Major Admin Announcement
Home Archives Random Quotes Latest Comments Top 100 Submit Quote Search Community Log In
1 2 3 4 5 8
Quote# 121750



[...]

Various media reported that Nye had a great concern that the Ark Encounter (and the Creation Museum and Answers in Genesis ministry) will adversely influence children.

Isn’t it amazing, 1) considering all the ardently evolutionary museums across America and around the world, 2) recognizing that evolution is taught as fact to millions of students in the public schools (in the United States and across the globe), and 3) noting all the evolutionary programs on TV and articles in magazines and so on, that secularists like Bill Nye are greatly fearing one Creation Museum and now one Ark?

The secular arguments about origins and earth history are easily demolished. Thus secularists have to censor creation science beliefs from our schools. They fear they may easily lose people to creationist arguments.

Watch some of the most captivating and eye-opening video segments of my Ark tour with Mr. Nye in this recent blog post.

We have been blessed to have received many great testimonies from guests visiting the Ark Encounter in just its first week. Here is one that greatly encouraged me, and it came from a pastor: "[T]he Holy Spirit was strong in that place. I stayed choked up for the first two levels. The longer I stayed and the more I saw, the more I thought on the Word of God and what Christ did for us—I could hardly talk!"

Ken Ham, Answers in Genesis 29 Comments [9/23/2016 5:33:50 AM]
Fundie Index: 12
Submitted By: Chris
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 121749

(Regarding 100 Iraqi refugees moved to Flint, Michigan)

Allowing an invasion of non-assimilating people into America is like introducing an evasive species into an ecosystem. This is exactly liberals' intent, to engage in biological/genetic and cultural warfare against the natives.

mtl1, City-Data 38 Comments [9/23/2016 5:20:51 AM]
Fundie Index: 13
Submitted By: ScrappyB
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 121748

(On the Brock Turner case)

Why can't I blame the victim for showing a complete lack of commonsense? Was he the first man to ever take advantage of a woman's inebriated state? There have been these situations for as long as there has been human beings consuming alcohol. Stop coddling these victims. They do need to take responsibility and not put themselves in vulnerable situations.

That young man's reputation is ruined for the rest of his life. He is now permanently on the sex offenders list. And no matter what he ends up doing for work, he will never get any endorsement deals or become top management for any company. He will be a pariah wherever he goes.

I think that you are jealous of this boy's previous status as a "golden boy". You are jealous that he was smart enough to get into Stanford and could have had the perfect life... shrug.

Had she been my daughter, I would be mad at her for going to a college party and getting so drunk. And when I was going to Brown University in the late 1970's, I knew better than to go to the keg parties at the frat houses. And I also, know that any compliments from a man at a party like that or at a night club was more an effort to get into my pants than actually wanting to get into a relationship with me and become my boyfriend or husband. I was also able to get backstage at many rock concerts in the 1980's. And since I stayed sober and drug-free at these gatherings, and no one ever tried to sexually assault me.

And back to chaperones... well the human brain isn't fully developed until the age of 25. The frontal cortex is the last to develop and that where the decision making process is. And it's why males before the age of 25 have such high auto insurance rates. Young men are prone to making bad impulsive decisions. Add to that, men are just more sexually motivated creatures than women. That's just a fact of life.

Miu, City-Data 33 Comments [9/23/2016 5:20:42 AM]
Fundie Index: 12
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 121747

I will therefore that the younger women marry, bear children, guide the house, give none occasion to the adversary to speak reproachfully” (I Tim. 5:14). (Preteen and teenage young women who have reached puberty and are having sex without being married do give occasion for the adversary to speak reproachfully about them, and is fornication, sin, which causes fornicators to go to Hell.1 If they get abortions, this is murder. Murderers cannot enter Heaven!2)

What is a young woman? GOD’S commandment, if a woman desires to be married, would be at the age of puberty. Webster’s definition of “puberty” is: “the age when one becomes capable to bear children, which is marked by maturing of the reproductive organs, with the onset of menstruation in the female; the period at which sexual maturity is reached. The age of puberty varies in different climates and environments, being from thirteen to sixteen in boys and from twelve to fourteen in girls, and is commonly designated legally as fourteen for boys and twelve for girls.” Webster’s Dictionary states “childhood” is the “state or time of being a child; state or time from birth or infancy to puberty or maturity.”

