Home Archives Random Quotes Latest Comments Top 100 Submit Quote Search Log In
1 2 3 4 5 8
Quote# 104312

Homosexuals cluster meaning they promote each other secretly.

Use the law against this clustering. Where there is a clustering of homosexuals, use the law to break them up. Such clusters are prima facie evidence of discrimination against heterosexuals.

Use anti-discrimination laws against homosexuals everywhere in the workplace including courts.

Expose, do not be afraid to out homosexuals at every opportunity. “Are you homosexual?” Try not to use the word ‘gay’. That is part of the deceit in the movement. When your usage of the word ‘homosexual’ is taken as an indication of your opposition, use ‘same-sex’ as a replacement but do not use ‘gay’.

“Do you have a same-sex lifestyle? A same-sex partner>”

“Are you in support of Churches being required by law to marry same-sex partners?”

And so on. Find out and record who is homosexual and count their numbers. They should not number more than 2% of the people in your workplace and your community organizations.

hostage, Free Republic 27 Comments [10/25/2014 7:20:50 AM]
Fundie Index: 6
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 104310

(Conclusion to a blog post on the topic of lesbian/bi celebrities)

So what is it with these young women?

- A chaotic home life?
- A dearth of masculine young men?
- Feminism pushing young women into competitive and masculine roles, where they clash with young men, both the feminized ones, and those standing their ground and refusing to give in easily to a woman-centric environment?
- Black men, unavailable, either through their dropping out of society, their criminality, or their immaturity?
- Men refusing marriage, for fear of repercussions by feminism, and feminist women and wives?
- Men refusing to mature, and instead delaying marriage and family?
- The culture pushing, through mass media, that marriage is not necessary?
- Divorce rates, and divorce costs, high, especially (uniquely?) for men, so many opting out of marriage?
The "otherness" of the other becoming too much to deal with for young people these days, who are not used to natural competitions, and eventually some awe for differences.
- The desire by contemporary people to make everyone the same, to avoid this natural alienness or otherness of people?
- The desire to make everything "nice" and non-combative?

In any case, this "best friend" type of coupling is well suited for girls in college and high school. Under normal conditions, these girls will find staunch mothers or grandmothers who will diminish that seductive environment, give them the education they need, and place them in situations where they can lead a normal life, including building their future families.

The women I've described above are traumatized orphans, both in society and in family. They have been dealt with difficult beginnings. Since their families didn't come through for them, then it should have been up to the larger society to see that they didn't normalize their ambiguities and abnormalities. Now, as adults, they are seeped in their iniquities, and will only further terrorize society. Our job now is to see that they don't do that, and that they don't amass more vulnerable innocents along their way.

Kidist Asrat, Reclaiming Beauty 9 Comments [10/25/2014 7:20:27 AM]
Fundie Index: 4
Submitted By: ConcernedCultist
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 104309

*On a review of a documentary about "incels"*

Look, I'm not even gonna bother debunking this bullshit article, I'm just gonna say what I've always said and move along. This isn't a matter of entitlement, nor was it ever. Feminists need to get it through their thick skulls that men need sex, and without it, our minds start deteriorating. Feminism's reorganization of society has left a large part of the male population (and they are a large part, otherwise you wouldn't be hearing about them) unable to find willing sex partners. This is a problem, and since feminism is now the prevailing ideology, they must find a way to fix it. Otherwise, stuff like the Santa Barbara shooting will keep happening.

It's as simple as that really, you created this problem, now you must find a solution for it. You can kill us, give us the sex we need, or anything else, but you need to do something. Men don't simply "suffer quietly", it's against our nature, and no amount of lecturing about "entitlement" can change that. If we feel we've been wronged somehow, we'll react, some of us by lashing out on the Internet, others by lashing out in RL. The point is simply ignoring the problem and hoping it goes away isn't an option.

Faulkner, The Agony Booth 29 Comments [10/25/2014 5:55:14 AM]
Fundie Index: 8
Submitted By: Ultimate Paragon
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 104306

(Commenting on an article asking if Christians are willing to go to jail for their beliefs)

No religious group on earth has ever faced persecution like we Christians do today. I will serve time for the Lord, but it's a shame that I will have to.

