Home Archives Random Quotes Latest Comments Top 100 Submit Quote Search Log In
1 2 3 4
Quote# 80350

I have two grandchildren: Maggie is 11; Robert is 9. I am convinced that if we do not decisively win the struggle over the nature of America, by the time they’re my age they will be in a secular atheist country, potentially one dominated by radical Islamists and with no understanding of what it once meant to be an American.

Newt Gingrich, cnn.com 108 Comments [3/31/2011 3:40:26 AM]
Fundie Index: 126
Submitted By: Tom S. Fox
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 80344

[Why healthcare is evil]

1. In order to fund health care, the government will have to take from those who work hard and give it to those who don’t. You can call it anything you want, but it’s stealing, and stealing is wrong, a sin. God hates sin, and He won’t tolerate it much longer.

2. The Founding Fathers considered government to be evil. They didn’t want to give us anymore government than necessary. So, they didn’t. They also rejected the principles of the Enlightenment, something in my opinion, is one of the darkest periods in history. There was nothing “enlightening” about it at all. It’s the same secular humanism that liberals are passing around today.

Jinger Jarrett, 101Christian Blog 289 Comments [3/31/2011 3:35:28 AM]
Fundie Index: 90
Submitted By: dionysus
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 80339

since evolution does not exist we will not be allowing any discussion about that false theory in this forum or website.

that does not mean that science cannot be discussed but it does mean that any mentioning of evolution is out. when scientists see reactions in their experiemnts, they are NOT seeing evolution in action but the result of God's creative work under the influence of the sin and corruption that entered the world at adam's sin.

that also means that there is no such thing as evolutionary biology, there is simply biology and this idea applies to all fields related to science.

do not bring evolutionary ideas into the forum, bring the truth and evolution, the process, the thinking is NOT the truth.

archaeologist, Dakota's Christian Forum 48 Comments [3/31/2011 3:28:37 AM]
Fundie Index: 83
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 80320

CP: Are you saying everyday Christians, students, business people, and homemakers as well as clergy should be expecting bias, intolerance or hostility in all areas of life including civil government, education, economics, public policy, and family?

Howse: Actually, if an individual who claims to be a Christian is not experiencing intolerance or persecution – being called names, belittled, marginalized, or characterized because you stand for sound theology – you should examine yourself to make sure you are a Christian.

Brannon Howse, Christian Post 77 Comments [3/30/2011 3:35:55 AM]
Fundie Index: 64
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 80317

eyeless cave fish are still cave fish (of the genus astyanax). The cave fish with eyes and the cave fish without are both of the same order of genus still. wikipedia states that they the same genus and even same species....."The eyed and eyeless forms of A. mexicanus, being members of the same species, are closely related and can interbreed. " They didn't change genre or kind at all. So this is not true evolution (on a macro scale.) It's just micro evolution, like getting over the flu virus. That happens all the time. I have a permanent change in my blood type. I had hepatitis A and can no longer donate blood at a blood bank. But I am still human because my body went through micro evolution. But true macro evolution still is un observed; and monkeys don't become humans (macro evolution) because they are different genre and different kinds of vertebrates. finally, even though species may evolve blindness they do not evolve eye sight (or the complete eye.) This is irreducibly complex and cannot evolve (similar to bacterial flagellum). Those are claims amongst evolutionists that are speculation and in dire need of evidence.
[emphasis added]


gradyll, CF 70 Comments [3/30/2011 3:35:26 AM]
Fundie Index: 89
Submitted By: Blackwater Babe
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 80305


Actors play murderers, robbers and gossips, but the gay lifestyle is always glorified. The other sins always seem to be punished or redeemed, but TV shows never show the downside to homosexuality: the loneliness, shame, broken families and marriages, diseases. The shame does not come from 'society' but from God. So, even if the gays get everyone in the world to accept their behavior as "normal," there will still be shame, because it goes against God. Unless sin numbs their soul and their heart turns to stone, they will hear the still, small voice of God saying, 'I have a better way.' I was asked to do a lesbian kiss in a show once, and I said no. But, I'm guilty of being part of a few movies that may have been a bad influence on young people. I'm very sorry to anyone I led away from God.