Tony Alamo, www.alamoministries.com 19 Comments [9/23/2016 5:20:36 AM]
Fundie Index: 7
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 121746

The taboo of all taboos, as far as our society is concerned, is that of adults engaging in specific sexual activity with children. We recognize that even people who consider themselves open-minded about sexuality might come down on us pretty hard for raising this issue.
Are we discussing these things in order to find justification for adult-child sexual activity? The reader will have to make up his or her own mind as to our motives. We are not raising this issue to offend anyone or to propose such activity, but it is critical to remember that we discussed earlier the difficulty of drawing a clear line between childhood and adulthood from a cultural/historical point of view. We then pointed out that in reality children are sexual adults at puberty.
It must also be said that in older cultures, before children began to be regarded as excessively fragile and in need of a kind of care that has reached pampering stages in our culture, sex between "adults" and "children" was not at all uncommon. Marriages between very young girls and much older men have been common throughout history in many cultures. I say this without passing any particular value judgment on the wisdom of such unions.
It should also be noted that both religious and social rules and laws on this issue are culturally conditioned and not God-given. Among all the sex laws of the Old Testament, for example, so far as I know there is not even one on the subject of what we would call adult-child sex.
Is the whole religious, social and legal pattern, which so severely stigmatizes adult/child sex, really an improvement on the patterns of the past? We might wonder in the light of the practices of other cultures and the silence of the Scriptures.

Bill Paris, www.libchrist.com 19 Comments [9/23/2016 4:00:33 AM]
Fundie Index: 6
Submitted By: PETF
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 121744

Homosexuality practically causes mankind to have sexual lust over everyone and everthing in existence. (Genesis ch.19, Leviticus ch.18-20, Romans ch.1 Jude ch.1) Such immorality hurts children the most. Exposure to homosexuality is a child-abuse, since innocence is children's universal human rights. Jesus cursed those who hurt children. The Westerners got quite lost this century by applying racial equality upon sexual immorality. Racism is an average defect among mankind but the inclination to Sodomy is abnormal even among the pagans. The West should stop forcing Sodomy upon the nations or upon the children; it's so suicidal in every way. Western Liberals are well-dressed savages. The Westerners need to read the Holy Bible to become civilized again and to provide safety to their children. And the Western Church should never submit to the Sodomic atheists. It's a treason against King Jesus. (Revelation ch. 2-3)

Grace Kim Kwon, Christian News Network 21 Comments [9/23/2016 3:59:54 AM]
Fundie Index: 7
Submitted By: Jocasta
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 121742

I am glad you asked that. I am betting that Trump will win by a land slide 370. I am still losing ten cents on that bet, but I look at the primary where Trump was the underdog and he still won by a substantial amount. Right now I am ahead $14.05 on Trump. I am actually ahead 20 cents on Connecticut. People were so sure that he could not win in Conn that I was able to get that for pennys. I could make 10 times on that. For every dollar I could make 10. I attended a high school there in that state for two years. So I thought I would bet for old time sake. Conn is really tied in with New York so it would be almost unheard of that Trump could take that state. If anyone anywhere does not like Trump it is NYC. "A prophet is not without honor except in his own town, among his relatives and in his own home." Mark 6:4

joshua 1 9, Christian Forums 18 Comments [9/23/2016 3:59:45 AM]
Fundie Index: 5
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 121740

A month after suggesting Hillary Clinton could be attacked by “Second Amendment people,” Donald Trump used similar language during a campaign rally on Friday, The Guardian reported.

Speaking in Florida, Trump accused Clinton of wanting to “abolish” the Second Amendment, then criticized her for traveling with armed Secret Service bodyguards.

“I think that her bodyguards should drop all weapons – they should disarm,” he said. “I think they should disarm immediately, what do you think, yes? Take their guns away, she doesn’t want guns. Take their guns away, Let’s see what happens to her.”

