Home Archives Random Quotes Latest Comments Top 100 Submit Quote Search Log In
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Quote# 62318

No, God's Penis is not a biological organ. I never said God's Penis was the same as man's penis. Obviously it wouldn't be. That is why I pointed out God has a Holy, Righteous Penis. That is to say, it's not the same as man's corrupted, fleshy one.

As I said when this subject first came up, once again: Penises are not just for sex & peeing. It is only because man is evil that he thinks of penises exclusively in those terms.

Man is made in the image of God the Father. That is the primary reason why man has a penis.

You cannot insert your evil prejudicial ideas of man's penis onto God - which is exactly what you are doing. God's Penis is not equal to man's penis. It's really not hard to understand.


Navaros, IMDB 322 Comments [5/15/2009 11:46:44 AM]
Fundie Index: 445
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 62311

By the way, why did the carp not evolve over a 200 million year period? If evolution is a reality where did it go with the carp? I guess that evolution just decided to take a break with the carp since he was rather tried from all that work with them other creatures. Does gravity take a break with some folks, I never heard of gravity failing to work, why did evolution fail to work with the carp if evolution is as solid a fact as is gravity?

Saul25, ThEndTimes 63 Comments [5/15/2009 12:32:03 AM]
Fundie Index: 44
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 62298

What is the difference between a muslim and a liberal?? I am just curious to know other viewpoints on this. It seems to me that they all seem to have the spirit of antichrist. Can you guys help me with this, and is it wrong for me to put them in the same category????
[head scratching smilie.]

Kvat3r, Rapture Ready 60 Comments [5/15/2009 12:19:21 AM]
Fundie Index: 68
Submitted By: Agrippina
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 62302

[In a topic concerning "gay week" at Walt Disney World]

Indeed. With most homosexuals, probably not all, but most, everything is about sex. They want us to think its all about love, but it's not. It's all about lust and being as in your face with there perversion as they can get. And its just disgusting that they want to do what they do in a place where people go with their children so they can just shove it in our faces even more. I think that's what most people have a problem with. By being out and open and in our faces, they ARE bothering us by influencing our children and making a mockery of the traditional values our nation was founded on. I know I don't want my daughter exposed to that kind of behavior in any way because, like you said, it's NOT okay.

baileysmom, Rapture Ready 73 Comments [5/14/2009 11:45:14 AM]
Fundie Index: 39
Submitted By: nintendofreakgcn
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 62276

The septic system is just another invention and if it was needed God himself would have placed it on earth when he created all things that humans needed to live. All the inventions ever made do not improve apon Gods work as you can not improve perfection.

Genex, Rapture Ready 92 Comments [5/13/2009 10:49:58 PM]
Fundie Index: 87
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 62283

[If your god revealed to you in a set of flawless communications you could not dispute that you should kill every child you see under the age of 2, would you?]

I don't see what the problem is, or why people were avoiding this last night. I mean, of course it's supposed to be a trap but it's a toothless one of no concern to any sufficiently intelligent individual. The answer is yes, and how would you possibly take issue with that position regardless of whether you believe in my god or don't believe in any god?

If I am correct that my God is the Creator God, that we are all his creations, then killing every child under two on the planet is no more inherently significant than a programmer unilaterally wiping out his AI-bots in a game universe. He alone has the right to define right and wrong, and as the Biblical example of King Saul and the Amalekites demonstrates, He has occasionally deemed it a moral duty to wipe out a people.

And as we are informed in Revelation, He will wipe out many peoples through the acts of (presumably) His angels. Jefferson can complain that this makes God unworthy of worship all he likes, but that's as irrelevant as complaining that Stalin wasn't properly elected according to the Soviet Constitution. Although in this case it isn't might makes right, it is a much simpler case of might = right. Obey or perish.

Vox Day, Vox Populi 99 Comments [5/13/2009 1:23:57 PM]
Fundie Index: 135
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 62261

Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.

Enochs fire, Topix 59 Comments [5/13/2009 12:14:35 PM]
Fundie Index: 51
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 62216

Can Devils Inhabit Material Objects?

