Here I sit again, ready to dispel the evolving myths of evolution. Just recently I remember reading an article in a scientific journal explaining how when you breed a Tiger with Lion, you get a "Liger". A mix between the two giant cats. Interestingly enough, these "Ligers" are sterile, which demonstrates that you cannot mix two species of animal and get another species. It doesn't happen.
If you breed Lions for thousands of generations, the results will always be a lion. If you breed tigers for thousands of generations, the results will always be a tiger. The moment you mix the two species together, you get a sterile animal. Another nail in the coffin for evolution.
But this is just of course one of the many flaws regarding Evolution, common sense indicates that complex organs such as the eye, wings, cannot evolve by chance. But not according to evolution which wants us to believe everything is by chance. By chance. This is akin to suggesting that a tornado ripping through a junkyard will cause the flying debris will assemble themselves into working jet airliner. Silly, isnt it? Not only is it silly, it's flat out impossible. Anyone can look at a Jet Airliner and come to the conclusion that it had a creator. Someone created the parts, and assembled it. It did not happen by chance.
But even ignoring the above, one merely has to look at what evolution really says to arrive at the conclusion that it's just bogus. Evolution is best defined(according to biologists) as the "change in allele frequency over given populations". Anyone with even minimal knowledge about biology and genetics should immediately recognize that that definition has not been directly observed. They'll suggest that evolution is correct because well, you can breed traits into animals, such as a better milk producing cow, or hairless cats. Seeing that their theory was in trouble, they needed to explain this, so they called it "microevolution". So they claim we can observe microevolution, but not macroevolution(a more larger step). Well, any attempts to recreate macroevolution have failed. If you'll recall my story of the Liger(bred between a tiger and a lion), as it is simply sterile. Where does this leave us? Well, it means evolution simply doesn't occur. At least according to their own definition.
And yet, even beyond these overwhelming mounds of evidence, we see people fighting for the right to teach it. Fighting for the right to say its fact, when it's simply hogwash! I predict it will only be a few years until we finally rid our school cirriculum of evolution. Replace the theory with something more plausible, intelligent design.
jeff & eddie, FileFront Gaming Forums 52 Comments
[5/13/2007 12:00:00 ]
Fundie Index: 6