Donald Trump, Raw Story 32 Comments [9/22/2016 6:11:05 PM]
Fundie Index: 10
Submitted By: Demon Duck of Doom
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 121737

My own, Biblical understanding jjohnjil is that at least two of these gigantic clouds of dynamic energy merged together and because they were much denser at their centres they created the first law in science...those cores were forced to find the central position of these merging electrical clouds. The first universal Hadron collider came into existence as these cores hurtled towards each other and smashed headlong, one into the other...Now science can really begin because a number of behaviour patterns would simultaneously take place...Powerful shock waves spreading out from that collision point in space would send all other surrounding clouds hurtling outwards as science says they do now, and each one would be spinning up into a violent hurricane force with many tornadoes forming within them.

Science, as we now know it, is just one step away...but Almighty God got there first.

NicholasMarks, Religion and Ethics 15 Comments [9/22/2016 6:06:20 PM]
Fundie Index: 11
Submitted By: Nearly Sane
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 121736

Cheating whores should be humiliated in front of the whole planet. IMO adultery should be illegal, and the consequences should be even worse for females. If more conservative incels and normies are against methods like torture, rape, execution, prison (15 years), solitary confinement (7 years) and staggering financial punishment (20K-60K), then I have a new way of punishment that does not require prison, nor money nor physical harm.

Women that cheat should be taken by the police and forced to take off their clothes. The policemen now should proceed to take photos and videos of them in order to post them on social media with hashtags like # Cheating Whore and # I Broke My Family. That way, those females would feel a fraction of the humiliation felt by her husband/BF when she cheated.

BrokenIndigoCrayons, Reddit - /r/Incels 41 Comments [9/22/2016 6:06:17 PM]
Fundie Index: 17
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 121735

Stay AWAY from my children Hillary!

You, and all of your body doubles, clones, and whatever other sick conspiracy stuff the government is involved in and seems to be testing out on you as of late; using you as their first human guinea pig.

One of you is one too many. A million of you would cause the planet to immediately implode.

Then to think they might start doing the same DNA clone stuff with Obama, with other leftist loonies, with people like the Kardashian's, Justin Bieber, and Miley Cyrus...

tiffanybw, Rapture Ready 38 Comments [9/22/2016 5:59:46 PM]
Fundie Index: 15
Submitted By: solomongrundy
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 121730

Misconception 1: I have an inferiority complex

I’ve gotten this hurled at me so many times that it’s time to address this once and for all. I do not have an inferiority complex with regards to whites. I am their equal, morally and intellectually. I firmly reject racism because I sincerely believe in the equality of all men. This is a composite belief that is comprised of several fundamental beliefs, chief amoung which is the existence of God (The Abrahamic God, ie the only true God). We are all equal in His eyes. Genuine racists believe that certain groups are inherently superior or inferior depending on the group’s contribution to civilization over time. I do not share this belief. I believe all people are inherently equal in worth regardless of how much or how little their respective groups have contributed to the pool of human knowledge. This is my personal belief .

Having said this, I don’t believe that all cultures are equal. God created man, but not culture. Culture is man-made and synthetic works vary in quality. Just because we are all equal doesn’t mean that racially diverse groups can live together in some sort of leftist utopia. Racially diverse societies will only endure within the cultural hegemony of one dominant group. Certain cultural values are so alien to others such that forcing diverse groups who practice these cultures to reside in close proximity constitutes an act of cruelty. Respecting borders is about respecting culture. The act of erecting a border sends a clear message to one’s neighbours that they are free to practice their way of life in their corner of the world, free from persecution and judgement, just as one is entitled to the same prerogatives within one’s own borders.

Misconception 2: Whites are inherently special

I never said that whites were somehow special on account of their genetics or nature. I’ve always stated that Western culture is unique and ought to be preserved. The only way this can be done is to ensure that they remain a majority in their own nations. If you wish for America and Canada to continue being great, then it is logical to ensure that the people who created these nations continue running them. Why is this view so outlandish? If China is to remain Chinese, then shouldn’t the Chinese be the majority there? So why can’t whites be a majority in the US and Canada?

