Quote# 4272

now we should define eveloution 1st it can simplaly mean what and when more comlex stuf apperd on earth - proff fossial record 2nd it could mean how it happend naurlral selection 3rd ( the one peapol can get confused with ) the apsance of adevine being ( witch i reuled out earlyer ) now u can put idaas 1 and 2 to gearter but u cant stick 3 in also becuse it is not sien tifick NOT SICENTIFICK u cant argue that theogloy with proof like afossal record cause it is theoogical only

Jesusfreek, FaithForum.org 17 Comments [9/1/2003 12:00:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 3

Quote# 4273

ther is an apsence of of transianal forms in the record and the sudden apprecrance of a new spicheies and most improtanly there is no evdance ther there is any spicheies that evolved it to a diffent spicies ( we are obously difernt from monkies ) how many birdes do u know turn it to elphants whoah there beaks are diffrent mabe that has soem thing to do with the food they eat they did not cahnge spichies ther are still fichnes.

Jesusfreek, FaithForum.org 31 Comments [9/1/2003 12:00:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 8

Quote# 4274

It is not a fallacy to argue that a proposition which is widely held to be true despite lack of definite knowledge is more likely to be true than a proposition which is not as widely held to be true despite lack of definite knowledge. Like betting on the popular horse.

long winded fool, Internet Infidels 11 Comments [9/1/2003 12:00:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 0

Quote# 4275

When most people thought that the earth was flat, it was more likely that it was. It actually wasn't, but it was more likely that it was at the time. Any caveman who thought the earth was round wasn't thinking rationally. The fact that he was later proven right is nothing more than a fluke...

long winded fool, Internet Infidels 5 Comments [9/1/2003 12:00:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 1

Quote# 4276

He didn't have enough information to come to the correct conclusion, therefore he ought to have concluded the same thing that everyone else concluded. It was the safest bet. And it turned out to be wrong. This is the whole point of Pascal's Wager, if you'll recall. If you're wrong, it's better to be on the safe side.

long winded fool, Internet Infidels 2 Comments [9/1/2003 12:00:00 AM]
Fundie Index: -1

Quote# 4277

I think you misunderstand what I am getting at. Is it pessimistic to state what everyone can observe? That men are sinful, and it is man who is a 'failure' not the teaching of Scripture. That all systems of gov't are bound to fail if they depend on men? The purpose of Scripture is not to provide us with a 'foolproof' legal system, it is to show us that we have no hope apart from Jesus.

berniew, Glock Talk Forum 1 Comments [9/1/2003 12:00:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 1

Quote# 4278

They talk about how wonderful science is and all that science has done for mankind. But what about the real world... Is it not all a little bit like the wisard of oz... Then you had the yellow brick road, that went to emerald city, where Dorthy could find Mr Science, the Wisdard. Did he have an answer for Dorothy?

JohnR7, Christian Forums 14 Comments [9/1/2003 12:00:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 4

Quote# 4279

I am saying point blank that science does not always deliver on all they say they can deliever on. Ask any doctor when they have to tell a parent that their child is going to die and there is nothing they can do about it.

JohnR7, Christian Forums 14 Comments [9/1/2003 12:00:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 4

Quote# 4280

Yeah, you study away. Enjoy yourself, have a good time. Mean while people are dying and what are we doing to solve world hunger? Or are we do busy trying to figure out if man evolved with the ape or not.

JohnR7, Christian Forums 11 Comments [9/1/2003 12:00:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 5

Quote# 4376

How about you produce a human from a primate. You choose. Any primate. Have at it and get back to me. ;) Seriously, evolve me something. Not a fly from a fly or dog from a dog, but a real evolution like is required for your 'theory'. Primate to human, lizard to bird, cow to whale, fish to frog, reptile to mammal. I want to OBSERVE it happen, see the TEST results, and be able to REPRODUCE it. Those are, after all, the steps of the Scientific Method. Anything less would fall outside science and into philosophy (or science fiction).