The unwitting and unlearned in these things may imagine that an idol fabricated to represent the real Satan (aka the Devil) is just another inanimate object, even if it is an ugly and repulsive object. But the human imagination is often deceived. The devil and his demon cohorts have the power to literally enter and possess an unregenerated, that is, unsaved, person's brain and mind. From that point on, the devil (or, demon) is a type of "walk-in," possessing and directing the physical human entity.

Foreign spiritual entities are also able to supernaturally co-exist within many other material items, ranging from satanic paintings to voodoo dolls, witchcraft trinkets, charms, and talismans, and including ungodly designed furnishings and décor and malevolently wicked, symbolic jewelry and clothing.

Just as an invisible cyberforce (artificial intelligence) animates and operates advanced robots and other computerized electromechanical gadgets and machines, invisible spiritual entities likewise are able to inhabit, activate, and energize (e.g. "possess") organic materials. Advanced technology is, therefore, often indistinguishable from psychic and spiritual phenomena.

I have heard of voodoo dolls, occult books and figurines, and other satanic artifacts (including album covers of satanic, heavy metal, rock 'n' roll music groups) literally screaming and crying out when thrown into the fires. No wonder, then, that the early Christian Church gathered up pagan and witchcraft books and materials (curious arts) and cast them into the burning flames.

Texe Marrs, Power of Prophesy 79 Comments [5/13/2009 10:22:12 AM]
Fundie Index: 48
Submitted By: Grigori Yefimovich
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 62267

When we get to Heaven, you'll easily find me. I'll be the tall blonde hanging on to Jesus' feet and not letting go!! He'll be shaking me off his legs like a dog!!

chicken5516, Rapture Ready 112 Comments [5/13/2009 7:15:33 AM]
Fundie Index: 102
Submitted By: Jezebel's Evil Sister
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 62215

The Bible says everything that has breath has a right to praise the Lord. But there are some times when the Scripture commands woman to shut up!

First, they are commanded to shut up concerning the Authority of the Church. I Timothy 2:12 tells us that a woman is not to usurp authority over the man. God never has called a woman to preach. I know some "mainline" churches are ordaining woman to pastor their churches. Even radio and television are now promoting female pastor's. What a sad day, seeing woman open the bible and expound the scriptures. Eve, in the Garden of Eden, in a perfect surrounding could not even quote on verse correct. I sure would not trust a woman to expound truth in this sin cursed mess we live in. Some sorry Baptist Churches are now letting woman teach men and boys classes. No wonder America has turned "Sodomite". Too many young men have had too many woman as their voice of authority.

Second, they are commanded to shut up concerning the Administration of the Church. Usually when I start dealing with the business of leadership in the church most pastor's bow their heads. Why? Because Pastor's all across this this land are allowing woman to hold positions that they have no right to hold. It makes me sick to watch a woman stand on a platform and lead a choir with men in it, or even worse to see a woman lead the whole congregation! Singing is an important part of the worship service. This office is not a calling, but it should be led by a man with leadership ability.

...Third, women are commanded to shut up concerning the Apparel of the Church. 11 Timothy 2:9 commands the woman to dress in modest apparel. I have personally seen that in a large percentage of churches, the long tongued, rebellious, bobbed-haired, preacher-hating, pants-wearing, liberal-minded women have determined the standard of dress for the church. The cowardly preacher is afraid to cross this group. He knows if he does, these loud-mouthed women will take their weak husbands and go to another church. Sadly, most woman pull their hair, grit their teeth, and even yell back when the preacher deals with modest dress. Some will even get mad just reading this article. I say to you, SHUT UP!

Dr. Phil Kidd, Fighting the Good Fight of Faith 84 Comments [5/13/2009 7:14:41 AM]
Fundie Index: 79
Submitted By: Martha P
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 62294

Strangle the bible-pimps with their own guts, and the sheeple will wander away, perhaps to grow.

Banning religion = banning thought?

Nope. Au contraire.

Grigadil, FSTDT Comments 91 Comments [5/12/2009 9:12:09 PM]
Fundie Index: -15
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 62195

I'll answer all of you questioning why it is not fair to a child.