Billy Christian, WND 25 Comments [10/25/2014 5:53:59 AM]
Fundie Index: 14
Submitted By: PhillipaFry
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 104305

["The first part of your article contains the shortest, and worst definition of theory i’ve ever read, and the whole concept of supposed unbiased writing goes straight downhill from t here"]

Folks, this is a perfect example how scientists manipulate the meaning of things to confuse you. They refuse to abide by logic and reason. They thereby convolute everything they lay their hands on to confuse and distort in order to better lie and treat you like idiots. In other words, first they change the meaning of theory to mean what they want it to mean. Then, they fabricate lies and call them facts because they want to dazzle rich folks with their ‘knowledge’ and ‘discoveries’ so these poor snobs can fund their ‘research’ and pay their salary. Something as simple as ‘show us the mutants’ that are in the process of becoming fully evolved and yet they can’t do it. Instead, they contort their way through a false paradigm and demand you bow to them.

["1) You’re right, it’s “just a theory.” Like the “theory of gravity” and the “germ theory of disease.” And we all know how wrong they are, right?

2) Look, unless you can acknowledge that the scientific use of the word “theory” is not the same as its colloquial use, then your whole argument is disingenuous. You’re equivocating. You’re lying to your readers. How desperate must you be?"

1) “You’re RIGHT”! Yeah! Slowly they’re coming around. Anyway, it’s Newton’s LAW of gravity but the other theories are just that, theories. Germ theory has many detractors such as Antoine Bechamp. Booya!

2)You’re the desperate one going on tangent and throwing red herrings because the whole article is about how there’s no proof of actual monkey/man mutants running around and you can’t provide said proof.

Biblicism Institute, Biblicism Institute 15 Comments [10/25/2014 5:53:46 AM]
Fundie Index: 11
Submitted By: Night Jaguar
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 104301

[Raven-Symoné Tells Oprah Winfrey: "I Don't Want to Be Labeled Gay,"]

OK, I will not label you gay. But I will label you a decadent, vile, God-denying, twisted, pestilential, wicked, disgusting, noxious sexual deviant and sodomite. Homosexuality is an abomination and that aptly describes you, missy. I prefer to reserve the word "gay" for what it really means before the pink Nazis corrupted it.

re_nortex, FreeRepublic 14 Comments [10/25/2014 5:51:22 AM]
Fundie Index: 8
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 104300

In your worldview, aren't your wife and children merely non-designed chemical accidents, like motor oil? Isn't love just a chemical reaction in your brain, no different in principle than hate? If someone else decided to hate his wife and children and brutally torture them, do you think that would be morally wrong? And if so, how can you justify your belief

Jason Lisle, Jason Lisle's blog 23 Comments [10/25/2014 5:05:17 AM]
Fundie Index: 6
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 104299

Israel was reborn in the New World wilderness in 1620

The tiny remnant of Israel left England in July 1620, determined to plant the Tabernacle of David in the New World wilderness:

And to the woman was given two wings of a great eagle, that she might fly into the wilderness, into her place, where she is nourished for a time, and times, and half a time, from the face of the serpent (Revelation 12:14).

Jesuit King James I bribed the captain of the Mayflower to drop them off 400 miles north of their intended destination. He "prayed" that the wilderness would swallow them up and he would be rid of religious "malcontents" as he called them.

In 1620, a little ship called the Mayflower carried 102 Christians from the corrupt old world to the New World.

As with Noah and his family, it was to be a new beginning for the human race.

This event is remembered yearly in November at the holiday called Thanksgiving.

The little Tabernacle of David in the wilderness was not safe even 3,000 miles from Europe. The Jesuits and the Babylonian "Jews" followed them and set up spying stations in Newport, Rhode Island, New York City, and Charleston, South Carolina.

None of the puny efforts of lying and corrupt men could foil the plans of the Almighty or prevent the reestablishment of Israel:

After this I will return and will rebuild the tabernacle of David which has fallen down; I will rebuild its ruins, and I will set it up; so that the rest of mankind may seek JEHOVAH, even all the nations who are called by my name (Acts 15:16-17).

It can be said without any contradiction that Saint Martin Luther is the true founder of the United States of Israel!!

Patrick Scrivener, Reformation 14 Comments [10/25/2014 5:05:09 AM]
Fundie Index: 8
Submitted By: Yossarian Lives
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 104291

Last week on his talk radio program, Michael Savage got into an argument with a caller over whether California lawmakers should rename a San Francisco tunnel in honor of Robin Williams. The caller, who said he was a veteran suffering from post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), defended the move, while Savage objected to the plan, claiming that it would promote suicide.

After a lengthy argument, Savage hung up on the caller and proceeded to attack him. “I am so sick and tired with everyone with their complaints about PTSD, depression. Everyone wants their hand held and a check, a government check. What, are you the only generation that had PTSD? The only generation that’s depressed?”