Victoria Jackson, Towleroad 60 Comments [3/30/2011 3:35:02 AM]
Fundie Index: 62
Submitted By: Aspergus
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 80311

Hang on, let me just tell you what I'm thinking. I'm thinking about killing Michael Moore, and I'm wondering if I could kill him myself, or if I would need to hire somebody to do it. No, I think I could. I think he could be looking me in the eye, you know, and I could just be choking the life out -- is this wrong? I stopped wearing my What Would Jesus -- band -- Do, and I've lost all sense of right and wrong now. I used to be able to say, "Yeah, I'd kill Michael Moore," and then I'd see the little band: What Would Jesus Do? And then I'd realize, "Oh, you wouldn't kill Michael Moore. Or at least you wouldn't choke him to death." And you know, well, I'm not sure.

Glenn Beck, Media Matters 81 Comments [3/29/2011 9:28:15 AM]
Fundie Index: 127
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 80201

There will always be a minority of women who dislike being mothers. They are freaks of nature. They are not necessarily to be blamed for their lack of maternal feelings. But they are to be blamed for celebrating abnormality. Rizzuto, like her feminist sisters, complains that society has standards for mothers at all.

Laura, The Thinking Housewife 79 Comments [3/28/2011 2:27:41 PM]
Fundie Index: 100
Submitted By: Balthazar The Wise
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 80303

No one on this earth KNOWS what the center of the earth is made of, because no one except God has reached the center of the earth.
No one but God KNOWS how big the center material of the earth is because NO ONE HAS EVER DRILLED THAT FAR!

Now, stop using baseless evolutionary theories taught in schools!
LOL
None of those THEORIES have ever been proven!
All those theories are completely baseless and unproven.
But, as I have said before, the power and belief system of evolution is so well guarded that governments and corporations are spending billions of dollars just to try to prove the Holy Bible is false!
But, their evolutionary theories are failing and falling apart, and these so called scientists hope more than anything that they can prove life exists outside of this planet.
Then, they will lie and say that there is life on other planets, and that THAT life is where we came from.

Go teach your evolutionary crap somewhere else, because I will keep on defending the Truth of Jesus Christ!

Mickey Smith (a.k.a. JESUSISGODTV), Cosmic Log Comments 86 Comments [3/28/2011 3:36:19 AM]
Fundie Index: 117
Submitted By: Jeff C.
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 80300

[Question - Explain how genetics supports Darwin's theory.?]

Best Answer - Chosen by Voters
It doesn't at all. If I cut off my arms because I no longer need them, my kids are not going to be born without arms. If I convince all my kids to cut off their arms because they don't need them their kids will not be born without arms. Even if my entire familly has been cutting off their arms for the past 999,999,999,999 billion years, guess what? Their kids will still be born with arms!!! The reason is we all have the genes to produce arms, some may be short or long or small or large, but we are gonna be born with arms. I don't care how much time the evolution religion gives it, humans will never be armless. We will never produce lobster claws to replace the arms because we don't have the genes for lobster claws.
Source(s):
common sense

fastest73torino, Yahoo! Answers 92 Comments [3/28/2011 3:34:27 AM]
Fundie Index: 129
Submitted By: Dubbleyew
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 80231

Can gay quotas be far behind? We’re going to get the worst of both worlds with the admission of open homosexuals into the ranks: virile straights aren’t going to sign up, and fewer homosexuals will since they lost their get-out-of-jail free card when DADT was repealed. They can’t try it and decide they don’t like it any more. We’re going to be left with a weakened, effeminate, dumbed-down military. Other than that, no worries.

Bryan Fischer, Rightly Concerned 60 Comments [3/27/2011 7:44:18 PM]
Fundie Index: 75
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 80183

We wouldn't need Intelligent Design if it weren't needed for defense against people with an agenda using science to "disprove" religion. The "proof" of human evolution is tenuous at best and there's a reason it's called a theory. If "informed" people would only admit that, the other side would relax their position. It's been my experience that those pushing hardest for the acceptance of "evolution" are almost exclusively homosexuals bent on "disproving" the bible and removing the foundation of society's values (especially that part that doesn't accept homosexuals).