Just the other day on Newsvine, there was an article about a BLACK COUPLE who adopted a WHITE DAUGHTER.

You would not believe what that couple went through and the father actually commented to the reporter - that why could a white family not step up so they did.

These people were not prejudiced. They did not discriminate. They welcomed their white daughter into their home. They even found her Irish family crest to help her identify with a culture too. However, the family was the constant butt of jokes and criticism. Some people actually asked the daughter if she was kidnapped.

The situation is that kids already have it tough. Kids are bullies if people are different.

The bottom line is that neither two men nor two women can produce a child. If that is the case, why should these types of couples be allowed to adopt one?

AND BY THE WAY, who said anyone was intolerant of a gay lifestyle? Just because I don't agree that they should be allowed to marry does not mean I am intolerant. I don't want them to be able to adopt children. PERIOD. Especially NAMBLA couples. I see no one has addressed that issue.

What I find intolerant are the gay people who try and shove their lifestyle down the rest of our throats. I don't tell you about my sexual orientation or my partners so why do I care about yours?

And finally - MOST AMERICANS DO NOT SUPPORT GAY MARRIAGE. That is a fact.

Apparently, Californians are smarter than the rest of you all.


Karen in Los Angeles, Newsvine 79 Comments [5/12/2009 7:33:05 PM]
Fundie Index: 58
Submitted By: Orlor
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 62254

cool. You'd think, though, that through millions of evolution that the human race would somehow mutate a gene that would produce a race that would have a longer than 70 year life span. I mean isn't "survival" the goal?

["Well considering the maximum life span for a human used to be early 30s, I think 70 is pretty impressive."]

Actually, it used to be in the hundreds and now has dwindled down to the 70's. Let's speak worldwide and not old west days. By your implication, live in the beginning would have to been measured in months or days and it's taken us millions of years to get to the 70's. A chart from the beginning until now would show that. Sure there would be ups and downs but the general slope of the graph would show either a constant upward slope or a downward slope.

Second law of thermaldynamics (never could spell that) says what?



Watchmen, Topix 76 Comments [5/12/2009 7:01:38 PM]
Fundie Index: 47
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 62228

[a FUndie goes to the Galapagos]

The islands abound with unusual life. Going there was a wonderful "animal experience" for all of us, for the animals show little fear of humans...

Evolutionists make much of the adaptation of land-based iguanas to ocean life. But is this evolution? No! The two rather different "species" freely interbreed in the wild. Evolution is about the origin of new species from existing species, but here we see the amalgamation of species, the opposite of evolution.

Evolutionists trumpet the several Galapagos finch "species" as arising by adaptation from one species. Creationists agree, but this did not happen through evolution. Normally the finch types segregate by lifestyle according to their beak shape, but in times of stress they interbreed and combine. No evolution here. The flightless cormorants are recognizably related to other species of cormorant on other continents, but these have lost the use of their wings. Since when is the loss of a useful structure an evolutionary development? The real question is how animals acquire wings in the first place, not how they lose them.

No, there is no evolution happening on the Galapagos Islands. They really are a showcase for creation. On display is God's wise creative design in preparing robust gene pools in each created "kind" that enable all of God's creatures to adapt and survive varying conditions.


John D. Morris, PhD, Institute for Creation Research 76 Comments [5/12/2009 8:14:53 AM]
Fundie Index: 65
Submitted By: Damned at Random
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 62275

(An excerpt from H. Con. Res. 121: Encouraging the President to designate 2010 as "The National Year of the Bible")

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Encouraging the President to designate 2010 as ‘The National Year of the Bible’.