He then blamed America’s problems on those who “cry like a little baby” over depression: “If the whole nation is told, ‘boo-hoo-hoo, come and get a medication, come and get treatment, talk about mental illness,’ you know what you wind up with? You wind up with Obama in the White House and lawyers in every phase of the government, that’s what you wind up with. It’s a weak, sick nation. A weak, sick, broken nation.”

Savage continued that veterans with PTSD are a “bunch of losers” and recommended that they be more like Michael Savage.

“You need men like me to save the country,” he said. “You need men to stand up and say stop crying like a baby over everything.” He continued that “men are so weak and so narcissistic” that it is “no wonder ISIS can defeat our military.”

Michael Savage, Right Wing Watch 61 Comments [10/24/2014 3:22:40 AM]
Fundie Index: 42
Submitted By: Giveitaday
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 104286

After drawing criticism for a Facebook calling same-sex couples “gremlins,” a GOP candidate from South Carolina reaffirmed his position on marriage equality.

Anthony Culler, who is challenging Rep. James Clyburn (D-SC), set off a firestorm Monday with a Facebook post warning, “If you believe in traditional families and that marriage is defined as an institution between one man and one woman then I ask that you start acting like it and START VOTING like it! Do not buy the “cuteness” and “What will it hurt?” arguments whispered in your ears and marketed to our children. Same-sex couples that seek to destroy our way of life and the institution of marriage are NOT cute and cuddly but rather (for those of you that are old enough to remember the movie), Gremlins that will only destroy our way of life.”

But Culler did not back down in response to the backlash. In a new Facebook video released Monday, Culler repeatedly referred to same-sex couples as gremlins.

“I made a comment that same-sex couples that want to destroy traditional marriage and our way of life, they’re gremlins,” he explained. “They’re these creatures that are so destructive.

“No matter how many gremlins there are across this country, we here in the sixth district will stand against it,” he vowed.

Earlier this month, the Supreme Court guaranteed marriage equality in a number of states, including South Carolina, when it announced that it would not hear marriage cases from states where federal appeals courts already declared same-sex marriages constitutional. Days after the announcement, South Carolina’s Supreme Court postponed same-sex marriages until a federal judge is officially bound to follow the Virginia precedent. But marriage equality in the Palmetto State is inevitable.

Anthony Culler, Think Progress 25 Comments [10/24/2014 3:13:44 AM]
Fundie Index: 9
Submitted By: Kevin Klawitter
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 104285

Many of us were conned into thinking that modern liberalism is about giving females the right to choose when they have sex. If they want to be sluts, that is their choice. If they want to be chaste until they are married and then remain faithful to their husbands, that is fine too. If at any given time they make bad choices, they can learn from their mistakes so in the end everyone is happy.

In fact, in practice nothing could be further from the truth. Liberalism in the context of modern society effectively imposes a wartime mass-rape situation on females, albeit by relatively subtle means.

Here is how the process works. Females derive virtually all their social status by virtue of their perceived sexual desirability. It follows that they will gain status by being associated with males of high sexual status and lose status by being associated with males of low sexual status. Therefore, over time, all females will gravitate to wanting to be sexually associated with a small percentage of males of high sexual status. As an aside, the males of high sexual status will largely be stupid assholes, given that they have high reproductive fitness in the context of modern society, as I explain in this thread.

It follows that every high status male will have several females pursuing him in order to derive social status by the interaction. Over time this means the males will feel inclined to demand immediate sex, since they will know that if one female doesn't give it up, another will. They will then be inclined to up the ante even further, demanding the most degrading sex acts that the Internet can cause them to come up with. In order to have any sexual status at all, which is to say in order to have any status at all, the females will have to play along.

Now, it is not within the female psyche to willingly forgo status and become a social outcast. This is not an option to the overwhelming majority of them. Therefore, once this process is in motion, they are simply along for the ride. They might have planned to be a virgin bride. They might hate every minute of every sex act they consent to. But if they need to do it to fit in, they will.

Hence Western females find themselves in a similar position to German females in 1945, when dim-witted Russian peasants were going around raping everyone in sight (or perhaps they have it a bit worse, given the suggestibility of Internet porn and their complicity in the process). What heavy artillery achieved then, liberalism backed by the resources of the state has achieved now. Effectively the females are being raped, not so much by the dirtbags sticking their dicks and what have you into their various orifices, but by the system and the sadistic animals behind it.

Well done libtards. This is the future you have bequeathed your daughters. If they do not currently have NO CHOICE but to submit to sex acts the likes of which you have never even dreamed of being performed on them by shitbags with retard-level IQs, then that soon will be their situation. Your values in action.

