage and Sodom and Gomorrah, the cities destroyed by God in biblical stories.

"My friend, we are meriting, we are bringing the judgement of God on this nation as sure as Sodom and Gomorrah was destroyed, don’t be surprised at the plagues. Don’t be surprised at the judgement of God," Baity said. “You think Ebola is bad now, just wait. If it’s not that, it’s going to be something else. My friends, I want you to understand, you can’t thumb your nose at God, and God turn his head away without God getting your attention.”

Ron Baity, Huffington Post 23 Comments [10/18/2014 5:48:47 AM]
Fundie Index: 4
Submitted By: Doubting Thomas
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 104154

Forget the chicken and the egg--which came first, the air or the lungs, the heart or the blood, sleep or the night, male or the female, water or thirst, food or the stomach? Stop the confusion. Read Genesis again for the first time.

Ray Comfort, Facebook 21 Comments [10/18/2014 5:46:34 AM]
Fundie Index: 9
Submitted By: Nemo
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 104153

As I said at the beginning, the ability of people to deny the truth about something can be breathtaking. But what's at the heart of such denial? What stops a person from even beginning to think that a particular truth claim could be plausible?

This is obviously a complicated subject, but for many, it boils down to one simple thing: they don't want the matter in question to be true.

Stories are plentiful about people with cancer who ignored the clear warning signs on the side of cigarette packs and the physical symptoms they were experiencing, of young girls who were literally nine months pregnant and who wouldn't believe they were about to have a baby, and even of individuals like David Irving who stood up in a Canadian courtroom and testified: "No documents whatsoever show that a Holocaust has ever happened."[6]

The will to deny truth can be extraordinarily powerful.

When it comes to God, some atheists admit this is the obstacle they face. Thomas Nagel has written: "I want atheism to be true and am made uneasy by the fact that some of the most intelligent and well-informed people I know are religious believers. It isn't just that I don't believe in God and, naturally hope that I'm right in my belief. It's that I hope that there is no God! I don't want there to be a God; I don't want the universe to be like that."[7]

Could Christians be guilty of this — of wanting God to exist so badly they turn a blind eye to truth claims that run contrary to theirs? Of course. This is one reason Christian apologists beat their drum so loudly and call on all believers to critically examine facts as the Apostle Paul demands that we do (1 Thess. 5:21).

Robin Schumacher, Blogos 12 Comments [10/18/2014 5:46:15 AM]
Fundie Index: 4
Submitted By: Chris
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 104145

Combine disincentives to marry with incentives to not marry, and unsurprisingly, the result is half as much marriage. The solution is simple. End no-fault divorce. End asset-stripping. Ban the pill. Prosecute adultery and punish it with severe fines. Harshly slut-shame non-virginal women.

It will work. We know it works from history. But instead, societal decline, soft totalitarianism and feral children are preferred because women are short-sighted. Imagine what US society will be like when those rates fall to one in two.

Vox Day, Alpha Game 38 Comments [10/17/2014 3:12:58 AM]
Fundie Index: 29
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 104144

How are Christians the most persecuted?

According to the World Evangelical Alliance, over 200 million Christians in at least 60 countries are denied fundamental human rights solely because of their faith. David B. Barrett, Todd M. Johnson, and Peter F. Crossing in their 2009 report in the International Bulletin of Missionary Research (Vol. 33, No. 1: 32) estimate that approximately 176,000 Christians will have been martyred from mid-2008 to mid-2009. This, according to the authors, compares to 160,000 martyrs in mid-2000 and 34,400 at the beginning of the 20th century. If current trends continue, it is estimated that by 2025, an average of 210,000 Christians will be martyred annually. In the last two thousand years of Christian history, about 70 million faithful have given their lives for their faith.

How does this apply to me as an American Christian?

Even here in the United States many of us have sat quietly while our religious freedoms have slowly been taken away from us...We are not allowed to speak in the halls of academic science because Darwinism and Atheism are treated as the official religion. In the public schools we cannot teach or pray or sing about God because our children's minds belong to the state. If we celebrate our holidays in public places we are shut down because our judges have chosen to redefine the Constitution. We cannot speak openly in the media because of political correctness. The sanctity of marriage between a man and a woman is being challenged and we are under attack for defending it. We believe that America is "One Nation Under God" and we are hated for it. As Christians in America, we must stand up for the principles set forth in the First Amendment of our Constitution!

Jon McNaughton, McNaughton Fine Art 37 Comments [10/17/2014 3:12:35 AM]
Fundie Index: 17
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 104143

[This is the actual text of an email threat sent to various groups at Utah State University in response to Anita Sarkeesian planning to hold a conference there.]

This is a warning to all staff and students at Utah State University.

On Wednesday, October the 15th, a woman named Anita Sarkeesian is going to be speaking at the Taggart Student Center. This event is being organized by campus feminists at the Center for Women and Gender Studies.