Whereas the Bible has had a profound impact in shaping America into a great Nation;

Whereas deep religious beliefs stemming from the Old and New Testament of the Bible have inspired Americans from all walks of life, especially the early settlers, whose faith, spiritual courage, and moral strength enabled them to endure intense hardships in this new land;

Whereas many of our Presidents have recognized the importance of God and the Bible, including George Washington; Franklin D. Roosevelt; Harry Truman; John F. Kennedy; Ronald Reagan, who declared 1983 as ‘The National Year of the Bible’; and especially Abraham Lincoln, whose 200th Birthday Celebration in 2009 highlighted freedom for the slaves;

Whereas shared Biblical beliefs unified the colonists and gave our early leaders the wisdom to write the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution of the United States, both of which recognized the inherent worth, dignity, and inalienable rights of each individual, thus unifying a diverse people with the right to vote, and the freedoms of speech and vast religious freedoms, which inspired courageous men like Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. to lead the Civil Rights Movement;

Whereas the Bible has been the world’s best selling book since it was first published in English in 1526, and has influenced more people than any other book;


Rep. Paul Broun [R-GA], et al., Govtrack.us 67 Comments [5/11/2009 8:49:11 PM]
Fundie Index: 53
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 62268

[Distind Note to clear things up:
Yes, there are atheist fundies. Just because I agree with your basic stance doesn't mean you can't still manage to be an idiot, or even a fundie. You'll note the explicit mention that one does not have to be religious to be a fundie in the definition found in the FAQ]

Eric Conway is a twit and shouldn't be allowed to think, he might give himself a hernia. All religions, including Catholicism, are evil and immoral, encourage non-thinking and obedience to the words of mentally insane old men. Old men who are filthy in mind and scrabulously deranged. Old men who condone the scribblings of older generations of demonic goat-molesters and propagate their sheer ignoble idiocies through asinine speech or moronic drivel masquerading as religious text.

Religion is especially harmful to children and governments, and should be decried at every opportunity, even banned.

Pule Thamex, FSTDT Comments 191 Comments [5/11/2009 8:43:36 PM]
Fundie Index: -95
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 62184

Men are the cause of all the worlds problems. religion was created by men to control women, though now we have the one true religion, wicca.

Why cant you stupid men get it through your thick skulls that you are not thinkers. You are soldiers, women are thinkers. All male thinkers in history actually stole the work of women. Many of her contemporaries took credit for the work of hypatia, einstien stole from Marrie Curry, aristotole, socrities and plaato were all compilations of great female thinkers.

The spartans had the right idea, although it was still men on the council but they had the right idea forcing men to be warriors. Just give up, admit you are all dumb and know your role.

Bianca C, Yahoo! Answers 121 Comments [5/11/2009 12:02:30 PM]
Fundie Index: 90
Submitted By: Ode to the Damned
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 62150

Are there any socialist countries that have maintained robust free speech rights and freedom of religion? I can't think of any. It seems the trend of all socialist countries is to curb speech and/or religion to some extent. China is an extreme example, while what you see in England is the start of a slippery slope.

So I wonder, why would any thinking Christian ever support socialism? It is beyond me.


Andy T., Baptist Board 62 Comments [5/11/2009 12:01:53 PM]
Fundie Index: 15
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 62138

The MSM has become 100x more cruel than it ever has been in just the last 2 years (Satan)

Our current president is forcing everyone to not only pay for infanticide in our own country, but in other countries as well, he disses people who "cling" to their Bibles, he has a hateful attitude towards Christianity in general, and wants to destroy the the country who has always had freedom of religion (Satan)

We actually had thousands of people who profess to be Christians voting for said president (Satan)

A girl in CA has had her character completely assasinated b/c she said she doesn't believe in gay marriage, who otherwise would've been hailed as beautiful had she said otherwise. Just 3 years ago, not only would this question not have been asked of her, but it wouldn't have been all over the news (Satan)

Our states are continuing to sanction the idea of becoming little Sodoms at a RAPID pace (Satan)

Our gov't just showed it's colors by calling people who believe in Bible prophesy and think infanticide is immoral "extremists." (Satan)

Unless you are a leftist, only an idiot would not know something very evil is in the air.

eta: maybe "leftist" and "idiot" are the same thing on second thought.

ShowUsTheFather, RaptureReady 61 Comments [5/11/2009 2:15:08 AM]
Fundie Index: 40
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 62136

Why in the name of God (oops sorry, didn't mean to be so insensitive/offensive), does RTE give an entire 'Liveline' over to a tiny rump of deranged atheists to spout their puerile propaganda? Just what is their gripe?