Misconception 3: Non-whites are incapable of altruism

"All groups are capable of both hospitality and savagery if the conditions are right. I think Dota is really overgeneralizing. There are many parts of the third world where one will be treated with the utmost hospitality and some will will give you the shirt off their back."

I never said that non-whites were completely devoid of altruistic instincts. I have seen individual acts of kindness in South and South East Asia, and even the Middle East. The point I was trying to make is that Western society is humane. The compassion one encounters in the West is collectively organized. You won’t see things like homeless shelters and soup kitchens in non western countries. You’ll never see an Indian or Chinese equivalent of the YMCA and other organizations that exist solely to improve quality of life. This is insaniyat on a scale that is unimaginable in the non-western world.

The second point I wish to make is that while while many non-westerners are kind and hospitable to tourists, how hospitable would they be if those tourists remained and became citizens? I’ve read numerous accounts by Black tourists who have spoken glowingly about Korean courtesy. How courteous would these Koreans be if blacks were 20% of their population? How would they react when Blacks made a move on their women?

Bay Area Guy is essentially correct when he says that kindness to tourists comes easily since they are merely passing through. The US and Canada allow non-whites to settle in their nations and even grant them access to their highest institutions. Yet despite these gestures, they get nothing but grievance mongering and endless whining from minorities.

Misconception 4: White values will survive white extinction

"Also many non-whites born and raised in America have the same sort of outlook on hospitality and civility that whites do."

What Tulio writes is true, but he underestimates the power of tribalism on non-whites and I don’t blame him. Liberalism provides a most effective cover for tribalism as the Jews have demonstrated and as non-whites have themselves discovered. It allows them to cloak their group interests under universalist terms like “egalitarianism” and “tolerance” knowing fully well the effect that moral universalism has on whites. The true test of a group’s liberalism lies in how they behave not when they are a minority, but when they are a majority. So while the Jew and Indian eloquently argue for tolerance and inclusion in North America, they seldom practice those virtues in India and Israel where they are in charge.

Tulio also fails to realize that democracy and and tribalism are incompatible on the most fundamental level. That tribal interests reduce democracy to nothing but vote bank politics. It is completely ludicrous to think that Indians, Chinese, Koreans, Blacks, and Hispanics will somehow see beyond their racial identities and embrace each other as fellow Americans. Hell, every university in North America has a plethora of ethnic and religious associations that that reflect the demographic composition of their student body.

Would Indians, who so fiercely resist affirmative action favouring Dalits back home, somehow show blacks more compassion? Would Hispanics overlook racial identity when fiercely competing with blacks for blue collar jobs? A racially diverse America where groups compete fiercely for scarce resources (thanks to a declining economy) will not produce a very humane society. This has been said before but it needs to be said again: A first world nation cannot be sustained by a third world population.

Dota, Occident invicta 15 Comments [9/22/2016 3:24:25 PM]
Fundie Index: 6
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 121729

You would be racist if you said that the West African’s endurance makes his life inherently more valuable than the life of the European. The West African is just as equally made in God’s image as the European is. But this doesn’t mean the two people can live in the same nation when there are so many fundamental differences between them. If the West African chooses to live with the European so that he can enjoy the latter’s way of life, he must remain a minority. That’s all I’m saying.

Dota , Occident invicta 10 Comments [9/22/2016 3:24:10 PM]
Fundie Index: 5
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 121728

It’s true that whites today are decadent and degenerate. But even in this pitiful state of atrophy, Western culture is still more compassionate and less dysfunctional than most cultures in the non western world.

Dota , Occident invicta 11 Comments [9/22/2016 3:23:57 PM]
Fundie Index: 5
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 121722

“Fight Song” Will Lose The Fight!!

I’ve heard this song that is used by the homosexual movement for “empowerment” to their God-hating cause. It makes me cringe how the singer uses lyrics so blatantly against God and morals. In other words she’s saying nothing can change her mind and she’ll do what she wants to do, and will even fight for it, thus spitting in the face of the Almighty. Well, let me tell you God-haters, you and this person and all who reject Christ will one day soon stand naked before God, and you’ll have no cloak (covering) for your sin. Sound like I’m talking Bible? Yep, you’re right. I sure am. Somebody’s got to take a stand for God!!

