Home Archives Random Quotes Latest Comments Top 100 Submit Quote Search Log In
Preview Build of the new site!
1 2 3 4 5 10 12
Quote# 114727

Female activists in Myanmar, also known as Burma, say they’re receiving death threats from extremist Buddhist monks with the Ma Ba Tha, the nationalist group that controls much of the country. The activists are attemping to teach fellow Burmese women about sexual health, an effort that’s turning them into enemies of the state.

The Guardian has a fascinating story today about one piece of the struggle for women’s rights in Myanmar: the fact that Burmese has no word for “vagina.” That makes it extraordinarily difficult to communicate about women’s health issues or articulate if something is wrong. A local paper that recently printed the word “vagina” in English also faced a barrage of angry emails. There are also powerful social taboos dictating that anything having to do with a woman’s genitalia is unclean:

Garments that have come into close contact with a woman’s lower half, such as the traditional htamein (a wraparound skirt worn by most women in Myanmar) or underpants, are considered unclean, even after they have been washed. They are also believed to have the ability to rob men of their hpoun – a concept that could roughly be translated as "masculine power".

As such, it is taught that these items of clothing should never be hung in a place where men will have to walk under them. It is also unacceptable to wash men’s clothes in the same bowl or machine as women’s garments, for fear of contamination or loss of power.

"It’s not right that people should tell us we’re dirty just because we menstruate. It is discrimination,” says 19-year-old Thu Thu, an activist from Shan state.

Activist organizations are increasingly running workshops to teach women about sexual and reproductive health and women’s rights. That’s drawn the ire of the Ma Ba Tha, they told the Guardian; the organization is known in English as the Committee to Protect Race and Religion. The Ma Ba Tha has broad political and social control in the country: they recently backed a law preventing Buddhist women from marrying non-Buddhist men. It was one of four laws dealing with “race and religion” protection; all of them are seen as efforts to crack down on both women’s rights and to discriminate against the Rohingya, the country’s small Muslim minority.

One activist who asked not to be named told the Guardian that she and other people she works with have found their “names, photos and phone numbers” put on posters and displayed at Ma Ba Tha monasteries. They’ve received death threats, intimidation and public humiliation from the monks, she says. Human Rights Watch recently reported that supporters of the Ma Ba Tha recently held a massive, jubilant rally, celebrating the passage of the race and religion laws and signaling the monks’ growing power.

Ma Ba That monks, United Humanists 33 Comments [11/24/2015 3:47:57 AM]
Fundie Index: 18
Submitted By: Demon Duck of Doom
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 114726

If you walk around wearing miniskirts displaying your thighs and inviting men to drool over you, then you want to complain when you have been raped? It’s unfortunate because it will be your fault.

Grace Mugabe, Eyewitness News 37 Comments [11/24/2015 3:47:43 AM]
Fundie Index: 22
Submitted By: Yossarian Lives
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 114725

The Real Mythbusters

An article on Cincinnati.com (AiG and the Creation Museum are located near Cincinnati) this week discussed the visit by the television series stars Adam Savage and Jamie Hyneman of Mythbusters.

The article commenced by discussing the Creation Museum:

The topic of Greater Cincinnati’s very own Creation Museum probably won’t come up during the local stop of “MythBusters,” because, as Adam Savage puts it, it’s not even wrong.

Savage explains this later in an interview with a reporter stating,

Q: Are you going to visit the Creation Museum while you’re in town?

A: Ah! I haven’t considered it, but holy [vulgar word], what an idea. I had forgotten it was there, but my goodness, I don’t think I could pass that up.

Q: Do you have a conflicted feeling about contributing money to the museum by paying the price of admission?

A: The conflicted feeling I have is, there is a scientific term which I really like that is “not even wrong,” and these are ideas that are so far off the mark they’re not even worth discussing. I’m worried about participating or giving oxygen to ideas that are not even wrong lest I lend them a credibility as something that’s debatable.

Q: So if you were to go to the museum, you wouldn’t talk about the experience on stage, because that would be giving it oxygen, as you say.

A: My particular bailiwick isn’t to be a provocateur in that regard. Again, part of it is not giving oxygen to ideas that I don’t think are very debatable. I have empathy for people. And I don’t feel like going up on stage and telling some members of the audience, “By the way, I think you’re idiots.” I tend to stay away from that sort of polemicism. At the same time, if I’m asked, I’ll respond to questions directly. I’ve never had a problem doing that on stage.

Q: What would the reason be for going to the museum, if it’s not for getting material for the stage show?

A: For me it’s sort of like slowing down and looking at the car accident.

