[If everything needs a cause, why not turn that logic around and ask what caused God?]
This logic would only aplly to the ones that need such logic, since we do not need such logic to understand god, we don't need to worry about that, but since you need that kinda logic to not believe in god, you are the target audience for such a debate, not us.
39 comments
^The Spirit of Nothingness hiccuped. From that hiccup sprouted God the Lord Almighty. The Lord said, "Hey thanks for sprouting me, now let me repay your kind gesture..." With this the Lord manifested a glass of water. The Spirit of Nothingness drank the water and was filled. But as being filled went against the very definition of being nothing, Nothingness melted away, leaving only matter. God was understandably upset by this accidental incident, but he rejoiced when the remains of his creator began to sprout what he later named "life." Since then, in honor of the memory of his long deceased creator and friend, he vowed to watch over the life sprouted from the remains of Nothingness with benevolence and love.
Oh shit.
Queensland, Australia was reknowned for being in the dark ages through the Sir Joh years. (Johannes Bjelke Petersen - Premier of QLD 1968-1987)
He was a borderline facist, head of a corrupt Government on the take from organised crime syndicates, and declared martial law against protestors, banned rock concerts as so forth.
Anyway, apart from all that, his favourite catchphrase to head off awkward, incriminating or embarrassing questions was, "Oh my goodness me, don't you worry about that!"
I can just see BigChrisFilm, or any other Creationist using that phrase.
[But what about Dinosaurs?]
"Oh my goodness me, don't you worry about that!"
[But what about radiometric dating?]
"Oh my goodness me, don't you worry about that!"
[But what about mitrochondrial DNA being used to map human migration?]
"Oh my goodness me, don't you worry about that!"
[How can a loving God allow such terrible things to happen?]
"Oh my goodness me, don't you worry about that!"
Actually, he is quite correct. The target audience for a logical debate is those who are intelligent enough to follow logic. The rest, including BigChrisFilm, should be politely ignored.
This sounds to me like none other than:
* Q. When he went, had you gone and had she, if she wanted to and were able, for the time being excluding all the restraints on her not to go, gone also, would he have brought you, meaning you and she, with him to the station?
* MR. BROOKS: Objection. That question should be taken out and shot.
-- The Stupidest Things Ever Said
Is there a "world's biggest pile of shit" award?
My Fundie translator keeps rejecting this but if I step it through on manual I get:
Logic?
If I use logic I will lose my delusion.
Nice, comfortable delusion, you are safe with me.
Therefore, logic is for other people.
Here it is folks:
THE FUNDY LORD'S PRAYER
Our fantasy, that art about Heaven,
Hallucenations of the same,
A kingdom to come.
My will be done,
On Earth or I shall scream persecution.
Guile us this day o' holy babble.
And forgive us our trespasses,
As we denounce those who trespass against us.
And lead us not into Education,
But deliver us from progress
For mine are the tantrums,
and the SHOUTING,
and the bigotry,
for dumber and dumberer. Amen.
mad dog #34661 - I think he was trying to do a rocket jump to get up to the secret ledge for his 'breastplate of righteousness'
Ephesians 6:14 (I shit you not - World English Bible)
Stand therefore, having the utility belt of truth buckled around your waist, and having put on the breastplate of righteousness.
@BigChrisfilm
Hey, It's all fun and games until the person being made fun of finds the site about them isn't it, what great load of crap you guys our.lol.
Then it's fucking hilarious!
I'm glad you find it so funny, but I don't think taking a bunch of quotes of mine out of context is going to have that much of an effect on me, only idiots are receptive to such things. My finger is point in your direction pal. :)
BigChrisFilm, if you are going to insult us, try to use proper spelling and grammar. I'll even help by correcting your posts:
#37368
Hey, It's all fun and games until the person being made fun of finds the site about them isn't it? What a great load of crap you guys are. Lots of laughs!
#37377
My finger is pointing in your direction, pal.
Maybe if you act quick, you can quickly fix your posts before more people see your sloppiness.
but I don't think taking a bunch of quotes of mine out of context is going to have that much of an effect on me
Is there a context we can take these in that doesn't make you look like a huge, fucking tool? Also, in case you hadn't noticed, there's a little link under every quoted post that leads to the original thread said post comes from. Any visitor is simply a click away from context!
<<< Hey, It's all fun and games until the person being made fun of finds the site about them isn't it >>>
No, then it's fucking hilarious, as Napoleon said. And it isn't out of context - the link back to the original is right there, and a cursory inspection shows that yes, you are just as batshit insane as the quote makes you look.
Well if you were all paying attention, mabey you would have realized that wasn't even me saying that, rather, I used a quote fomr a web site, lol, and by the way, that means Laugh Out Loud, not Lots of Laughs, second, I don't need a grammer leason, I am not writting a freakin essay, and I am not going to waste my time trying to be proper when most of you don't even use proper sentance structure to begin with.
Stick with your appallingly clumsy double negatives all the way through your sentence you fuckwit, otherwise you reverse your meaning!
I was pretty sure I put the link at the bottom of the page, but if I didn't it wasn't because I meant to do it.
...but if I didn't, it wasn't because I didn't mean -t- to do it.
Oh come on now guys, BigChrisFilm is a babe in Christ, he is doing pretty good if you ask me. Good answer he gave
You can use someone elses stuff if you agree with it, less typing for you.
<<< Good answer he gave >>>
Not really. In fact, not at all. It's called dodging the question and generally means you don't have a real answer.
<<< You can use someone elses stuff if you agree with it, less typing for you. >>>
Try that in your English class. You WILL fail, pretty much automatically. It's good practice to cite your sources.
@Crystal
You can use someone elses stuff if you agree with it, less typing for you.
Yeah, and Madame Marie Curie (nee Sklodowska) and myself have 2 nobel prizes between us for our collective work on radioactivity - one in Physics and one in Chemistry, although we had to share the Physics one with Henri Becquerel.
If everything needs a cause, why not turn that logic around and ask what caused God?
we do not need such logic to understand god
Why do you decide it is god that needs no explanation? How about you just stop at earth, if your going to make god an exception why not make earth the only thing that doesn't need a cause? So basiclly you are agreeing with the previous poster (If everything needs a cause, why not turn that logic around and ask what caused God?) but saying that god is an exception and needs no cause. If you think god is an exception why not just say earth is the exception and forget about god? Sorry that was quite repetitive but I need to repeat it for him to understand.
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.