Home Archives Random Quotes Latest Comments Top 100 Submit Quote Search Log In
Quote# 103114

The problem is that our liberal culture encourages us to respond to these experiences of unhappiness by blaming the ever-so-slight remnants of the traditional “NO!” This makes things worse. The LGBTQ project is a good example of this. Nine times out of ten, a “transgendered” individual would be far happier if he or she were simply told, with effective authority—you’re a boy or girl.

R.R. Reno, First Things 16 Comments [9/2/2014 3:30:09 AM]
Fundie Index: 5
Submitted By: Doubting Thomas
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 103113

Kind of funny that during the supposedly wicked days of blatant male dominance and patriarchy, women dressed in a much more modest and dignified manner.

Somehow, even though excessively skimpy outfits coincide with women’s liberation, it’s patriarchy’s fault that women choose to dress like sluts.

I guess the netizens in the manosphere don’t call it the rationalization “hamster” for nothing.

Bay Area Guy, Occident Invicta 13 Comments [9/2/2014 3:29:43 AM]
Fundie Index: 7
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 103110

These Yazidis, nationalistic Kurds etc are all Kuffar. Their blood and wealth are halal.
So whats the fuss.

MuhammadAbdullah89, Islamic Awakening 10 Comments [9/2/2014 3:28:22 AM]
Fundie Index: 7
Submitted By: Hazelnut
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 103108

On today’s edition of the “700 Club,” a viewer told Robertson that her 13-year-old step-son, who “lives with his mother most of the time,” has “crushes on boys” and wanted the televangelist’s help.

Repeating the myth that homosexuality is the result of a lack of parental bonding, Robertson said “his attraction is now toward other men because he’s raised by a woman.”

“I would get him male companions, I’d get him some man to help him, some mentor, someone who cares about young men,” Robertson advised. “He is being raised by a single woman and that is skewing his orientation.”

Pat Robertson, Right Wing Watch 11 Comments [9/2/2014 3:11:43 AM]
Fundie Index: 9
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 103107

I shudder to think when Sarah Silverman dies how awful she's going to suffer. Silverman is Jewish and openly blasphemes the name of Jesus often, just as many Christ-rejecting Jews do today. Jon Stewart (real name: Jonathan Stuart Leibowitz) recently referred to Christ's nativity scene as “the Virgin Manger.” No one hates Jesus as much as Christ-rejecting Jews; and no one loves Jesus as much as truly born-again Jews. I believe that. It was Nicodemus, a born-again Jew (and Joseph of Arimathaea), who loved Jesus and prepared the body of our precious Lord for burial and then buried Him in a tomb.

ABC TV debuted a new sitcom on March 4, 2012 called GCB (Good Christian Bitches). Every Hollywood movie today blasphemes the name of Jesus. Sexual suggestiveness in every movie is synonymous with Jewish-owned Hollywood.

Do you think God has missed any of this filth and blasphemy? These God-haters, sodomites and blasphemers are reserved for the lowest (hottest) parts of Hell. Conan O'Brien is Irish, but he is paid to blaspheme Christ by the Jewish-owned networks. Conan O' Brian brags that he is going to Hell when he dies!

All those lost without Christ will be cast body and soul into Hell forever and ever. Did you know that God casts one's “body” into Hell too? Matthew 10:28, “And fear not them which kill the body, but are not able to kill the soul: but rather fear him which is able to destroy both soul and body in hell.” It would seem likely that God must provide some type of body that can withstand the intense heat of a furnace, burning day and night, where the smoke ascendeth up forever and ever.

David J. Stewart, Jesus is Precious 14 Comments [9/2/2014 3:11:23 AM]
Fundie Index: 5
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 103106

The chairman of the Old Testament who translated the New International Version was an open homosexual. No wonder he removed the word “sodomite” from the Bible completely. It is wickedness to remove the word sodomite from the Bible, which is the Biblical term for a homosexual. Romans 1:25 says that the wicked “change the truth of God into a lie.” Homosexuality is a horrible sin, just as are all sins. Any sin can be forgiven in Christ, but this does not mean embracing the homosexual lifestyle as being acceptable or legitimate. The NIV Bible is of the Devil, translated and endorsed by homosexuals.