Rom831, Rapture Ready 13 Comments [9/1/2003 12:00:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 4

Quote# 4377

Your posts indicate you to be an intelligent person so I have to believe you understand the truth in this. So either you have for so long been dishonest about this whole thing that you have actually lied yourself into really believing all that malarky, or you know full well it [evolution] is garbage and just insist on it because 'it has to be true' or else your faith fails and you are desperate to hold onto it. Even if it means sacrificing real science in the name of your faith.

Rom831, Rapture Ready 3 Comments [9/1/2003 12:00:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 0

Quote# 4378

It stands that evolution (not chromosomes, fossils, dna, etc which are not evolution) has never been observed, tested or recreated of which all are part of the requirements of the scientific method which real science stands on. Continuing this further is merely beating a dead horse.

Rom831, Rapture Ready 11 Comments [9/1/2003 12:00:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 4

Quote# 4379

Either way, evolve me something, and then repeat it until there are no discrepancies. Oh, and I personally believe the rapture is going to happen within the next 30 years so ya' gotta hurry...

Rom831, Rapture Ready 9 Comments [9/1/2003 12:00:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 2

Quote# 4380

Darwinism on the other hand, claims I fell off the monkey tree. Seeing that my hands don't look like my feet, I remain unconvinced.

HeIsEnough, Rapture Ready 12 Comments [9/1/2003 12:00:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 8

Quote# 4381

They are black and white... no middle ground. Jesus didn't evolve from frogs. If he did, he can't 'save' anyone.

joelch2, Rapture Ready 14 Comments [9/1/2003 12:00:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 7

Quote# 4382

Wrong again [on evolution not being a religion]. One definition for religion is 'A cause, principle, or activity pursued with zeal or conscientious devotion.' That is not watered down, it is straight from the dictionary and like it or not, fits evolution/billions of years to a tee. Pouting won't change it.

Rom831, Rapture Ready 12 Comments [9/1/2003 12:00:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 6

Quote# 4383

All I can say is if you have a problem with the definition of 'religion', you need to take it up with Mr. Webster. Its his definition, not mine.

Rom831, Rapture Ready 2 Comments [9/1/2003 12:00:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 1

Quote# 4384

[Replying to 'did you look up equivocation?']So the dictionary uses expressions with double meanings with the purpose to mislead. Riiiiight....

joelch2, Rapture Ready 2 Comments [9/1/2003 12:00:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 2

Quote# 4385

Sorry, its not equivicationg unless its the dictionary doing it.... anyone who follows this board... can see both sides pursue their cause with zeal and conscientious deovotion. There is no equivication, it just is. So stop pouting.

Rom831, Rapture Ready 1 Comments [9/1/2003 12:00:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 1

Quote# 4386

Christians use only factual information that can be proved historically and <u>chemically and logically</u>&nbsp; and no one wants to accept it? [Emphasis added]

bibleguy321, PlanetWisdom 11 Comments [9/1/2003 12:00:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 3

Quote# 4387

Evolution and the Big gang theory is LOADS younger than Christianity. How can something survive so long if its not true?

bibleguy321, PlanetWisdom 11 Comments [9/1/2003 12:00:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 2

Quote# 4388

Very true. It would make sense that our DNA is most like an ape's, since we are <u>the most closely related</u>, but this doesn't mean we evolved form an ape.&quot; [Emphasis added]

RelientKGirl, PlanetWisdom 6 Comments [9/1/2003 12:00:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 3

Quote# 4389

I bet most, if not all, of the non-believers here would say thats absurd, and they hate God.

r8ermang, Rapture Ready 5 Comments [9/1/2003 12:00:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 1

Quote# 4390

lol, I love those arguments, '[Y]ou can't prove That God exists by looking at the bible, that's circular reasoning'... that's like saying you can't look into the white house to prove the president exists

HOTTEST DIGGEDY DOG EVER, Kyle Givler Teens' Board 15 Comments [9/1/2003 12:00:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 4

Quote# 4391

A long time ago there was a Bang. a rock then formed into an aluminam can, (over millions of years) then Paint fell from the sky and formed itself into Coca cola 12 fluid ounces, then the can formed a tab and so on

HOTTEST DIGGEDY DOG EVER, Kyle Givler Teens' Board 10 Comments [9/1/2003 12:00:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 2