Cornfed,  CoAlpha Reactionary Forum 34 Comments [10/24/2014 3:10:11 AM]
Fundie Index: 16
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 104281

Television has become so evil, raunchy and sexually suggestive. FoxNews has been featuring slutty whores, lying with their miniskirts all the way up, posing like Playboy centerfolds throughout their news broadcasts. FoxNews is promoting sexual immorality!!! They act like right-wing conservatives; but in reality, Sean Hannity, Ann Coulter and Bill O'Reilly are professionally paid liars who create controlled opposition. It's all part of the Illuminati's game of deception, to divide and conquer the American public. A house divided cannot stand. America's true powers are Masonic, just down the street from The White House. Sadly, the average person is so woefully ignorant and lazy that they won't read beyond the daily news being spoon-fed to them. The masses of society don't think for themselves, so the media thinks for them instead. To see Ozzy Osbourne's shameful and potty-mouthed wife featured as the main center of attraction on television is disturbing to say the least. These are evil, Christ-rejecting, wicked, bums in God's eyes!

The unsaved, Godless and wicked world honors fools. They praise the wicked. They call evil good and good evil. They call right wrong and wrong right. I don't have TV and don't want it, but it's everywhere we go in society today. People are hooked into the TV like a life-support system. Prices are going up on everything except giant flat-panel coloured televisions! The Devil wants everyone to have a big television, so you won't miss any spiritual indoctrination by the Devil and having your moral values corrupted. The Bible warns us in our text verse not to have fools as our companions. The Today Show are fools. The women all wear mini-skirts, which is sinful. God commands women to dress in modest apparel which shows the type of behavior a woman possess. Your clothing speaks volumes about your character. A woman who wears a miniskirt is telling the world that she has low morals. In fact, the very exposing of her thighs is an immoral act!!!

David J. Stewart, Jesus is Precious 39 Comments [10/24/2014 3:08:55 AM]
Fundie Index: 10
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 104279

(When asked how atheists will react when we allegedly see Jesus when we die)

With Horror, see how these atheist concern themselves with this? interesting how they concern themselves with issues they do not believe exist and then brainwash themselves with their revisionist history by claiming falsely that we are-effecting their lives, Awwee Boo Hoo Hoo, cry babies, the lot of them,

If God does not exist, then NEITHER do any of their reasons for being here, except in their delusional minds, it is meaningless, if an atheist were honest about his or her atheism they would be nihilist and stop pretending with their version of an invisible sky daddy and stop thinking that their lives have any meaning when it doesn't apart from God, It is a idiotic waste of time

Redeemed by the Blood of the Lamb, Yahoo Answers 30 Comments [10/24/2014 3:08:41 AM]
Fundie Index: 7
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 104278

'LGBT': The 'T' is for Tyranny

Tranny tyranny. Strike that. "LGBT" tyranny. Lesbian, gay, bisexual tyranny. That, generally speaking, is what's on display in Houston right now. But trust me: Unlike Vegas, what happens in Houston will, most definitely, not stay in Houston - not if Democrats continue to have their way.

Houstonians elected themselves, as mayor, an extremist lesbian Democrat (but I repeat myself). She quickly, and quite naturally, took to doing what extremist lesbian Democrats do. Annise Parker is her name, and spreading political Ebola is her game. That and trampling the U.S. Constitution. As you've likely heard, Parker's office has illegal subpoenaed the sermons and privileged communications of a number of Christian pastors who vocally opposed the city's ironically branded "Equal Rights Ordinance" (aka, the Houston Bathroom Bill).


This, of course, is typical Democrat corruption, as well as a gross violation of the First Amendment's free exercise clause - one of the worst we've seen to date. It is, unequivocally, "LGBT" tyranny.

And it's rooted in madness.


Anyway, because it's now illegal to "discriminate based on the basis of gender identity" in Houston, and since it's the only "tolerant" thing to do, men who sign up for the ever-persecuted "LGBT" class have secured the hard-fought "civil right" to fully expose themselves to, and otherwise ogle, your daughters in the ladies' room.

Yay "gay rights"!

But slow down there, Dad. According to the law, if you have a problem with Mr. Francis [Colleen Francis, a trans woman falsely accused of indecent exposure in a woman's restroom earlier in the article] baring all to your baby girl, then you're the problem. You're a "transphobe" ("homophobia's" evil twin sister, er, brother ... whatever). Deck this sicko for terrifying your first-grader and you're off to jail while "Colleen" is off to the "Human Rights Campaign" for a commendation as the latest victim of an "anti-LGBT hate crime."

Rosa Parks in drag, I guess.