If you love Jesus, then you're not going to use a perverted Bible version that diminishes His deity, removes the Godhead and removed the blood of Jesus 15 TIMES!

If Dr. John R. Rice were still alive on earth today, I am convinced that he would take an uncompromising stand as I am, as a preacher, against the perversion of modern corrupt Bible versions. The NIV took the Bible version issue to a whole new level. Now the new NIV 2011 has been published, which is gender neutral, no longer calls the Holy Spirit a “He,” wives are no longer commanded to obey their husbands, et cetera.

David J. Stewart, Jesus is Savior 10 Comments [9/2/2014 3:11:13 AM]
Fundie Index: 4
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 103104

[South Carolina Town has Lesbian Police Chief]

If you read the article it sounds like this sodomite intends to start flaunting and permuting her life style actively from here on out.

If that is the case I’m not sure that’s the sort of environment i’d want to live and raise children around. Sodomy is a diseases, and while victims should be treated with respect and fairness, they should not be trying to spread their misfortune.

There is a fine line between being respected as a person and being a bad role model. If she was as upstanding as she was in the past keeping this sinful and private part of her life behind closed doors there is no reason she can’t continue as she has been.

But if she goes on and does as she seems to be suggesting she now intends to do in the rest of this article in promoting this behavior, then I say that crossed the line, and she should not continue as a community role model.

Monorprise, Free Republic 11 Comments [9/2/2014 3:04:12 AM]
Fundie Index: 5
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 103096

[Bolding mine]

Feminism draws several stark contrasts with the truth of revealed Scripture, rejecting biblical paradigms at every turn. In fact, for the Christian, feminism is best described as a declaration of war against the Bible’s teaching on sexuality. It should be recognized up front that feminism is not a Christian worldview; in fact it is an anti-Christian worldview. The Bible teaches that God created us Male and Female. Feminism teaches that gender is a social construct. The Bible teaches that men and women have distinct roles. Feminism teaches that the gender roles are evil and the Bible is an evil, patriarchal book. Those who hold to Feminism with even a modicum of consistency are lost. Many of them are themselves antichrists.

Timothy Dukeman, Deeper than Sound-Bites 30 Comments [9/1/2014 3:40:27 AM]
Fundie Index: 8
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 103095

The Biblical testimony is clear: you must choose: Feminism or Christianity. You can't have both. How should we think about those who claim to be Christians but still support homosexuality? We should understand that they are lost and pray that God will grant them repentance. To do any less is to refuse to affirm what Scripture teaches.

Timothy Dukeman, Deeper than Sound-Bites 30 Comments [9/1/2014 3:38:42 AM]
Fundie Index: 8
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 103091

In a recently published VICE interview, she explains femitheism as follows: "I believe that conventional equality, with a 50/50 female-to-male ratio, is an inferior system. Essentially my ideas lead to men being made a special class – a far more valued class – having choice of a myriad of women due to the difference in sex ratio. That is my intention. Men would be made more valuable, and their quality of life would be dramatically improved. They would have a subsidised existence if you will, akin to going on an all-expenses paid vacation that lasts from birth to death."

To be fair, she doesn't believe that men should be slaughtered, but that they should be gradually phased out of the population through genetic engineering and possibly selective abortions. And she claims that these steps would not be mandated, "at first," but merely encouraged. Children would very much designed, and raised communally by the state. "Perfect girls will be conceived, developed, and engineered in state-owned breeding centers. They will be bound together in a communal venue under the instruction and control of female savants."

The few men that are left would be kept on their own reservations and used only for breeding, possibly some light labor. When asked if she acknowledged that some men have ambitions beyond "luxury breeding pens," she answered: "Some would argue it would be a dystopian world because it wouldn't be free in the present conventional sense. However that is misguided. It will be utopian because it will be a world almost without conflict where people cooperate and are treated properly within a well-engineered and long-forged system. If everything is great for almost everyone the point is null."

Femitheist Divine, Outer Places 32 Comments [9/1/2014 3:38:19 AM]
Fundie Index: 15
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 103090

people why it is not beneficial to participate in, if in fact there was something wrong with it. I have precious friends and family that have participated in the challenge and I want to make it clear that I am not wanting to offend anybody or condemn anybody who has done the challenge.