Well, I’ve got news for Adam Savage: the real myth busters are found at the Creation Museum. If Savage came to the Creation Museum, he would meet some academics and scientists who powerfully bust the myth of molecules-to-man evolution:

Dr. Nathaniel Jeanson, PhD in cell and developmental biology from Harvard University, who was actively involved in adult stem cell research and has been published in several peer-reviewed secular journals in this field.

Dr. Andrew Snelling, PhD in geology from the University of Sydney, who was a researcher and editor on the Radioisotopes and the Age of the Earth (RATE) project from 1997–2007, and has published many articles in various peer-reviewed scientific journals.

Dr. Georgia Purdom, PhD in molecular genetics from Ohio State University, who was a biology professor at Mount Vernon Nazarene University, has published in several peer-reviewed journals, and is co-founder of the Microbe Forum.

Dr. David Menton, PhD in cell biology from Brown University, who was tenured at Washington University, served as the histology consultant for five editions of Stedman’s Medical Dictionary, and was a guest lecturer in histology at Stanford University Medical School.

Dr. Tommy Mitchell, who earned his MD from Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, has been a medical doctor since 1987, and is a Fellow of the American College of Physicians.

Dr. Terry Mortenson, PhD in the history of geology from Coventry University in England and MDiv in systematic theology from Trinity Evangelical Divinity School in Illinois, has served as seminary and research staff for Campus Crusade for Christ (CRU) teaching across Europe, and is still an active member of the Evangelical Theological Society.

Dr. Elizabeth Mitchell, who earned an MD from Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, is a retired obstetrician who earned board certification and fellowship in the American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology, and now writes extensively for AiG.

Dr. Danny Faulkner, PhD in astronomy from Indiana University, was a professor at the University of South Carolina Lancaster for 26 years, is a member of the Creation Research Society, operates the observatory and planetarium at the Creation Museum, and has written hundreds of papers in astronomy and astrophysics journals.

I challenge Adam Savage to make the short drive from Cincinnati and meet some true myth busters at the Creation Museum and see how his beliefs in evolution stand up against real observational science. In meeting with these academics and scientists, and touring our world-class museum with its stunning science exhibits, he will discover that evolution is a myth and gets busted for what it is—and he will learn the truth about the God who created him, that he has a sin nature, and is in need of salvation. Our burden is to reach Adam Savage with the saving message of the gospel and help him understand that observational science confirms that the Bible is the true history book of the universe.

Thanks for stopping by and thanks for praying,

Ken Ham, Answers in Genesis 41 Comments [11/24/2015 3:47:28 AM]
Fundie Index: 19
Submitted By: Chris
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 114720

[If you care more about the life and safety of an embryo and not the life and safety of a Syrian refugee, adult or child, you’re not pro-life.]

I care more about the life and safety of an UNBORN CHILD because they are not potential terrorists trying to kill all of us. Dumbest argument I’ve ever read.

prolife21, Tumblr 31 Comments [11/24/2015 3:46:24 AM]
Fundie Index: 16
Submitted By: Demon Duck of Doom
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 114715

How to Identify a Male Chauvinist

First off, we need to define what is male chauvinism, because there is a lot of confusion out there. Male chauvinism is the belief, whether conscious or not, that women, womanhood, femininity, and therefore, beauty, are inferior to, men, masculinity, manhood, and strength. So you see, it’s a little bit broad of a definition, so let’s break things down some, shall we? Below are several examples of what Male Chauvinism looks like in todays society/church.

Anyone who believes that it is acceptable for a woman to be in the police force and military, is someone who is a misogynist, and frequently, but not always, a male chauvinist. This is pretty crystal clear, but what else do these people think and believe?

Well, unfortunately, many people think that chivalry is chauvinism, but on the contrary, its the loving notion that women deserve respect and special treatment. So the people who are attacking chivalry are guilty of male chauvinism. Male chauvinism is having a low view of a woman’s God-given role, little value for their God-given gifts, and no appreciation for womanhood’s uniqueness. Too many men and women have no appreciation or value of beauty; only valuing strength and leadership, at the expense of womanhood. God did not make Eve suited for leading, but Adam. The Creator did not make Eve to represent the strength of God, but His beauty. Why do we as men not cherish beauty in our daughters; appreciate their lack of leadership, just as God intended it? Why do we want them to be ‘just as strong and as much of a leader as a boy’? Why are we listening to the chauvinism and so called ‘wisdom’ of this world?

Chauvinism is treating your wife or daughter like she is just as tough and brave as a man, even though the Great Creator did not make them that way. Treating them like steel pots instead of fine china. Countless women are male chauvinists too, but for some reason, many people think that only a man can be one. Some women, in fact, hate women and womanhood so much, that they don’t even want to be women, but would rather be men. This is the perverted product of this wretched sin. What are you teaching your children? Are you teaching both your boys and girls to be tough, strong, brave leaders? You’re probably a male chauvinist who bought into the cool-aid the world is offering.