The Alamo has returned to Texas. But this time, the bad guys are hoisting a rainbow flag.

Matt Barber, BarbWire 46 Comments [10/23/2014 3:22:10 AM]
Fundie Index: 19
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 104277

I am not an MRA because MRAs are manginas. We men could take down this system and bring back sanity by the end of the day. Women would not be able to stop us, since they lack our physical strength or access to weapons. Then we could make feminists and sluts into prostitutes, kill off all omega scumbag players and make a sane society with decent men and women. MRAs don't stand for that and erroneously believe that women are the problem when just looking at MRAs shows it is men who are the problem.

caamib, Why, God, Why? 66 Comments [10/23/2014 3:22:01 AM]
Fundie Index: 32
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 104276

I have and I still believe I'd have sex with a woman against her consent. The difference now is that when I wrote that I thought that rape is forceful sex against a woman's consent. I was wrong, since I didn't know enough history and was brainwashed my feminist propaganda. Rape is a crime against women's owner or her chastity and consent is irrelevant for women. In fact, should you expect it you're bound to be seen as a complete loser by a woman. All that anti-rape propaganda is actually aimed to keep dumbasses who believe women even want to consent away from getting any sex whatsoever.

So while I'd still forcibly have a sex with a woman I'd never rape, since I wouldn't have forcible sex with a woman who is somebody's property or chaste.

caamib, Why, God, Why? 94 Comments [10/23/2014 3:21:57 AM]
Fundie Index: 48
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 104273

It is astonishing that right beneath the ground upon which the United States has been constructed lies a ready weapon of judgment should the Judge of nations choose to wield it. We are literally suspended over a fiery pit that could swallow us up without warning.

It is a reality that should give us cause for deep humility. We should remind ourselves that life on this earth is transient and that even nations have an ephemeral existence.

But Scripture contains a word of hope for those who will take it to heart. God also spoke to Jeremiah of the possibility that a nation could escape from coming catastrophe: “At one moment I might speak concerning a nation or concerning a kingdom to uproot, to pull down, or to destroy it; if that nation against which I have spoken turns from its evil, I will relent concerning the calamity I planned to bring on it” (Jeremiah 18:7, 8).

American Family Association, American Family Association 21 Comments [10/23/2014 3:17:53 AM]
Fundie Index: 6
Submitted By: Dominic
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 104270

The problem with cities is that people who live there vote loony-left – or, to use the technical term, “Democrat.” However, in Houston they are learning to regret it.

When the lesbian, sad mayoress decided to enact an ordinance allowing her ilk to terrorize properly brought-up young ladies by exposing their flaccid, rearranged pudenda in the female bathrooms that are now open to males, the city’s pastors whipped up a petition that gathered 55,000 signatures – three times the 17,000-odd that were required to squelch the measure unless it were confirmed by a referendum.

The town clerk duly certified that a petition containing at least the required number of signatures had been timeously submitted and received.

However, one should not imagine for an instant that the word “Democrat” means “democrat.” The city attorney (replace the “c” in “city” with “sh” and double the “t”) decided to rule out just over 38,000 of the signatures on the arbitrary and capricious ground that they were legibly written in capitals, or illegibly written in upper- and lower-case.

With a stroke of his lying pen, this sniveling little creep decided – on no lawful authority at all – that just under the required number of signatures were valid.

Next, the “mayoron” (adding the suffix “-on” is the favored loopy-doopy method of neutering a word that was once healthily male or female, though it doesn’t work too well on words like “uncle” or “aunt”) arranged for subpoenas to be issued to the pastors who had collected the signatures, demanding that in future every sermon they proposed to give should be sent to the mayoron’s office for clearance...Also, now that a lesbian transgenderist who has cross-dressed its private parts and has then flaunted them in the female bathroom, horrifying ladies of good taste and breeding who had gone in there, and has then gotten away with it on the barmy ground that prosecuting it for indecency would be “discrimination,” guys now have the right to flaunt themselves in bathrooms all over Houston, and so do the gals.

Lord Monckton, WND 27 Comments [10/23/2014 3:17:05 AM]
Fundie Index: 13
Submitted By: PhillipaFry
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 104266

We have filed a free-speech lawsuit against the Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority, or SEPTA, for refusing to run our ad calling attention to Islamic Jew-hatred on buses in Philadelphia.

We are suing, of course, on First Amendment grounds. SEPTA has just filed its opposition to our motion for a preliminary injunction forcing the ads to be put, including a declaration from an “expert,” Jamal J. Elias, a humanities professor at the University of Pennsylvania, who says our ad is simply false. In fact, it is his claims about our ad that are false, while our ad is entirely accurate.