...

Here’s the song’s lyrics:


Like a small boat
On the ocean
Sending big waves
Into motion
Like how a single word
Can make a heart open
I might only have one match
But I can make an explosion (right there begins the rebellion against God)

And all those things I didn’t say
Wrecking balls inside my brain (the Devil will torture your mind)
I will scream them loud tonight (Satan wants you to scream and carry on like a demon possessed maniac, but God speaks in the still, small voice)
Can you hear my voice this time? (Satan will also drive you and scream in your ear to do what he wants, which is rebel, disobey, live how you want, etc., but he pays in counterfeit money and will NEVER show you the consequences!)

This is my fight song
Take back my life song (You think you can run your life, but it’s GOD Who allows you to keep breathing)
Prove I’m alright song (You’re not all right, in God’s eyes you’re all WRONG!!)

My power’s turned on
Starting right now I’ll be strong (Strong, standing for what? AIDS?? HIV?? REALLY??)
I’ll play my fight song (you’re fighting against the most powerful Being in creation)
And I don’t really care if nobody else believes (Well, GOD cares, and so will you when you stand before Him having to give account of your life to Him)
‘Cause I’ve still got a lot of fight left in me (You may now, but your day is coming and you won’t have any fight left then)

Losing friends and I’m chasing sleep
Everybody’s worried about me
In too deep
Say I’m in too deep in too deep
And it’s been two years I miss my home
But there’s a fire burning in my bones
Still believe
Yeah, I still believe (yeah, believe (falsely) that you can get away with shaking your fist at God)


Then it goes on to repeat itself with its meaningless mantra of “got a lot of fight left in me,” blah blah blah, etc, etc. Gimme a break. This trash should be OUTLAWED!! But it WILL ONE DAY, when KING JESUS comes back and purges this cursed world with FIRE!!

kingjameswriter1965, I Hate The Internet But I Love Jesus 29 Comments [9/22/2016 2:45:26 AM]
Fundie Index: 13
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 121720

I am gladly homophobic and so is the Lord Jesus Christ! The Bible says that John laid his head against the bosom (chest) of Jesus. They could share that admirable closeness of manly friendship because they KNEW THAT THEY WEREN'T HOMOSEXUALS. If John had been a professed homosexual, I GUARANTEE you that the Lord would not have chosen to become close friends like that with John. Check the Bible and you'll find that Jesus was not a companion of riotous men and reprobates.

David J. Stewart, Jesus is Savior 33 Comments [9/22/2016 2:45:10 AM]
Fundie Index: 12
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 121717

BrokenIndigoCrayons recently made a thread entitled "95% of female newborns should be blinded by doctors" and I have to confess that I agree with him.

Usually that's the point where normies show up to "debate" us. They want to refute our "arguments" and react surprised when we accuse them of attacking us, "I'm not attacking or belittling you, we're just having a discussion".

But there is no debate to be had:

* I don't want to be laughed at.
* I don't want to be looked at with disgust.
* I don't want to be compared to Chad.
* I don't want to be afraid to go out in public.
* I don't want women to see me.

All of that (and some more) can be summed up in the sentence "Women should be blinded at birth".

These feelings are real. They are not up for discussion. You don't get to tell me what my lived experience is. You don't get to tell me how I am allowed to feel.

Arguing that me not wanting women to see me is not real, that me not wanting women to see me is not true, that me not wanting women to see me makes me a horrible person is not ok. There is no "just having a discussion", you are attacking and belittling me at every step of your stupid "arguments".

Are normies really so delusional that they cannot see how they are reinterpreting an expression of vulnerability and emotion as some kind of proposal for political action that must be debated and stopped? Don't they recognize that every step of these strawman discussions is about denying our incel experience?

Most of the "discussion" on this subreddit involves one person laying out their hurt and feelings while another person does his or her best to invalidate them one by one in the spirit of what he or she either believes or at least pretends to be believe to be a reasoned discussion. That's not how successful communication works.