If you did it in innocence, then I don’t believe God holds it against you but I do believe that if a Christian participates in it, they should ask God to forgive them and break off any resulting curses. Let me tell you why. After spending time in prayer and doing much research today, I was really bothered by the fact that this Ice Bucket Challenge was bothering me and I didn’t know why. It was on my mind a lot and I kept asking God why. After much prayer and research, I found that the founder, Corey Griffin, of the movement seemed like a good guy. I didn’t find anything wrong with this kid except that he died last week and was unfortunate.

Is his death related to the challenge or is it just a misfortune? Yes and no. On the surface of things, the whole challenge seems like a good cause. It basically is creating awareness to raise funds for Lou Gehrig’s disease, which is a disease of the nerve cells of the brain. The Ice Bucket Challenge is to throw a bucket of ice water on yourself or give a donation towards ALS which does research for finding a cure for the disease.

This is what I found out and what God showed me in my research. ALS uses some of their funds towards Embryonic Stem Cell Research. When I saw that, I finally knew why I was bothered by this challenge in my spirit, but yet still seemed harmless. But I can’t support human embryos being used and destroyed for such a thing. I can’t support killing a baby for this cause. What also bothers me is that the devil himself has come in through the back door to lure the unsuspecting to participate in a ritual that basically signs a contact with the devil to participate in a kind of abortion.

The phenomena of the craze on social media is fueled by a deceiving spirit that brings death. Is it possible that Corey Griffin caused his own death? I hate to say it and it sounds hard and he seemed like a nice guy but this is the perfect picture of the innocent dabbling in something that has originated from hell itself. A life was taken. An innocent life.

This depicts the fact and is a prophetic message that innocent life is taken to try and find a cure for this disease. God definitely wants there to be a cure, but not this way. This whole Embryonic Stem Cell Research is man’s idea, not God’s. It is man’s way of acting out to “be God” in deciding who lives and who dies. This just should not be. I get sick to my stomach thinking about it. So now that I think about what what my friend said that their ex-satanist friend said about the ice bucket ritual, I see very clearly what God is saying through all this.

The enemy has come into America through the back door with what seems like a good work and a good cause but it is only on the surface. As you dig a little deeper and take the time to research, you will see that what I am saying is true. This is a type of sacrifice. It is a type of satanic sacrifice. All these human embryos are being sacrificed. A type of cannibalism is occurring because this craze and this phenomena is causing people to give into this one fund and neglecting other good and noble foundations that have have better causes and more moral ones.

There is definitely a spirit behind this cause and it is not the Holy Spirit. God would never endorse such a fundraiser that supports using human embryos for research. It is abortion, plain and simple. To all those who have already participated, there is no condemnation, but there is a plea from the heart of God to pray, seek his face and ask forgiveness. I really didn’t want to post anything for or against this challenge.

I didn’t want to get involved. But The Lord challenged me to speak the truth and I have done so. Though this post is lengthy, it is very important to pay attention to what God is saying here. Let there be a lesson learned. WE MUST KNOW WHAT WE ARE GIVING INTO! We should only give into good soil.

I have concluded that the Ice Bucket Challenge is not good soil to sow into. I also pray for those who have the Lou Gehrig’s disease that they will be healed by The Lord Jesus Christ and a more noble and moral research breakthrough for this disease will be found. I’m so sorry for offending anyone because of this post. That is not my heart to hurt anyone. Please hear me on this. I felt it was important to speak the truth and speak what The Lord wanted me to say. I truly love you all. Let me leave you with this final, but powerful thought.

“You shall know the truth and the truth shall set you free!”

~ Reeni Mederos

mr.z, Banoosh 17 Comments [9/1/2014 3:36:20 AM]
Fundie Index: 9
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 103087

The average Christian fails to realize that most of the hospitals in America are owned and operated by false religions... St. Elizabeth's... St. Joseph's... St. Mary... St. Jude... et cetera. Eighty-percent of all hospitals in America are Roman Catholic. Please don't misunderstand me, I am NOT condoning false religion. I am just saying that there are few options available when you need a doctor. If I had the choice, I would NEVER step foot into a Catholic hospital.

David J. Stewart, Jesus is Savior 37 Comments [9/1/2014 3:31:37 AM]
Fundie Index: 13
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 103083

Intactivists are generally discouraged from talking about things we cannot prove. Like, does circumcision sometimes mess up personal relationships and contribute to divorce? And could there be a connection between circumcision and war?

