[This was Byers' summary dismissal of evidence for African hominid ancestry based upon nothing more than the refusal of said evidence to genuflect before his worthless mythology based doctrine ... oh, and enjoy the part where he claims, Supersport style, that DNA isn't responsible for morphological change, but somehow changes after the fact to reflect it ... all in his usual inimitable style, namely that of sub-crayon literacy]
Ok I listened to most of it and its old info to me. I think I've seen this guy everywhere with this genetic stuff. In fact I think he did one about connecting Australians natives with India. Another story.
Africa again. Nonsense. It was from Babel down the road from the mts of Ararat.
All these conclusions are based on the dna trail.
Well I dismiss the trail because I insist sudden changes in the body bring atomic alignment changes that change dna.
I insist marsupials are just minor adaptations from placentals. Different dna from the change incident and not a dna heritage of the marsupial creatures. just the change revamped everything.
So likewise in human black Africa. At least two peoples went to Africa, according to the bible, and they would of instantly had to change to the new envirorment. Instant black and other details and later details. so different people groups had to radically change and this would include dna change. Other peoples in the world only changed their dna to a lesser degree from the original from babel. The black African body is the most different from everyone else. many details.
These genetic ideas are based on presumptions of long slow process drift. If change is instant and flexible then the trail is false.
The best way to track mankinds movements is by language. The african langiages can probably be brought down to just a few original ones. The centre for diversity in languages is in Asia just about old babel. Thats the origin of mankinds migrations.
Robert Byers, Richard Dawkins Forums 30 Comments
[8/28/2008 7:50:54 AM]
Fundie Index: 3
Submitted By: Calilasseia