[Let's go back to the golden age of spirit theories of disease and sacrificing virgins to volcanoes!]
The IDers are quite correct, naturalism adds nothing to science, makes no specific predictions, generates no theories, contributes nothing to method. It is so devoid of scientific content that it doesn't even make sense to call it a 'science-stopper.' Its simply irrelevant. It does serve well for what I call an 'intellectual cudgel.' We can use it to browbeat recalcitrant religionists over the head with.
Rock, Access Research Network 7 Comments
[9/1/2002 12:00:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 5