As I see it, all boys are born with an intact penis. Boys left intact, what you might call the default, become men with the genitals that have evolved over hundreds of millions of years. They are going to function perfectly with their female counterpart: they evolved to function together. And if those parts were defective, evolution would have eradicated them.

Once you cut off the foreskin, though (say as a sacrifice to the gods or as a painful rite of passage), the law of unintended consequences kicks in. In the old days, people had no idea what they were cutting off. And they cut off only the part of the foreskin that extended beyond the head of the penis. And even today, American medical associations don't talk about the anatomy or physiology of the part they are cutting off.

As I see it, physicians who would cut if off have to prove that there is a medical basis for it and that it does no harm. Whereas medical associations outside the U.S. say there is no medical basis for it and that it does cause pain, physical harm, sexual problems, and sometimes psychological harm.

So to get to the point, American physicians cannot prove that circumcision does not injure the brains of newborns. They have no resistance to pain. They are bombarded with pain. What effect does this have on the brain? We know that circumcision changes sensitivity to pain, possibly for life, so what is happening to the infant brain?

The same with sex. American medical associations claim that circ. does not affect men's sex lives (they don't mention women). That's just B.S. Without a foreskin, the penis doesn't function properly. It's only common sense that it you remove 1/2 of the penile covering, full of nerves and blood vessels, it must change sensation. And studies show that the foreskin is the most sensitive part of the penis. So the likelihood is great that circumcision messes up men's sex lives. And since it turns the penis into a dry stick, that it's going to mess up women's sex lives. Doctors cannot prove otherwise.

Now what effect do you think this has on relationships? There is evidence that circumcised men are less likely to be open about their feelings. Which makes sense. And there is evidence that women enjoy sex more with intact men and less with circumcised men, which makes sense. E.g., one study said women feel less fulfilled with sex. Well then it makes sense that couples are going to be more unhappy with each other, and that this could contribute to the divorce rate. Again, it makes sense, and doctors cannot prove otherwise.

The same can be said of aggressiveness. I keep hearing the rule that abuse begets abuse. You were abused, you abuse someone else. Men who were circumcised are much more likely to opt to circumcise their sons. Violence is inflicted on you, for some reason, you are more likely to inflict it on others.

So it is reasonable to ask, might circumcision contribute to aggression and war? Some could argue no, consider Hitler. You could argue yes, presently circumcised populations are perpetually at war, while the non-circumcised countries mostly are at peace. So circumcision might contribute to the war-like nature of the U.S. Doctors can't prove otherwise.

Maybe circumcision contributes to autism too. There's evidence for that. Doctors can't prove otherwise.

All I'm saying is, all of these claims that circumcision really messes men up and their partners more than ever imagined in the 1950's when 90% of men were circumcised are worthy of consideration. They might all be true. We should keep investigating and see if there is a basis for these claims.

The only possible conclusion is that we no one should cut off part of boys' or girls' genitals. It causes all these harms that were pretty obvious, and have been proven, but it might be more harmful than we know today. There's no money in it for doctors, investigating how harmful circumcision is. So the only conservative thing to do to avoid all these problems - the ones that are obvious and the unintended ones - it to leave boys' penises alone.

photenman, Foreskin Restoration Forum 36 Comments [9/1/2014 3:28:54 AM]
Fundie Index: 1
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 103081

Women have no mind of their own because they ARE US. The lower male rib contains stem cells and is the only part of the male body that if severed, will grow back like a chameleons tail. True in genesis the first woman came FROM THE MALE. Scripture isn't too technical about the details of WOMANS genesis, but it is clear that they came FROM US. Could clones have souls? What about minds? It is suspect that women have incomplete minds at best. WE MEN MUST dominate them with OUR MINDS. The dominated woman is then blessed with a surrogate or shadow mind (our mind) so long as we maintain and bestow that upon her. The greatest gift in life for a woman is to be dominated by a man and be blessed with a home in his castle and to live within the sphere of his mind. Being dominated mind and body by a man is as close to having an authentic 'mind' as a woman can possibly get.

kramw, Return of Kings 36 Comments [9/1/2014 3:27:25 AM]
Fundie Index: 23
Submitted By: Yossarian Lives
WTF?! || meh