Chauvinism is not treating women as special and different, not cherishing them, nor their beauty, but instead cherishing masculine traits in a woman. Is any of this making sense? It is hateful, or misogynistic, to try to make a fish fly, or pig swim. We can only do that which we were created to do. But people hate women, womanhood, and femininity, and so want women to do what God did not create them to do. Encouraging a woman to be the leader in a relationship, to take on the burdens that she should not have to carry, is incredibly unloving and unbiblical.

Male chauvinism is the attitude that taking care of the house and children is ‘not important’ or a ‘waste’; the sinful idea that bringing home a paycheck is somehow so much more lofty and noble and worthy of a task. God gave both tasks; providing and protecting is the task He gave to men. Raising the kids and tending the home is the task that the good Lord gave the women, but many men and women look down on these jobs as inferior for a woman. This is the very height of male chauvinism.

In order to identify male chauvinists, we are going to have to understand how they think, what they believe. Sometimes they are disguised as godly people, sometimes they are godly people who are sinful and imperfect like you and I. Sometimes they will hide under the banner of ‘equality’, but in truth, they want no such thing. They never do. The more we understand the different flavors of male chauvinism, the more we can identify them. But as long as we are calling good ‘bad’, and bad ‘good’, then we will always have troubles spotting the spiritual disease of arrogance and pride.

Lilyofthevallies, disciples perspective  21 Comments [11/24/2015 3:44:15 AM]
Fundie Index: 9
Submitted By: undie not fundie
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 114713

7 (8) Reasons Why Women Should not be Cops

1. NOT a Woman’s Spiritual make-up: Peter 3:3–4 which urges women to cultivate a “gentle and quiet spirit.” Being a cop is NOT cultivating this. God did not create women to be the aggressive, assertive, dominant sex, and yet, that is precisely what the feminists want and the police force needs.

2. NOT a Woman’s Physical make-up: Clearly God did not design women, as a whole and in general, with this purpose in mind, clearly it was a role that God gave men, so why are women taking it from them? Why are women going against God’s obvious intent? If it is wrong for a man to hit a woman because he is stronger, then what about a woman who is a cop?

3. Image: In Song of Solomon, we see it is the woman’s job is to bare the image of a flower, of beauty and fragility. “I am a rose of Sharon, a lily of the valleys.” Song 2:1. Impossible to do as a Navy Seal or a soldier. A woman should represent womanhood IN the home AND outside the home. This cannot be done in the inherently masculine role of a cop, or, like my previous post talked about, as G. I. Jane.

4. Setting bad example: If it is not something you want your children to emulate, then why are you doing it? A woman as a cop or even a soldier can lead to confusion, and gender confusion leads to homosexuality. The number of lesbians in the military and especially the police force, are incredibly high. There is a correlation that many men in the military have picked up on. Your are leading others kids astray, causing them to stumble…

5. Scandalous: Furthering on the last note, I am afraid that a ‘Christian’ woman who is a cop, is creating a scandal. Because of the reputation of female cops as being lesbians is such a recognized truth among certain groups, it is pure scandal in the church of Christ. Eph. 5:3, “But sexual immorality and any impurity or greed should not even be heard of among you, as is proper for saints. (Italics mine).”

6. Usurping /stealing man’s intended purpose and role: God gave this role to men, so why are women taking it, as if they ‘have a right’ to it? This is not the natural order of things that God has set forth, and yet so many people instinctively know this. God does not screw up, nor is He arbitrary; He designed men and women for a purpose, and those purposes are NOT the same. A man’s role is to protect women, children, and society. Why do we have women who are not satisfied with their God given roles?

7. Pragmatic Reason: Men are not being men, to a very large degree, because women are not being women. You want your man to be a man? Then get out of his way and stop doing his job for him. Very, very, few men desire to have a wife who is a cop; it is shameful for a man if a woman is just as, or more so, of a man than he is. This is inherent in the way God made men and women. You want to increase your odds of getting married? Be a woman, not a man.

8. Cross-dressing is Wrong: It is a perversion, it’s ungodly. Society ‘accepts’ men and women who cross dress, but that does not mean the God who created them does. Our God is not a God of confusion so why do we have women who are dressing up in the manliest clothes they can possibly wear? Because they want to be masculine. This is wrong, unhealthy, and only creates confusion. Just because society applauds women wearing clothes that makes are inherently masculine, does not mean the church should.