Homosexual Frenzy, WMNF 88.5FM 57 Comments [3/27/2011 7:42:50 PM]
Fundie Index: 85
Submitted By: Damien
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 80287

Islam has no fundamental First Amendment claims, for the simple reason that it was not written to protect the religion of Islam. Islam is entitled only to the religious liberty we extend to it out of courtesy. While there certainly ought to be a presumption of religious liberty for non-Christian religious traditions in America, the Founders were not writing a suicide pact when they wrote the First Amendment.

Our government has no obligation to allow a treasonous ideology to receive special protections in America, but this is exactly what the Democrats are trying to do right now with Islam.

From a constitutional point of view, Muslims have no First Amendment right to build mosques in America. They have that privilege at the moment, but it is a privilege that can be revoked if, as is in fact the case, Islam is a totalitarian ideology dedicated to the destruction of the United States. The Constitution, it bears repeating, is not a suicide pact. For Muslims, patriotism is not the last refuge of a scoundrel, but the First Amendment is.

Bryan Fischer, Renew America 73 Comments [3/27/2011 5:44:36 AM]
Fundie Index: 111
Submitted By: Wehpudicabok
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 80275

[In response to P.Z. Myers saying he won't back down from his pro-choice position simply because he's shown a sign with an aborted fetus, because he's already seen blood and entrails while experimenting on/dissecting animals.]

It's probably a good thing he is an atheist without any moral standards, otherwise he might demonstrate at least a modicum of conscience for the bloody acts in which he appears to take such pride. And if he happened to take any sexual gratification from them as well, who can say it is wrong from his perspective, given his total lack of any moral or ethical code. If he feels no revulsion at looking at the pictures of butchered babies, then he likely feels no revulsion and sees only meat when looking at pictures of dead Jews and murdered Ukrainians as well. The awful thing is not that the pictures do not frighten him; they do not frighten me either. The awful thing is that he does not find them revolting like any normal human being with even a minimal amount of empathy would.

This is the naked face of atheism, ladies and gentlemen. Look on it well and remember it, because it usually doesn't dare to show its disgusting and anti-human nature so openly.

Vox Day, Vox Popoli 70 Comments [3/27/2011 5:41:04 AM]
Fundie Index: 91
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 80271

It just shows your faith. True Christians can laugh with joy when threatened with death. Most people think we are totally psychotic for that. We don't have a deathwish, we just know where we are headed is infinetely better if we do pass on somehow.

Christians should be the only people on the planet NOT afraid to die. I have a smile on my face all the time because of this knowledge. If I die, I WIN!

Not Perfect, But Forgiven, Rapture Ready 85 Comments [3/27/2011 5:40:50 AM]
Fundie Index: 57
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 80265

I still fail to see the point. What do you want to know? I already told you what my stand is. And yes, it's ALL retaliation based, because they have ALREADY ATTACKED. Muslims have been behind the BULK of terrorist attacks. I don't give a shit what you want to call them. Fanatics, Moderates, Militants, they're MUSLIMS. Period.

Innocent people have been under attack by that CULT for CENTURIES now. My position is KILL THEM!

What part are you having a hard time grasping?

You asking how? Well shit, lets see... we can invite them over, bake them some fuking cookies, read them some nursery rhymes out of a Mother Goose book...

WHAT do you not understand about KILL THEM?

Is there a POINT you are trying to make with this retarded thread? You just looking for another chance to show everyone how "enlightened" you are? Your attempt to "talk down" to the "uncivilized" among us?

Well kiddo... I AM UNCIVILIZED. When it comes to muslims, I SUPPORT A SCORCHED EARTH POLICY. I believe in fighting the enemy EXACTLY how he has decided to fight us. I say we hide behind rocks, and when one walks by, we jump out, yell surprise, and bash his fuking skull in like he was a baby seal! I support the deployment of nukes to the Middle East. NOT on flat bed truck, but under their own power. ONE WAY FLIGHTS! I propose anything over there within 10 feet of a Koran or Mosque be made to GLOW IN THE DARK!

Now, if THAT hasn't answered your question, then talk to someone else. I'm done with your idiotic attempt to try to stir up shit, just so you can show-case your supposed "peaceful superiority and enlightenment".