But even so, this is incredible. Now the government is taking sides, and rejecting our ad because it claims it contains false statements. Does it similarly vet every advertiser’s statement about every commercial product that is claimed to give you whiter teeth, fresher breath, your perfect match for life, and any number of other claims? Is the government really going to go into the business of judging the veracity of every claim in every ad it allows to be put up on its buses or in other public advertising spaces?

Of course it isn’t. It is singling out our ad for this treatment because it doesn’t like our point of view. It violates the blasphemy laws under the Shariah. Under Islamic law, you cannot offend or criticize Islam. The government is enforcing the Shariah.

Pamela Geller, WND 27 Comments [10/23/2014 2:10:25 AM]
Fundie Index: 8
Submitted By: PhillipaFry
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 104264

If a woman has any regard for her own future, she will husband hunt while near her prime sexual market value (aged 18-24), as this is when she can best score a top quality man. As she ages, her choices reduce. By 34 she hits her “Wile E Coyote” moment when her SMV is close to zero. There’s no chance of scoring Mr Big then

Krauser PUA, Krauser PUA 26 Comments [10/23/2014 2:08:57 AM]
Fundie Index: 10
Submitted By: TheBody
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 104260

I’d like to comment on where this column takes me. I don’t go straight to the aftermath of this crime and the “rounding-up” of men, I mean, I’m not all that interested in the separatism that you hypothesize would follow. I’m interested in the at-first strange notion of rounding up men for 20 miles around and putting them in prison when one man rapes a woman. I apologize if these thoughts are pretty tentative.

If a woman is raped by a stranger (meaning the authorities can’t immediately get the criminal off the streets and can’t identify the criminal), it can be said, thinking outside the system, that a crime against the CLASS of women has been committed, not just a crime against an individual. This is because every woman and girl for 20 miles (to use your cutoff) is injured by the crime. All women are once again confined. They already live in a society where their freedom to exist outside their homes is always under attack. Women have been kept from public life, the street, public spaces, anywhere but the family-hole, from time immemorial, and fear of rape has been one of the most effective tools keeping them confined.

It needs to be emphasized that women raped by strangers are in most senses of the word, randomly selected. The rapist may simply find an opportunity, a moment alone with a girl walking down a street. He may have some fetish about black hair. He may not like women who wear red shirts. He may be angry at losing his job. It doesn’t matter. The crime has a random quality, looked at from a larger perspective.

So this rape affects a highly vulnerable population, puts them into renewed fear, and restricts their freedom. If the individual rapist is not caught, none of these women can feel safe. It is the equivalent of all women for 20 miles being rounded up and put in prison, is what I’m getting at. This is the true scope of the crime, and the true set of victims.

So just to embellish your thought-experiment a little, let us say that this is a society which is not male-supremacist – and which fully understands the that such a crime is a crime against a class. Let us say that the punishment must be commensurate with the crime. What should this punishment be?

If it is to be commensurate, it must also treat men as a class. I believe this is where some of your words lead. It’s a revolutionary thought.

In short, men for twenty miles around should suffer the same fear of rape, restrictions on their movements, and fear of being attacked at any moment. This could (logically, but only as a thought-exercise) be accomplished by putting them in literal prisons, not that different from the metaphorical prison women still live in.

But I see a way to make this punishment better-focused and more realistic than rounding up all the men. That is, the authorities should attempt to identify the perpetrator, and if they can’,t they should RANDOMLY arrest a single male in the area. The punishment is then exactly as awful as a the original crime. All men for twenty miles around are placed in fear of being confined and raped (in prison), not knowing which of them will become the scapegoat for their class.

Savage, isn’t it? As savage as the crime, and the effect of women in the area.

One of the problems with trying to step outside the beliefsystem is that there are no words for doing so. For instance, I can’t think of an analogy here to make these thoughts simple. I can say, rape is like burning a cross on a lawn, having the effect of injuring all local African-Americans. Or I could try to analogize tribal warfare, like the Tutsis and Hutus, or kulaks vs serfs, etc etc.

But crime in U.S. jurisprudence is still considered a crime of an individual – there is no legal concept I know of that addresses joint culpability as I try to talk about it here. Maybe others can think better than I can on this point. I suppose that what I’m suggesting, following along with your words, is that the idea of a “class” crime could enter jurisprudence, and used carefully to describe certain crimes by one class against another, with the punishment directed against the entire offending class. A very few violent felonies, such as rape, with its eternal history of use as a tool of social control of a class by another class, would be eligible for inclusion.

tix8770, femonade 38 Comments [10/22/2014 8:45:15 PM]
Fundie Index: 15
Submitted By: skybison
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 104250

"And the last thing we need is to feed the white woman’s narcissism which is already inflated thanks to feminism."