This feminist culture has redefined what it means to be a woman, now the church needs to redefine it again, back to what it should be. Even little children know that a woman should not be a cop, let us humble ourselves and learn from the ‘wisdom from the mouth of babes’.

Lilyofthevallies, disciples perspective  32 Comments [11/24/2015 3:43:20 AM]
Fundie Index: 14
Submitted By: undie not fundie
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 114710

Kids are sponges. No one needs proof about this. We just know that the large majority of kids soak up everything they encounter. Languages come naturally to kids it seems like. My 6 cousins ranging from ages 3-10 recently moved to Brazil for missions work. These 6 kids caught on so fast. Within 5 months, they were translating for me when I went to visit them this past summer. They learn so fast! Unfortunately, kids also pick up and learn behavior that is not conducive to Christian living.

[The first most important above all else, even with what follows, is the child’s relationship with the Lord. Without Christ they are lost completely.]

Children will learn what their role is in life through the ones they are most around (parents, daycare, neighbors, and school). Knowing and following Christ is most important in the child’s life. What’s next after that? What they will do in life? What college they will go to? We as parents need to not forget this: One day, if the Lord wants, your child will grow up. They will become men and women. This culture says there is no difference between men and women (women being forced to sign up for the draft is next, don’t believe me? Type it in Google and see what pops up). Culture is saying that men can fit into women’s mold and women can fit into men’s mold. What they are not saying is the consequences of this belief.

Little girls must be raised to be women. Little boys must be raised to be men. What does this mean? What does this look like? What does the Bible say about this? Is it that important?

If women are to follow the authority of Christ, the church leaders, fathers, and husbands, why in the world are we pushing and encouraging them desperately to be leaders of the next generation? Why are we pushing them to not need men? Why are we loving the movie ‘Brave’ which promotes that women can be just as good and better than men at being men?

Please listen and think very deep about this. Women will never match up to men at being men….because guess what (pause for effect) women are not men. And the opposite is true as well. Men will never match up to women at being women because they aren’t women.

So the question I have is this, “Why did the first statement bother you if it did?” I could possibly have the answer. Because a year ago I would have had a big problem because I was taught wrong.

As a woman, I thought I was inferior to men for being a woman. So I looked down on womanhood, motherhood, and femininity. I fought tooth and nail to reject the essence of who God created me to be. I wanted to fit man’s mold. I was angry at God for making me a woman. I have heard this from so many women more and more that they thought this growing up too. What in the world?? Do boys grow up angry at God because God created them boys? I’m guessing they don’t as much because this culture values masculinity more than femininity. Being weaker is inferior, being beautiful is ‘dumb’ and ‘pointless’. Needing a man to complement what women don’t have is looked down on. No wonder stay at home moms should ‘do something important with their life.’ That is the biggest lie I ever believed. Next week, Lord willing, I will continue the thought that, no….we CAN’T afford to learn how to be women and men later in life…we have to teach and train kids how to be men and women now. While we can…. while they are sponges.

Lilyofthevallies, disciples perspective  20 Comments [11/24/2015 2:58:36 AM]
Fundie Index: 8
Submitted By: undie not fundie
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 114700

Well I think Col Ralph Peters said it correctly, the Obama strategy is to recall Holder to head a movement called JEHADI LIVES MATTER. As long as he isn't touched by his Muslim brothers he will be okay with American terror deaths at the hands of the ISIS Army he's importing. He already has seeded the Executive Branch with Muslim Brotherhood members, some have been named on line as infesting the Dept joke of Homeland Security. And his good buddy John Barack O'boehner when Speaker shot down Michelle Bachman and four Conservative members of Congress for an investigation of this hiring of our enemies within our government. Which kinda makes ya wonder why the Weeper did NOTHING to
protect this Republic from this monster. When something happens here a la Paris I believe he and Squish McConnell along with the other careerists in Congress should be held as responsible as the Obama Crime Synidcate and answer for the same crimes. They the GOP lied to us in 2014 and both of them, Squish and Weeping Johnny LIED to us, and have done nothing. We can't afford to allow the Socialist left a.k.a the D's to take over,we learned how much they respect our Constitution after passing HA! ObamaCare but hopefully the voters in the states they (Establishment as a whole) will remove them ALL and put loyal patriotic members in their place. Ted Cruz is RIGHT
it's the Washington Cartel, and it's represented by the Establishment on both sides.

tncnslrsldy , American Thinker  13 Comments [11/24/2015 2:56:25 AM]
Fundie Index: 9
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 114698

[On the Obamas]

Just like the refusal to light the colors of the French flag on the White House. I guess the Sodomite flag is the only one that matters and the Red White and Blue is our flags colors also and actions speak louder than words. Their HATE for this Republic and Amercians is obvious.

tncnslrsldy , American Thinker  20 Comments [11/23/2015 7:50:34 PM]
Fundie Index: 8
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 114690

There is no real "debate." A true debate has legitimate arguments on both sides. There is only one legitimate argument here. Islam is of Satan. Muslims follow Islam. Therefore Muslims are disciples of Satan. They are the enemy of Western culture, society, and civilization. Thus no Muslim should be allowed entry to the US for any reason and all non US citizen Muslims should have their visas revoked and deported. Get on with it.