Gonzo67, Free Conservatives 87 Comments [3/27/2011 5:40:08 AM]
Fundie Index: 112
Submitted By: JohnTheAtheist
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 80259

Pastor had sex with teens to cure their homosexuality

A former youth pastor in Council Bluffs, Iowa, says he had sex with teenage boys because it was his pastoral duty “to help (the teen) with homosexual urges by praying while he had sexual contact with him.”

But law enforcement has a different view of his actions. Earlier this month, Brent Girouex, 31, was arrested on 60 counts of suspicion of sexual exploitation by a counselor or therapist, reported The Daily Nonpareil.

In February, Girouex told Council Bluffs police detectives that he had sexual contact with four young men starting in 2007 in order to help them gain “sexual purity in the eyes of God.”

But Pottawattamie County Attorney Matt Wilber told the Nonpareil that at least eight men have come forward with complaints that Girouex molested them.

Court documents indicated Girouex told investigators the most sexual contact he had was with one teen over a four-year period, starting when the boy was 14 years old. Calling the contact “mutual,” he said it had occurred between “25 and 50 times” during that period.

Brent Girouex, Wisconsin Gazette  53 Comments [3/27/2011 5:39:13 AM]
Fundie Index: 108
Submitted By: Night Jaguar
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 80250

Gays have every bit as much right to get married as you or I. And in fact, they should.

A homosexual man has an identical right to take a woman in holy matrimony as may any other man. Likewise, the rest of us have just as little right to take some guy and pronounce him a bride. This isn't a question of differing rights. Our rights remain in perfect symmetry. Homosexuals are now and always have been permitted to marry[...]

It doesn't matter how many moral lines are breached, the homosexual activists will keep agitating because it's not persecution they resist, but internal loathing projected outward. Social mores are merely a scapegoat. Tradition and virtue represent punching bags on which to relieve their rage. In truth, the Left wants not for gays to marry so much as to abolish the very concept of marriage.

Marriage is the foundation of coherent society and the conduit distilling our fallen natures into civilized community. Many studies reveal the correlation between marriage and everything from income generation, our children's academic achievement and lower crime rates. Undercutting the family exemplifies folly. The conventional family offers society its best chance to excel[...]

Rather than seek to undermine such a foundational institution necessary for healthy society, homosexuals ought to get married. Marriage would temper their urges and channel their desires into something beneficial for both them and society at large.

Bill Flax, American Thinker 43 Comments [3/27/2011 5:35:47 AM]
Fundie Index: 57
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 80208

Why do liberals embrace Shariah law even though "beheading your wife" seems to go against the feminist movement's mantra? Why do liberals embrace Islam knowing it frowns on homosexuality? Because they have the same goals. Progressives, communists, liberals, globalists and Muslims want to destroy America. When that goal is reached, they will fight for top billing. It will be bloody.

Victoria Jackson, World Net Daily 118 Comments [3/25/2011 3:18:50 AM]
Fundie Index: 120
Submitted By: gaijinlaw
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 80206

Why do we allow subhuman scum to exist here in These Great United States of America? We should exterminate any and all vermin who utter a wiff of a syllable of a word of a sentence extolling anything positive about communism and the like. And for you free speechers, its akin to yelling fire in a blind persons nursing home or a movie theater if you like!!
We could eliminate 95% of our problems here in the U.S. if it wer'nt for the dregs of society dragging us down with useless cry baby bullshit.
First lets start with anyone who votes democRATic; i.e. the most ignorant around us, democRATs, race card victims, looney loser lieberals and anybody that they deem victim status; i.e. gays, most coloreds, the envirnoment, mother earth, women, who sit on the most powerful entity in the world (its in their pants people)!!!
But alas I dream of a utopia of which this world will never relize. Or Will It?!!!

Joek Loth, Moonbattery 121 Comments [3/25/2011 3:15:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 169
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 80197

What Has Feminism Really Done To Us?

God presents Himself in Scripture as male. He wants us to know Him in this way. He sent His SON (not daughter) to die for us. The intent of the Feminists is obvious. They wish first to destroy gender difference in our human relations and then to feminize the very nature of how God presents Himself to our sense.