PorphyriosMalik, Reddit - /r/Incels 71 Comments [9/22/2016 2:44:28 AM]
Fundie Index: 25
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 121716



Christian Soldiers - UKIP, The Mirror 19 Comments [9/22/2016 2:43:14 AM]
Fundie Index: 18
Submitted By: Yossarian Lives
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 121715

Of course you can't cus it doesn't exist. That doesn't mean it is wrong it means that I have to decide how I will publish it...and quite honestly I'm not too impressed with your scientific institutions...who tell you everything came from nothing.

Perhaps it might be best to slowly introduce it to those who need that knowledge most...and, of course, the righteous, who are living that science here and now.

It doesn't take too much logic to realise that our only currently known resistance to gravity is our muscular strength so that the constant down force will play havoc with the human body if that uplift counter pressure is lost and in many cases of ill health, it is. This is why it is important to upbuild within us a righteous spirit exactly how Jesus taught...then...maybe...we too will walk on water...though I don't recommend it.


NicholasMark, Religion and Ethics 13 Comments [9/22/2016 2:43:03 AM]
Fundie Index: 11
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 121714

[In an article about how Ark Encounter was being "misrepresented."]

Rosenau implied that every sign at the Ark contains scientific errors, but there are plenty of wayfinding signs that are scientifically accurate. That is, the exit signs identify the exits and the restroom signs direct people to the restrooms.

Tim Chaffey, Answers in Genesis 32 Comments [9/22/2016 2:43:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 7
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 121713

The insidious power of metaphors

Thanks to the hateful campaign to demonize Brock Turner as a rapist, I think I better understand how sexual hysterias work. Firstly, it needs to be pointed out that Brock Turner is not actually a rapist, even by the legal definition in California:

http://www.independent.co.uk/voices/stanford-rape-case-brock-turner-victims-statement-a7074246.html

He is guilty of digital penetration, and not even a violent one at that; just taking advantage of the woman's intoxicated state. So why are people so absurdly hysterical about this minor sexual assault? Why do they demand to punish it as if it were rape? I disagree that it should be criminal at all, since the woman got drunk willingly and went along with it, but even if you agree with the law, it was far removed from rape.

I think people react to the metaphor rather than reality. Feminist propaganda has been so successful that "sexual assault" is now synonymous with "rape" in the mind of the mob, and so rape is all they can see in their imagination. It was recently shown that the meaning of words are stored in the same place in the brain across individuals:

http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v532/n7600/abs/nature17637.html

Feminists have managed to hijack the semantic mapping of "rape" and meld it with "sexual assault," so now all it takes to create mass hysteria is to accuse sexual assault. This is also how statutory rape works, and how feminists have even managed the absurd feat of creating the concept of female rapists and female sex offenders. These are all about metaphors, and metaphors are all you need to create lynch mobs and criminal convictions alike, after legal reforms which are also based on metaphors rather than reality.

Because the meanings of words have so extreme consequences when they are enshrined in criminal law, and even when they aren't, it is important not to let the metaphors get out of hand. One thing we need to make absolutely clear is that rape can only be performed with a penis. A real penis. Brock Turner didn't use his penis -- just his fingers -- and women by definition don't have penises so they can't be rapists. If you don't see this, then you are in thrall of metaphors rather than reality and need to break the spell. And we need to turn back the feminist legal reforms which have already so unreasonably expanded the definition of rape in many jurisdiction.

Eivind Berge, Eivind Berge's blog 22 Comments [9/22/2016 2:42:54 AM]
Fundie Index: 9
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 121712

God authorizes bigotry, sheep rebel . . .

On November 5, 2015 the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (Mormon Church) issued a new and extreme anti-gay edict banning same-sex married couples and their children from the Church. During the past 10 months, there have been scores of Mormon LGBT teenagers who have committed suicide because of it.


Mormon Apostle Dallin H. Oaks made matters worse when he said of the dozens of Mormon teen suicides, “I’m aware that those tragic things happen. Those things have to be judged by a higher authority than exists on this earth.”