JamesSmith61, The Christian Post 12 Comments [11/23/2015 7:47:23 PM]
Fundie Index: 7
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 114680

The truth is only hate to those who hate the truth. I am a very hated person and have been told so repeatedly, because I speak the truth, and that offends people. People get angry when I say that the Popes are burning in Hell, but it's true. I don't want Roman Catholics to follow the Popes into Hell. I make no apologies for speaking the truth. Abortion is murder! Homosexuality is a sin! Drunkenness is a sin! Feminism and divorce are sins! 9/11 was an inside job! The Federal Reserve Banksters are rotten, hideous, criminals! Evil criminals have hi-jacked the White House. The War On Terror is a fraud! The War in Iraq is evil. There is no War On Drugs. Americans are being deliberately dumbed down in a Communist public school system. The mainstream newsmedia are a bunch of overpaid professional liars.

The open borders are deliberate, forcing real wages into the gutter and bankrupting America's hospitals. Our jobs have been relocated to foreign soil, while parents are having their kids confiscated by CPS because they can't afford an apartment. Millions of Americans have had their homes stolen by the Banksters because they can't afford to pay their mortgages. And yet our leaders have allowed U.S. Corporations, who receive U.S. tax-breaks, to move their operations overseas to exploit foreign slave labor. Of course Americans cannot pay their bills anymore! We've been betrayed by treasonous acts by treasonous leaders in Washington D.C., who are in bed with Wall Street criminals. Watch The Obama Deception to learn just how much Wall Street has infiltrated the White House. Watch END GAME for the best all-around big picture of what's going on in the world today. We are living in the Last Days my friend, the End Times of humanity.

"...because they received not the love of the truth, that they might be saved." Very FEW people love the truth these days. Very FEW people are saved. The masses of society are like cattle being herded into cities, awaiting the slaughterhouse. Let us not be deceived by these LYING WONDERS in the Last Days. The Devil is alive and actively working to steal, kill and destroy. We must make sure that our own house is in order and watch for the Rapture. Surely, the Lord's return cannot be far away.

David J. Stewart, Jesus is Savior 22 Comments [11/23/2015 7:45:24 PM]
Fundie Index: 6
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 114679

Isn't that what heaven is supposedly like? Where everything is perfect and no one can come to harm?

Sure, but keep in mind this question: who is in Heaven?

Answer: the very few people who during their time on earth chose to believe in and obey God (this point is especially what almost no one does) and accept Jesus' payment of their sin debt. That all sounds very simple, but almost no one actually does it.

In other words, the population of Heaven is what we could call in human terms "a biased sample." Only the cream of the crop of the human population gets in, and they got in because they chose to live godly lives.

Now, compare that to the unbiased sample that comprises 99.999999999+% of the humans on the earth who are ungodly. They either proactively hate God, or are indifferent to God. In either case, they fail to obey God, and they commit acts of evil constantly. Those type of people never get into Heaven. And them not being allowed in is one of the main reasons why Heaven is able to be perfect.

"Science creates fictions to explain facts" - Gilman

Navaros, IMDB 44 Comments [11/23/2015 4:34:30 AM]
Fundie Index: 17
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 114678

At this point, we need to be more serious about seperating. Y'all think this shit is a game? Y'all think the answer to our prayers is Bernie sanders getting elected and enforcing more laws that’ll keep us safe? Newsflash: there are already laws for that! A law is nothing but a signature on a piece of paper when it comes to the value of black people in America. More laws isn’t going to change that.

There’s no reason black people should continue dealing with such mistreatment and hate. Especially if we don’t have to. The african American ethnicity is decreasing. With high abortion rates, crime in inner cities, the cops hunting us down, etc soon they’re going to be rewriting our history or just not telling our history becuase we’re going to be to weak as a people to fight or raise our voices.

It’s time to put up or shut up. “The time is now.”- Sandra Bland

takeprideinyourheritage, Tumblr 28 Comments [11/23/2015 4:33:53 AM]
Fundie Index: 15
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 114677

So, google fetal homicide laws. You don't seem to realize that in many nations, abortion is legally considered murder as well. In the Netherlands and Belgium, infant euthanasia is not considered to be murder. And can you please cite me a single scientific source that denies that fetuses are human beings?