If you do not cancel her talk, a Montreal Massacre style attack will be carried out against the attendees, as well as students and staff at the nearby Women's Center. I have at my disposal a semi-automatic rifle, multiple pistols, and a collection of pipe bombs. This will be the deadliest school shooting in American history and I'm giving you a chance to stop it.

You have 24 hours to cancel Sarkeesian's talk. You might be foolish enough to just beef up security at the event, but that won't save you. Even if they're able to stop me, there are plenty of feminists on campus who won't be able to defend themselves. One way or another, I'm going to make sure they die.

You've probably heard of a man named Marc Lepine. He was a hero to men everywhere for standing up to the toxic influence of feminism on Western masculinity. We live in a nation of emasculated cowards too afraid to challenge the vile, misandrist harpies who seek to destroy them. Feminism has taken over every facet of our society, and women like Sarkeesian want to punish us for even fantasizing about being men. This is why I've chosen to target her. Anita Sarkeesian is everything wrong with the feminist movement, and she is going to die screaming like the craven little whore that she is if you let her come to USU. I will write my manifesto in her spilled blood, and you will all bear witness to what feminist lies and poison have done to the men of America.

I am a student here. You will never find me, but you may all soon know my name. Feminists have ruined my life and I will have my revenge, for my sake and the sake of all the others they've wronged.

You have 24 hours. Use them well.

Anonymous, Standard Examiner 68 Comments [10/17/2014 3:10:27 AM]
Fundie Index: 26
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 104142

[OT: Why any man would want to get married these days is baffling!]

Marriages commonly end in divorce, and women initiate the divorce ~75% of the time. Women nearly always end up owning things after a divorce which they didn't pay for (i.e., legalized theft), in some cases, even things which were owned by the man prior to even marrying the woman (and not just minor things either, it could be a house, which is usually a person's most valuable possession). And, if there are children, women are usually awarded custody, and men are "awarded" child support payments, despite there being no mechanism in place to ensure the money is spent on the kids, and despite the father no longer having any real say in how the kids are raised. On top of that, you could even end up paying alimony (more legalized theft).

Then there are other bizarre possibilities, such as having to pay child support for a kid or kids that aren't even yours.

Marriage is an extremely risky gamble; one which can cost you hundreds of thousands or even millions of dollars and your kids if you lose, and which has no payoff if you "win" (other than getting to keep what you already have).

Marriage made sense at one time, but with the way things are now, I wouldn't even consider it. And there is nothing you can do that is guaranteed to protect yourself either, because there really is no such thing as an "ironclad" prenuptial agreement.

j-curl, IMDb 24 Comments [10/17/2014 2:59:40 AM]
Fundie Index: 2
Submitted By: Kevin Klawitter
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 104127

Putin and Russians know that in order to repopulate their homeland, they cannot allow sexual depravity.

They know that Muslims will over run their country if they do not start breeding, because Muslims themselves usually have large families.

HBO recently ran a documentary that illustrated that the people in general are even taking violent action to prevent the rainbow folks from coming out, and as is usual, this hit piece attacked this stance.

Before the fag bands of England came over to the US in the infamous British invasion of the 1960s, the US populace was completely intolerant of homosexuality, and the birth rate was solid with most adults married with children.

The onslaught of bisexuals John Lennon, Elton John, Mick Jagger, David Bowie, Freddie Mercury, etc... , and all that BS about free love has ushered in the current attitudes.

It is no coincidence that Roe vs. Wade occurred in 1973, when glitter rock dominated, and has resulted in over 50 million murdered babies, mostly all out of convenience.

The US is now a commie hell hole that leads the Western world in abortions, divorce rate, STDs, bastards, drug use, and folks in prison.

Guess that Starman waiting in the sky was just another space invader wishing to destroy Humanity. The music industry today is so damned perverse, it should be no surprise that necrophilia will be the next hip trend, which is still another good reason to be cremated.

jim, Real Jew News 30 Comments [10/17/2014 2:50:08 AM]
Fundie Index: 15
Submitted By: Wykked Wytch
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 104124

["You know that the fetus isn't a baby yet when it gets aborted right? It's a mindless ball of cells, like breaking an egg not stomping a chick.."]

You know that Anne Frank wasn’t an adult yet when the Nazis killed her, right? She didn’t have anywhere near the emotional or mental capabilities of a grown adult, or the experiences and wisdom of a senior. Comparatively speaking she was “underdeveloped,” so that must make what was done to her okay.

^ Satire, obviously. The death of Anne Frank was a tragic injustice, just like the 3,500 deaths that happen every day here in the US - the makings of a modern-day holocaust.

Stop the dehumanizing practice of comparing human beings to inanimate objects, and stop drawing arbitrary lines in other peoples’ worth based on their age and developmental capabilities. Nothing justifies killing innocent humans.

betterthanabortion, We Deserve Better 24 Comments [10/17/2014 2:49:10 AM]
Fundie Index: 7
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 104122

In yet another of his moronic rants, Drew Walker begins by challenging Obama’s “worthless, f*cking Muslim goat-raping *ss to lead this country the correct way.” He accused Obama of attempting to take away everything the founding fathers established, and further “challenged” the President to “follow the Constitution, to follow all amendments,” and do what he’s “supposed” to do, “seeing as how you claim you’re an American citizen.”

