*scoff*
They had their chance. My parting shot below.
...
Fading Light, I notice that you: 1) Only kept as much of the post that pertained to you directly when I also addressed The Tyrant's talk of genetics. 2) Erased discussion of how little difference a strictly controlled social and ethnic environment actually makes i.e. gated communities and how impossible that is to compare to life in a city. 3) Are quite adamant in choosing which trends you care about when more notable statistics include white on white violence to an almost exclusive degree, going as far to selectively remove emphasis in my reference to the murder of Kriss Donald to the sheer rarity of ethnic on white crime for which it made its way into Scottish history while keeping the mention itself to imply it is a large factor there. You also neglect the fact that Glasgow is the poorest city in Scotland where your detractors most often highlight crime and poverty go hand in hand though you prefer to shift blame on race instead despite being more consistent than any ethnic makeup. There weren't a lot of African or Arabic peasants in white countries in the middle ages but there were quite the number of violent peasant revolts and highwaymen. Notably I did appear to confuse statistics for the region with the city itself which is the only substantial point you have made thus far, being otherwise prone to disjointed non-sequitors that have little to do with what was said. For example the nonsensical tirade you launched into when I balked at your insistence that you exclusively have the right to take offense to history. 4) Are generally dismissive and deliberately misinterpretive despite a supposedly open invitation to debate.
Your ego would not be so grating if you had the common decency not to manipulate the thread to satisfy it.
I have made an attempt to keep to civility while you have thrown words like retard around. I have also refrained from questioning your intelligence even when you say things like white culture being essentially uniform which is absurd on its face even if you somehow manage to overlook several centuries of conflict between Europe's largest military powers. Would you ever describe English cuisine as a fanciful series of subtleties they are overly proud of? Could their culture be described as sexually permissive or focused on arts over industry and science? Would you describe French familial ideals as disciplinarian with a taste for children's stories that curdle the blood? Are pantomime or situational comedy noted staples of German entertainment? Voltaire, Nietzsche, and Tennyson all draw from the same common inspiration? The Protestant church is indistinguishable and indivisible from the Catholic? Could you picture the average American as a staunch supporter of French society's preference for comprehensive government involvement in social security and welfare? Or respecting the remaining vestiges of Britain's aristocratic titled social structures? Or wanting anything at all to do with strict German gun control? If you can honestly think the difference between their value systems is negligible that only betrays your overwhelming disrespect for them.
And that's not even taking into account Russian culture as some refuse to acknowledge them as white, an attitude that some similarly take with the Irish.
Art, philosophy, family, religion, military doctrine, social structuring and taboos, all are drastically different between these populations. And it only gets worse if I suspend my disbelief that genetics play into culture for genetic variance readily apparent in physical appearance. Among the most visible indicators being the prevalence of hair and eye colour. Germans take a fair bit of pride in their blonde hair and blue eyes - more broadly fair haired and clear eyed - but in Britain and France more darkly coloured hair and eyes were the rule. This has interestingly changed in Britain recently with a surge in the number of individuals with clear eyes and I'm sure it would be amusing to read your theories on why that is.
But that's enough of indulging your vanity for now.
The Tyrant, since Fading Light decides which conversations you will engage in for you I'll have to rephrase this in a way that doesn't bore them if you're going to have a chance to consider it this time around. Quite disrespectful towards her fellow Stormfronter not to give you the chance to refute me yourself, though I suppose that's in keeping with your attitudes towards equality for her to subvert control of your interactions. My question is this: If culture and criminal mentality is genetically heritable then please tell me how Australia managed to grow from a penal colony the UK exiled dangerous felons to die in to a unique culture with its own established rule of law. If your premise were solid every white man in the Outback would be a violent career criminal incapable of reform. Also I will quickly restate that I said I believed genetics play as much role as environment in what we become, not that they were totally irrelevant as you claimed though I maintain skepticism that cognitive function more rudimentary than animal instinct such as flight or fight, group empathy, and autonomous response let alone highly specific psychological framework. Things like paranoia, aggressive confrontational tendencies, and an obsession with controlling one's surroundings appear to be heritable as children with parents who display these traits may show signs themselves even if they are raised in a different family altogether but the results are not as uniform as to conclude direct cause and effect. The most accurate way to say it is that the potential is there. However "potential" is a very flexible concept for people that view race as you do. If you are interested and Fading Light's ego permits it I can go into detail on that claim. If not, then this was a waste of both of our time and seeing just how well people at Stormfront treat their principles and the people who share them leaves me the only one satisfied.
...
Sorry Distind. Did I mention I was plastered?