Tullia_Ciceronis, Live Action News 17 Comments [11/23/2015 4:20:35 AM]
Fundie Index: 5
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 114676

Obama Appears on Cover of LGBT Magazine

President Obama has just become the first sitting President of the United States to appear on the cover of an LGBT (Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender) publication. His photograph recently filled the cover of OUT magazine alongside the caption “Our President: Ally. Hero. Icon.”

President Obama also provided an interview for the magazine, in which he made several statements that helped highlight the change that has occurred in the Western culture’s thinking over the past few decades. He stated, “There had been a remarkable attitude shift — in hearts and minds — across America. The [Supreme Court] ruling [legalizing gay marriage] reflected that. It reflected our values as a nation founded on the principle that we are all created equal.” Now, this is ironic. Obama clearly believes in evolution. He even called the supposed human ancestor “Lucy” (really just an extinct ape variety) “our oldest ancestor” and said that “all the people of the world are part of the same human family, the same chain” because of our evolutionary connection! So first he says that we are all equal because we all evolved from a common ancestor, but now he says we’re all equal because we were created that way, which is a biblical principle. You really can’t have it both ways—did we evolve from a common ancestor or were we created to be equal? But President Obama is often inconsistent in his worldview!

He is right, however, in saying “there has been a remarkable attitude shift—in hearts and minds—across America” and that the Supreme Court ruling was a result of that. Our culture has, by and large, turned away from a biblical worldview—and President Obama has been leading this change in many ways. Instead of basing our morality on the firm, unchanging foundation of God’s Word, our culture has decided that whatever is right in its own eyes (Judges 21:25) is right and moral. This change has been dramatic, and many of the moral ills of our society (like abortion and gay “marriage”) are a result of this fundamental shift in our nation’s thinking.

Ken Ham, Answers in Genesis 26 Comments [11/23/2015 4:20:23 AM]
Fundie Index: 15
Submitted By: Chris
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 114673

[You get really drunk, pass out and I rob you. You chose to get really drunk so what I did is ok.]

Do you agree?

Yes, it's my fault for getting myself that drunk and passing out on the spot.

[That's fucking stupid. The thief stole from you, regardless of whether you allowed for it to happen or not.]

Ultimately, it's my fault for affording him that chance. Look, I can't be pissed off at a dog for eating a steak that I left on the ground. It's in the dog's nature, just as it is in the thief's nature to steal. Sure, the thief shouldn't steal from me. But that doesn't mean it's not also my fault for affording him that chance. Should the thief be held accountable for his actions if he is caught? Undoubtedly so. But his misconduct doesn't excuse my responsibility. And by the by, though I don't expect you to respect my opinions and beliefs. I do expect you to keep the conversation civil and decent. The moment you start insulting me over a disagreement is the moment I stop engaging with you.

[But it is not in man's general nature to steal. All criminals should be held accountable no matter what. You had no real knowledge that someone was definitely going to come and steal your stuff, or rather had no assurance]

This situation (passed out drunk and wallet taken away) could have been easily avoided if I had responsibly consumed my drink. With this being said, not only is the thief in the wrong, but I'm also in the wrong. Me more so than the thief. Pfft, I feel like I'm speaking to someone who's never had a drink before in his life.

"Boo hoo, I was irresponsible thus I suffered the consequences! Life is so unfair! Please punish the thief whom I afforded the opportunity to steal my possessions with ease!"

Sure, I'd like for him to be punished but I'm not going to freak the fuck out over it since I was the one who afforded said thief the opportunity to steal my shit. If anything it's a good reminder to be responsible with my drink.

Phantasmal, Hack Forums 36 Comments [11/23/2015 4:20:09 AM]
Fundie Index: 17
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 114671

Orbital motion comprises of three separate forces each playing their part.

Pendulum motion explains it best whereby gravity gives way to centrifugal force which continues until a weightless force allows gravity to return. This is why our orbital path is elliptical. So the nasty disturbances we are creating on this planet will certainly put this planet under a great load...and WW3 will probably be the last straw.

The Holy Bible does indicate that the planet will remain part of the solar system but much further away from the sun and life will be very different.

It seems that the planet is now struggling to maintain the status qho hence all the unexpected and unusual global disturbances which, it seems, has aroused the interest of scientists from other worlds.

NicholasMarks, Religion and Ethics 17 Comments [11/23/2015 4:18:44 AM]
Fundie Index: 20
Submitted By: NearlySane
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 114670

Immediately after the tribulation of those days, the sun will be darkened, and the moon will not give its light, and the stars will fall from heaven, and the powers of the heavens will be shaken.