“Which is bullsh*t,” Walker adds. “It’s been proven time and time again where you’re really from. It’s been proven that your Social Security number belongs to a dead man.”

“So who the f*ck do you think you’re fooling now, Barack Obama — or should I say Barry Soetoro or [a series of clicking noises] your African f*cking native language,” the total “not-racist” said.

"We aren’t here to appease your f*cking Muslim beliefs. We aren’t here to pffh-ugh appease your f*cking African beliefs. We are here to believe in our American Constitution,” Walker said. “Our freedoms. Our liberties. And that’s goddammit what I f*cking support,” Walker continued. “Not you, you piece of sh*t.”
“Obama,” he added, “You are nothing. NOTHING! I can’t even compare you to anything because you are nothing. You’re the lowest form of a f*cking human, and I don’t believe you’re human. I know you’re f*cking old lady’s a goddamn sasquatch.”

“So f*ck you,” he sagely added. “Just get the f*ck out of our country.”

“Walker explained that “us patriots have had enough. You don’t like it? Come visit me personally Obama. We can settle this like men. But I know that you’re too much of a c*nt to do that, you little f*cking peter-puffing f*ggot.”

“Go f*ck your man-wife you piece of sh*t,” Walker concluded.

Drew Walker, Americans Against the Tea Party 34 Comments [10/17/2014 2:48:48 AM]
Fundie Index: 11
Submitted By: Yossarian Lives
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 104119

You either defend and support the West, which Israel is part of, or you support the east, which is muslim and anti-civilization. If you support and defend the fakestinians, you are anti-civilization and an enemy of the West. There is no longer room for middle ground. There are no crimes against the bloody muslim savages of Gaza and the West Bank, it is called warfare and frankly I fault the Israeli's for half azzing it. Time for a modern day Carthage and call it a day, then you will have peace.

Drakken, The Daily Princetonian 20 Comments [10/17/2014 2:45:56 AM]
Fundie Index: 7
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 104117

(referring to the article on Wikipedia about the geocentric model)

I found this article on Wikipedia and noticed it had misinformation in regards to the Bible, and tried to edit it, but the "free-thinkers" on Wikipedia wouldn't allow a pro-Bible viewpoint, so here it is on my website with minor changes that permit the Bible to speak. I won't say I'm a strong advocate of Geocentrism, but I am open to the idea. I also don't see any issue with the Heliocentric model either. The Bible is compatible with either position. Mainstream science is unsure on which position is correct, and some believe both positions are equally valid with arguments to support either theory. Although Heliocentrism is a generally accepted theory by a majority for our universe, it is not proven.

Brian Price, Valueoftruth.org 23 Comments [10/17/2014 2:44:43 AM]
Fundie Index: 14
Submitted By: Chris
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 104114

Not all viruses are equal. Ebola is one that brings on particularly gruesome symptoms, hence the extra fear associated with it. So if all viruses are created and controlled by God, why did He decide to make some of them so nasty? Because we humans are such a pompous lot, we think that we can do life without God’s help. We refuse to acknowledge our need for Him. Well, if we’ve got it so handled, why are the fatalities of the Ebola virus continuing to climb? If we are so in control, why are months ticking by with no arrest to the spread of this thing? In the news, you’ll find a lot of logical reasons given. For example, there aren’t enough medical supplies and personnel in the area that is getting hit so hard. Well, why not? What’s with the poverty and uneven spread of resources in this world? If we’re such a capable lot, why can’t we learn to share and help each other? If we’re so brilliant on our own, why can’t we contain this thing? We complain that trying to track down all the people who might have come in contact with an infected person is tedious work. But why is it so tedious? Because we’re such wimps, that’s why. We have to constantly sleep and eat or we can’t function. We get fatigued easily. We get annoyed easily. When we’re in tense situations, we get extra huffy and we do sloppy work. We fight with each other and we let things slip through the cracks. And while we’re busy holding conferences and bickering and disregarding safety rules, more of us keep getting sick. At what point will we realize that we’re in over our heads and look to God for help?

Medical supplies and personnel are just a fraction of our problems. We’re selfish little punks who are far too prideful to admit that we have neither the brains nor the resources to stop something that God has started. After all, if we were really as capable as we pretend, none of us would ever get sick. By now we would have found a way to kill off the whole family of Ebola critters. But instead, we’re scrambling to try and come up with some kind of medication that will reverse the symptoms. God is in our laboratories with us, whispering ideas into our minds and controlling how successful our efforts are. But if He should give us an effective cure for this particular disease, will we give Him the glory? No, we’ll pat ourselves on the back. Then God will call upon another one of His viral soldiers to scare us back into an awareness of our limitations.

Anna Diehl, The Pursuit of God 24 Comments [10/17/2014 2:44:05 AM]
Fundie Index: 6
Submitted By: Chris
WTF?! || meh
1 2 3 4 5 6