That’s interesting. Atheist Indian once made a remark on Robert’s blog to the effect that white American women who travel to Eastern European countries are humbled on account of not being treated like hot shit, as they are normally accustomed.

However, white women who travel to places like India have their egos skyrocket due to the desi worship of white pussy.

Bay Area Guy, Occident Invicta 22 Comments [10/22/2014 3:42:43 AM]
Fundie Index: 18
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 104248

There is an Austrian Jewish Write Otto weininger who called “Jews are sons of EVE and satan “—His book “sex and character” shows why Jews are solipsistic, they are devoid of any Masculine character—Where ever organized Jewry Exists, it tries to destroy family unit,and attack all institutions which impose restraint over female sexuality

Its not just Jews that are solipsistic but even Indian Hinduism for the most part is a solipsistic faith, from my knowledge most indians are extremely solipsistic, they dont understand the harm they inflict on others,as long as its favourable to their survival they go along with the tide

Is it mere coincidence that Organized Jewry and hindus got a nation around same time?, or is it just an accident when Jewish thought became a norm in Western Civilization today, Hinduism (another Solipsistic culture)is making inroads into west ?, or is it just an accident that both these cultures despise Christianity and Islam –or is it just me who is seeing feminization of Western world where every masculine virtue is degraded and despised.

I think Weininger was right ,When Jewry triumphs they will dissolve every masculine trait in man,They despise masculinity…I believe its a kind of parasitism that Jewry exhibits , when the ecosystem of host nation is completely subdued by Jews,they make sure that all forms of threats are neutralized, First threat to organized Jewry is masculine identity of society,which keeps a constraint on feminine sexuality, once you dissolve masculine identity, All fundamental institutions of society will be destroyed.

I believe behind the mask of innocence, there is some thing evil and despotic about Female Gender.

Ancient Greeks believed that Women are created by God as a punishment for man, Feminine spirit seeks unchecked freedom and Unchecked Female freedom leads to destruction of everything great that men have built

Weininger’s book is eye opening atleast for me, He thinks there is some masculine spirit and Feminine spirit in this world, While masculine spirit strives for aggression ,creative thought,adventure—Feminine spirit seeks revenge,Destruction,unlimited freedom without check..Weininger in his book says,that Feminine spirit in essence is satanic, “The biblical EVE Never liked Adam, she is still in Lust for satan and seeking that forbidden fruit”–He likens “Women as Necessary evil in this world and Jews are seed of Eve and Satan,” . Although i am not religious , I believe the comparison is accurate…

There is another Hungarian Statesmen who despised the Jewry and Reached some what same conclusions as weininger, He wrote a book ” Tragedy of a man” in which biblical Adam,eve and satan are re-incarnated every time in each century as different prominent personalities, the EVE cheats of Adam and begets children from SATAN , God tries to intervene and punishes EVE and gives her next life , but again EVE will stray and will have children with Satan…After each passing century the Humanity on earth becomes decadent …God again intervenes to stop his creation from complete decadence,he gives a final chance to Eve to mate with Adam and establish kingdom of God on earth…The story ends with Eve as Queen and Satan as a minister hatching up a plan after their sexual intercourse to murder the king ( Allegorical ADAM)…and Eve Kills adam and Kingdom of Evil will be established on earth—

The final chapter of ” Tragedy of man” shows Eve Fornicating with satan while their children who inhabit this earth will participate on sodomy ,incest..

India_LandofRapes, Occident Invicta 19 Comments [10/22/2014 3:31:30 AM]
Fundie Index: 20
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 104247

Every living organism – including humans – is in a constant state of degradation or deterioration not evolution. From the moment something comes to be, it already is dying and will eventually die.

The entire living organic system is in a constant fight for survival. Unfortunately, there is nothing in its intrinsic composition powerful enough that would enable it to suppress the inevitable and fateful pull toward its own dissolution or death.

Otherwise, it would divert all of its energy into overcoming said fate by ‘evolving’ out of it, exactly like X-Men’s Wolverine manages to do. Why? Because the survival instinct is the most dominant one. Said evolving characteristic – if it were possible – would in turn be uniformly present in all of creation and entropy would be nothing but a bad memory.


