Medical analysis of millions of post-9/11 New York cancer patients; 9/11 first respondents, firefighters, rescue workers, cleanup crew, residents, commuters and especially Wall Street brokers, indicate that 9/11 attack was a nuclear event. This indication was emphasized by Russian Intelligence leaks claiming that dirty nuclear bombs were used by nuclear capable Israeli Mossad, rather than by primitive cave dweller Osama bin Laden, to vaporize the Twin Trade Towers.
13 comments
Hmm.
Well, If a pony bomb had been used, all kinds of New Yorkers and not just first responders would have shown evidence of radiological warfare. I get free medical care via the VA and I lived and live in NYC. Nothing so far to indicate a nuclear event.
If a mini-nuke had been used, substantial chunks of the towers would have come down in Jersey, Connecticut, Rhode Island. Explosives, especially nukes, are a bit more energetic.
Oh, and you got this info naming the Mossad as the perpetrators from the Russian Intelligence Service? Fuck, when did we start buying their BS as the absolute truth? The last time the Russian secret police said anything about Jews, it was via that forgery, the Protocols of the Elders of Zion.
Why don't you explain to us exactly how a "dirty bomb" works, and what the point of using one would be. Why don't you explain to us exactly how we can tell the effects of a dirty bomb from the effects of a conventional bomb, or the effects of say, planes crashing into the towers causing collapse due to fires weakening the remaining steel columns.
And all of the thousands of pictures just missed the mushroom cloud, and all of the tests just missed all of the radiation and fallout. Sounds perfectly plausible.
@#1758004
A mushroom cloud is not some magical indicator that something is a nuke. ANY explosion causes a mushroom, with enough debris in the air currents caused by an explosion. Most explosions are too small and quick for it to be visible, but any strong enough explosion creates a large enough push of air to pick up enough debris to be visible.
You don't need to be nuclear capable to produce dirty bombs. You can make them with unrefined uranium, yellow cake uranium, radium, hospital grade cesium.
Really, anything with a decent half life and a beta decay mixed in with a conventional explosive is a dirty bomb. The conventional explosive does all the exploding and that sends particles of hot, possibly vaporized, radioactive stuff into every lung in some multiplier of the blast radius.
The number of countries that could produce a dirty bomb is far, far higher than the number of countries that are nuclear capable.
Also, if it was a nuclear attack it would be detectable by Columbia "We're why the Manhattan Project is called the Manhattan Project" University in Manhattan or Stonybrook University on Long Island.
Both have well recognized nuclear physics programs with well funded labs and experienced professors. Both are within and hours' drive from the World Trade Center (assuming you don't go during mid-day traffic).
One, if you used a dirty bomb to blow up the Twin Towers, you would've vaporised the majority of Manhattan.
Two, Osama bin Laden was never a "primitive cave dweller", considering he came from one of the wealthiest families in Saudi Arabia and lived in various well-equipped houses throughout his life with the exception of the time he was chased from Afghanistan by the sudden US invasion.
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.