Well it turns out they are annoyed at the prospect that proposed legislation will make it an offence to gratuitously offend religion: in reality, Catholicism (their big bogeyman). The big question is, though, what kind of ideology gets it kicks out of gratuitously offending the sincerely held views of others? It seems both immature and vulgar.

Perhaps the best critique of this ideology is provided in the recently published 'The Irrational Atheist: Dissecting the Unholy Trinity of Dawkins, Harris, and Hitchens', by Vox Day.

This brilliant critique clearly demonstrates why a mere anti-blasphemy law is not sufficient. In the interests of rationality and common sense, the legislation should go further and label atheism a thought crime.

Eric Conway, Independent.ie, Letters  68 Comments [5/11/2009 2:13:52 AM]
Fundie Index: 72
Submitted By: Nightjaguar
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 62142

(quote #22)

Power to the people of Maine. VETO!!!! And i hope Gov. Lynch also has the courage to NOT sign NH's passage either. Soon enough, the marriage license is going to be just for gays, and hopefully conservative churches will push for a new form of christian marital registration, called the blessed union,and can only be signed by church leaders of conservative churches who still hold that the sanctity of marriage is between man and woman. And that too, shall be recognized by the government whether they like it or not. I truly hope churches support us believers of the marital faith of man and woman and join forces in creating the blessed union document, signed and sealed in the conservative faith.


M-356362, Newsvine 65 Comments [5/9/2009 9:49:45 AM]
Fundie Index: 47
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 62118

Alberta's student are already being prepared to leave behind failed 19th century pseudoscience like Evolutionism.
This is why they will be the future of science.

China and India are still stuck in the Evolutionist pseudoscience our Evofundies cursed them with... HOWEVER... don't be so sure they wont surpass us by dumping it, embracing ID and recognizing this is a creation as described in Genesis.
We are getting the jump on them now by preparing to say good-bye to Evolutionism which, as it is, is a useless pseudoscience that does nothing but drain time, money (tax-payers money) and effort from the real sciences.

*If I was an Indian or Chinese scientists wanting to compete with Canada, the UK and USA I suppose I'd be happy if the stupid westerners want to waste as much money and time on Evolutionism.

OriginalBigWhite , IMDB 80 Comments [5/9/2009 9:42:34 AM]
Fundie Index: 63
Submitted By: giz80
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 62103

Women should be wives and mothers first.
God CAN use them outside of that, but that isn't God's perfect will for them. So for a woman to be used of God the most and glorify Him the most, she must be a helpmeet to her husband and a Godly mother to her children.
Right?
It's like God can use a guy who was a drunk and killed all his brain cells and was in a wreck and lost both legs. But God could've used Him more had he responded to the stirring of the Holy Spirit when he was five at a VBS. That was God's perfect will, but He's still merciful in that when we fail to follow the first time He'll still use us.

JMorrow, Teens-4-Christ 78 Comments [5/9/2009 9:42:02 AM]
Fundie Index: 60
Submitted By: Scooby71
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 62090

Homosexuality wasn't always accepted,you know. Because people actually had that moral sense that it is wrong. But now, thanks to plenty of years of indoctrination, the next generation is more inclined to be gay because that sense of morality has been STOLEN from them!

Homosexuals will never know the true happiness, fulfillment, and love that a marriage can bring. I don't know care what kind of limelight they shine, its the counterfeit to what God created us for.

heart_changed99, Rapture Ready 52 Comments [5/9/2009 9:41:52 AM]
Fundie Index: 33
Submitted By: Eimiilove
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 62123

[In discussing the Large Hadron Collider]

I find it strangely humorous, that man will spend billions of dollars to find the starting of life, and all we spent was maybe forty dollars for a bible.

kcofohio, RR 89 Comments [5/8/2009 11:52:06 AM]
Fundie Index: 60
Submitted By: Gebusi
WTF?! || meh
1 2 3 4 5 6 7