It became a PR disaster for the Mormon Church. In the months to follow the policy change, so many Mormon families were hurting that Church leaders finally issued a rare acknowledgement on all of the suicides. The Church owned Deseret News covered it with this headline “LDS Church Leaders Mourn Reported Deaths in Mormon LGBT Community.”

On January 10, 2016 the Mormon Church did an about face. Apostle Russell M. Nelson said in a speech at Church owned BYU Hawaii that it was not actually a policy change, but the LGBT ban came directly from God. That hard to swallow bit of damage control two months after the original Church edict led to tens of thousands of more Mormon resignations.(bold not in original)

Church members started going online, talking to their Bishops and lining up by the thousands to fill out the necessary paperwork to officially leave their Church. One estimate is that up to 125,000 Mormons have resigned the Mormon Church in the last 10 months because of it. One attorney in Salt Lake City has personally handled 12,000 resignations alone. This figure is on top of the nearly one million Mormons who have resigned the Church after the it was outed as being the driving force and funder of California’s Proposition 8.


Russell M. Nelson , huffington post 13 Comments [9/22/2016 2:42:26 AM]
Fundie Index: 5
Submitted By: Mister Spak
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 121711

This is a hilarious attempt to demonized the alt-right for the very things you apparently idolize being done by the lunatic left. Nice try. You could replace all of the references to alt-right in your article with LBGTQ, BLM, or Occupy Wallstreet and come to the same conclusions about those organizations. All you've really done is make an extremely weak and lame attempt to legitimize the lunatic leftist groups at the expense of one on the other side of the pendulum swing.

jwobstj, Wired 18 Comments [9/21/2016 6:05:06 PM]
Fundie Index: 4
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 121710


Hi Sweet Pea…Thank you for your very kind greeting and thank you for the opportunity to speak civilly on my Biblically discovered ‘dynamic energy’ of such vital importance. You see, science is looking at it all wrong. They have all the facts and the mechanics but they are putting it together all wrong.

It is all very complicated and I try to make it as simple as possible but even that isn’t simple enough…but it is all supported by Jesus’ accurate teaching so there is no need to understand what I say, we just need to follow Jesus Christ accurately.

NicholasMarks, Religion and Ethics 11 Comments [9/21/2016 6:05:01 PM]
Fundie Index: 12
Submitted By: Nearly Sane
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 121706

This is a public service announcement after someone today tried to make me feel guilty for laughing about Hillary Clinton's health issues. Is it poor taste to relish the thought that Hillary Clinton has a debilitating medical condition? No. Always remember this about Hillary Clinton:

1) She thinks you are deplorable and unsalvageable anti-American garbage that would love to silence you in any way possible.

2) She wants to flood the country with people that hate your guts and want you to pay for the honor of it all.

3) She advocates for every anti-white, anti-male, and especially every anti-white male policy she can.

4) She destabilized the Middle East resulting in pointless American deaths and flooding Europe with "refugees" that kill, rape, rob, bomb, run over, and destroy European culture and heritage.

5) She leads groups of SJWs to harass and destroy careers of honest people with legitimate concerns about the country.

6) She advocates for the petty grievances of legitimately shot criminal black elements while ignoring rampant black on white violence that happens every day.

7) She brings forward any and all ideas that weaken traditional families and culture that built America into a once great nation.

8) She is a corrupt thief that used her power and influence for pay for play schemes that enriched her at the expense of ordinary American citizens at every turn.

9) She represents the globalist snake that is swallowing the West whole.

Do not feel pity for this woman and, more importantly, don't let anyone make you feel pity for her. She hates your guts and will have no sympathy for anyone that opposes her.

I don't give a s**t about her and it does no good to pretend to. Remember who she is and what she represents. Put the pressure on and keep dropping negative news about Hillary wherever possible. People are affected by it. It's working and in fact it may be making Hillary that much worse by getting into her and her staff's heads as well.

AutisticSubhuman, Reddit - /r/The_Donald 24 Comments [9/21/2016 6:04:51 PM]
Fundie Index: 8
WTF?! || meh
1 2 3 4 5 8