But other areas are as important:

To maintain sanity, we need to return language to common usage.

We have policemen and policewomen. Policewoman implies, by her physical weakness up against a man, that she is physically less. If there is a burglar in your house, you don’t want to hear the dispatcher say “we’re sending the policewoman right out”!

We have pilots and pilotesses. If the plane is in trouble and the hydraulic system is out (which will require massive male strength to get the plan down), you don’t want to hear “this is the pilotess speaking, and I can’t control, with my limited upper body strength, this plane any longer”!!!

If you’re on the roof of a burning building, you don’t want to hear the little voice of a firewoman holler “jump, I’ll catch you”!

Walter Schneider, Fathers For Life 120 Comments [3/24/2011 8:15:43 AM]
Fundie Index: 161
Submitted By: WickedWitch
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 80194

Back when I was a New Ager, I had Reiki massage in Minneapolis. Never again! I believe her cat was demonized! I never otherwise saw a cat, which sat on the arm of the couch, nod when I was speaking to it's owner. It acted like it knew what I was talking about. That cat was looking me in the eye like it was a person, nodding away. Freaky!

ComeLordJesus, RR 81 Comments [3/24/2011 8:11:26 AM]
Fundie Index: 87
WTF?! || meh

The "Love thy Neighbor" Award

Quote# 80189

["Won't the common grace from God, the morality of people, prevent pedophilia from becoming legal?"]


No. Most people secretly want pedophilia to become legal so they can either egnage in it or profit from it. Nine of every ten people you meet, both within the church and without, are sexual perverts just waiting for their wicked lifestyle to become accepted as normal activity. I'd be willing to bet there are even people on these boards who are just chopping at the bits for this to be legal, though they would never admit it.

mattd, Online Baptist 92 Comments [3/24/2011 8:08:48 AM]
Fundie Index: 148
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 80164

MEDIA, Pennsylvania – A 70-year-old man was stoned to death with a rock stuffed in a sock by a younger friend who alleged the victim made unwanted sexual advances, authorities said.

According to the criminal complaint, John Thomas, 28, of a Philadelphia suburb, told police he killed Murray Seidman of nearby Lansdowne because the Bible refers to stoning homosexuals.

"I stoned Murray with a rock in a sock," Thomas told police, according to the criminal complaint.

Thomas was arrested and charged with murder Friday.

According to the complaint, "John Thomas stated that he read in the Old Testament that homosexuals should be stoned in certain situations. The answer John Thomas received from his prayers was to put an end to the victim's life. John Thomas stated that he struck the victim approximately 10 times in the head. After the final blow, John Thomas made sure the victim was dead."

"He is a deeply religious man. Or so he says," said Lansdowne Police Chief Dan Kortan.
Delaware County Medical Examiner Fredric Hellman ruled that Seidman had been dead for five to 10 days before Thomas started banging on doors in the hallway of Seidman's apartment building on Jan. 12.

Police said Thomas, who is the executor and sole beneficiary of Seidman's will, returned to the apartment and pretended that he had just discovered Seidman's body.

John Thomas, Fox News 73 Comments [3/23/2011 3:29:30 AM]
Fundie Index: 125
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 80154


"It might be true that a husband will be more likely to slap his wife, force her to have sex with him, or commit some other form of low-level violence, than a stranger would. But using that as an argument against marriage is like saying we need to encourage children to be autonomous from their parents because they are more likely to hit their children than a stranger would. At some point, people have to interact on an intimate level, and the bonds of marriage and family provide the safest place for that interaction.

Let us also note that — barring repetition of the act — it is less traumatic for a child to be slapped by his mother than by a stranger, for a man to be punched by his brother than by a stranger, or for a woman to be sexually assaulted by her husband than by a stranger. Anytime you remove the danger of the first case by weakening family bonds, you increase the likelihood of the second case. When considering whether to remove a dependent from a family situation, we should be very careful that we are not putting them in an even more dangerous situation, or at the mercy of people who don’t have their best interests at heart."


Alte, Traditional Catholicism  72 Comments [3/23/2011 3:27:23 AM]
Fundie Index: 87
Submitted By: AtroposHeart
WTF?! || meh
1 2 3 4