On the surface, X-Men may appear to favor the theory of evolution, but once pertinent questions are asked, that whole facade crumbles like a butterless cookie leaving but a handful of apologetics that work in favor of creationism. [Emphasis added]

1) If according to evolution, mankind is the end result of animals evolving into a better species – hence the word evolution which Webster defines as a process of continuous change from a lower, simpler, or worse to a higher, more complex, or better state – how come many of the X-Men like Wolverine devolve into beasts? Let’s face it, that’s a step back. It’s no longer evolution, but degradation or devolution.

But, let’s just say that the X-Men are really in the process of being fully humans, then-

2) The writers of the series are absolutely right in parading these mutants amidst their fully human counterparts. It shows they have a good grasp of what true applied evolution would really look like. And said understanding raises the most obvious of questions: how come there are no evolutionary mutants running around for real?

The proponents of the Evolution Religion would quickly interject that it takes millions of years for any species to evolve.

How convenient! They can’t explain their cockamamy theory so they throw millions of years at it to confuse the poor-minded into believing a lie.

Biblicism Institute, Biblicism Institute 65 Comments [10/22/2014 3:31:18 AM]
Fundie Index: 24
Submitted By: Night Jaguar
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 104242

The goal of this name changing is to help students “recognize and celebrate the gender diversity of all students” and to “challenge students to think more expansively about their notions of gender.” Really, what this handout is encouraging teachers to do is to destroy any distinction between male and female. This is a natural outcome of a culture that has rejected the Bible as its foundation for thinking in every area. As our culture continues to reject Jesus Christ and move further away from basing its thinking on the solid foundation of the Word of God, we continue to see more of everyone “doing what is right in his own eyes” (Judges 17:6). And our culture seems determined to make sure the next generation follows suit.

This type of thinking has serious consequences. If man is the ultimate authority, then why not just discard gender? And, for that matter, why not just make marriage whatever you want it to be?

Now gender distinction for humans is so important that in the very first chapter of the Bible, which is foundational to the whole Bible, God emphasizes this gender distinction.


God has clearly revealed to us in His Word that gender is not something we can choose to discard. When God created mankind, He made them male and female (Genesis 1:27). It’s only concerning our spiritual state in Christ where there is no male or female distinction, as both are equally made in God’s image and equally valuable in His sight (Galatians 3:28).

Males are neither inherently superior nor inferior to females, but males and females are different. And that distinction becomes particularly important when marriage is in view. Secularists are desperately trying to teach our children that gender is an arbitrary choice rather than a part of who they are designed to be. Yet according to our Creator, each person is designed to be either male or female. And that same Creator stipulated that marriage is a union of a man and a woman. By erasing in children’s minds their identity as male and female, then when they grow up, the ideas of gay marriage and homosexual behavior and any other aberration will seem to be valid and acceptable choices on their menu for life. But man is not the ultimate authority—God is! The Son of God who came into this world to die for the sins of men and women and boys and girls affirmed that from the beginning that being “male” or “female” has been a part of each person’s created identity.

We, as followers of Christ, need to stand firmly on the Word of God and teach our children the truth about gender and marriage. Gender is not a social construct—it is part of who we are because it is a creation of God’s that has been present from the beginning. Neither is marriage whatever you want it to be. God created marriage at the beginning so only God has the right to define marriage.


We also need to teach our children that sin has affected the human race—not only our spiritual state but physically also. Certainly, there are those (an extremely small minority) for which sin may have affected their physical development in some way relating to their sexuality. (See “Feedback: Hermaphroditism.”) Such people need our understanding, love, and care. Also because of the sin that affects us all, some people might be tempted more easily than others in regard to blurring the gender distinction or suffer some confusion or dissatisfaction with the gender God clearly created them to have. But then we all to need to believe God’s Word that:

No temptation has overtaken you except such as is common to man; but God is faithful, who will not allow you to be tempted beyond what you are able, but with the temptation will also make the way of escape, that you may be able to bear it. (1 Corinthians 10:13)

As a teaching exercise for your family, if you have a Bible program on your computer and can do a search on when the words male and female occur in the same sentence, you will be able to see reference after reference in regard to all sorts of human matters where God clearly uses the male and female distinction in regard to humans.

Our children desperately need to be taught the true history of the universe. And every child needs to be taught that he or she has been specially and wonderfully designed, even before they were born (see Psalm 139:14–16), as male or female in the image of God. I encourage you to bring your children to the Creation Museum to help them develop a biblical foundation—remember kids are free in 2014 with a paying adult!

Ken Ham, Answers in Genesis 30 Comments [10/22/2014 3:30:17 AM]
Fundie Index: 10
Submitted By: Nemo
WTF?! || meh
1 2 3 4 5 8