                                  Matthew 24:29          Isaiah 13:10          Revelation 6:13.

To the franchise holder of God’s ‘Grand Unification of All the Universal Forces’ this line from the Holy Bible can only mean one thing…The planet Earth is going to break out of its gravitational moorings. Due to all the abuses inflicted upon it the planet will suddenly, and without warning, centrifugally lurch beyond its normal orbit and pass to a new orbital position leaving the moon and the sun behind, and giving the impression that the stars are falling to the Earth.

The clues are all around us…global warming…the global, atmospheric, trumpet sounds, that have no apparent cause…the earthquakes and sink-holes that spring out of nowhere…all given adequate account of on YouTube and are telling us of the stresses and strains the world is having to resist.

The trauma is well recorded in the surrounding Biblical verses giving us the indication that those who are well prepared for it in a righteous and enduring way will be able to cope best and will survive especially with the mechanics of resurrection in their favour.

NicholasMarks, Religion and Ethics 11 Comments [11/23/2015 4:18:24 AM]
Fundie Index: 10
Submitted By: Nearly Sane
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 114667

Atheists can't be moral. No way shape or form, you idiots. Did you know that Darwin said in his Origin of Species that the final goal of secular humanism was for secular humanists to take wild animals and sic them on whole cities against humans? How is THAT morality!?

They pushed evolution becuase Darwin said that people would think we were just wretched animals if we believed that and then we'd basically say "I'm the lowest of the low and a tiger deserves to eat me." It's all there in National Geographic. They did an article once about how scienticians are planning to have all the animals eat us. Even your dog might be part of the plan.

You stupid atheists think with your secular "humanism" that you have it all figured out don't you? WHAT is the origin of the universe!? You can't answer. The only "humanism" is a literal reading of the KJV Bible in English. That's it.

I'm all for religious freedom, but you will not insult my faith. Try it and you'll see what a knuckle tastes like. You can realize that now of when you're burnin', you know... in "that place". Hope you made the right decision!

anonymous, Yahoo Answers 33 Comments [11/23/2015 4:17:22 AM]
Fundie Index: 20
Submitted By: zipperback
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 114659

In the Bible, God destroyed the twin cities of both Sodom and Gomorrah for the sin of homosexuality, and He did it by raining down fire and brimstone on them. The Bible also says that God is “no respecter of persons”, meaning that if He judged them for homosexuality then He certainly will judge us also. So why does He appear to be waiting on issuing that judgment? Because the Bible says that God allows you time to either let your cup fill up to the top, or to allow you to get right and empty it yourself.

“For in the hand of the LORD there is a cup, and the wine is red; it is full of mixture; and he poureth out of the same: but the dregs thereof, all the wicked of the earth shall wring themout, and drink them.” Psalm 75:8 (KJV)

So it comes as no surprise that Barack Obama is the cover boy on a magazine that exists to out and promote homosexuals. Just as it will come as little or no surprise the day it is revealed that Obama is a homosexual himself. Why do we say that? Because of this:

* Obama campaigned as a Christian, but as president has supported the cause of Islam and the Muslims.
Obama said in 2008 that “marriage is between a man and a woman”, but as president turned America into an LGBT nation.

* Obama said that”if you like your doctor you can keep your doctor”, and as soon as Obamacare rolled out, almost no one got to keep their doctor at a price they could afford.

* Obama said that his “red line” with Syria was if they used chemical weapons, well they did and he did nothing about it.

* Obama said he would have the “most transparent regime administration in US history”, but has been one of the most secretive of all time.

Liberal poet Maya Angelou once said that “when someone shows you who they are, believe them”. Obama sat in a studio and posed specifically for that photo and specifically for that magazine cover. It’s called OUT Magazine, could he be any more obvious or intentional?

Look closely at the cover of this month’s Out Magazine, America, Barack Obama is showing you who he is.

Believe him. I do.

Geoffrey Grider, Now The End Begins 16 Comments [11/23/2015 4:15:31 AM]
Fundie Index: 8
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 114658

If you're a deist, then you're not a Christian. That makes no sense.

@Mimic Octopus
If you're fighting something as nebulously sinister and soul-crushingly evil as Christianity or Islam, you have to be forceful and vigilant. It's the only way they will ever get the message.

Yes it carries the risk of self-righteousness, but that's a price I'm willing to pay if it means helping others in the long run and making a positive difference in the world.

NeoMatrix, FSTDT 65 Comments [11/23/2015 4:15:25 AM]
Fundie Index: 6
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 114655

It's mainly the Left and the homosexuals who are intolerant, angry, and uncivil.

Leftists and liberals teach their children to be angry and unhappy about everything.

As a result, a lot of them are obnoxious, know-it-all brats.
Nothing is ever good enough for them.
Basically, they hate themselves and America.

Michex, BarbWire 11 Comments [11/23/2015 4:13:35 AM]
Fundie Index: 7
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 114653

Eliminate the genesis for Muslims here in America and deport all practicing Muslims back to their home countries.

CLUE: There were no practicing Muslims, no Mosques, no Sharia, and no Islamic terrorism in 17th-century America whose governments of, by, and for God were established upon His unchanging moral law, beginning with the First Commandment.

Biblical immigration and border policy begins with the First Commandment, which, in turn, demands all immigrants leave their gods, their culture, and their laws at the border or suffer the consequences. No Muslim would ever agree to such law.

QUESTION: So, WHAT was it that changed America from what it was in the 17th-century to what it is now--arguably the most polytheistic nation to exist, including Islam?
ANSWER: The First Commandment was replaced with the First Amendment's First Commandment-violating Free Exercise Clause.

It's one thing to allow for individual freedom of conscience and private choice of gods (something impossible to legislate to begin with). It's another matter altogether for government to enable any and all religions to proliferate through the land evangelizing our posterity to their false gods.

Kingdom Ambassador, BarbWire 19 Comments [11/23/2015 4:12:37 AM]
Fundie Index: 13
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 114652

Holy Savagery

One of the objections to Atheism is its inability to account for the morality of our conscience. If God doesn’t exist, why not steal, why not murder, why not rape and pillage. Some of the most dastardly deeds are done by seemingly conscienceless individuals. Their ends usually win them the best seat in the execution chamber: the ever-coveted high-voltage chair, or else an extended furlough in a ten-by-eight cell.

They have overridden the morality in their conscience and convinced themselves that God doesn’t exist, leaving them free to follow depravity’s path.

Unlike the community criminal, the Jihadist has a deified blessing to carry out evil against the non-Muslim. It’s an excuse for the Muslim to let their baser instincts (a result of man being born into sin) take over with a wink from Albert, (bless-his-name-forever-more) sorry, I mean Allah.

Society’s Split Brain Syndrome

On our end, we want freedom from God to lust, to abort, to steal, to cheat, to hallucinate, to trade natural affections for unnatural affections, to fill our minds with trash or to ignore the poor. We want God to go stand in the corner till we need Him to prosper, to grow, to protect or to heal.

“Come close God…ok now go away”.

The “Obamination Ad-menstruation” getting in for a second term is the result of our schizophrenic relationship with The Almighty. Like I have written before, we now have our modern day ‘Saul-ibaba’.

Two Enemies in the West

What we have seen in Paris is not unfathomable, but totally predictable. I mean you’d have to be in a coma to not have seen this coming. The western world has allowed two demonic enterprises to join forces and attack the spiritual backbone of what are now just cadavers of nations.

On one hand we have invited the most barbaric political ideology possible, Islam, to come find some nice fertile soil in our own backyards. Putting up with their Halal this, cover that; “We’re offended by this institution”; offended by that cross over there; “Take down that nativity for Allah’s sake!”

We ignore the fact that they are taking over entire towns and recruiting for Islamic guerilla camps within our own borders.
Bring this up at the next cocktail party you attend (total “elephant in the room” scenario).

On the other hand we have the disgruntled atheist who demands that not even the resting places of dead soldiers are sacred ground (and we joke in disgust about the Westboro Baptist cult!).

“Get rid of the nativity!”

“Remove those three most repugnant letters (G-o-d) from society.”

Really the only difference between the far-lefty and the Jihadist is that one of them will put bacon in their Caesar salad. In reality they both hate America and desire to reshape it into something we totally abhor.

You just can’t let subcultures have this kind of power.

It’s easy to be a terrorist in Europe.

JG Smoothy, BarbWire 13 Comments [11/23/2015 4:12:30 AM]
Fundie Index: 10
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 114651

It should also be mentioned here that human embryos, whether they are in a laboratory, a woman’s womb, or wherever, are complete human beings--spirit, soul, and body. (That is why when a girl or woman is pregnant she is said to be “with child.” There is a child in her womb. It is not called “with embryo” or “with fetus” or “with tissue.”) And to kill (abort) one of these people is also murder.

Rev Matthew Norville, Sr., Batavia Christian Center 20 Comments [11/22/2015 3:37:17 PM]
Fundie Index: 14
Submitted By: undie not fundie
WTF?! || meh
1 2 3 4 5 10 12