David, cancer is preventable. For starters, stop smoking really bad weed.
5/16/2006 8:47:29 PM
Look here David, I'll say this nice and clear for you. Your supposed deity of choice is OMNIPOTENT. If he doesn't like abortion he should damned well do something miraculous such as having every attempt at it fail no matter the technique used.
As for us doing something useful like funding research, once again, your deity is OMNIPOTENT. Let him get off his lazy ass and do some fucking thing that's useful for once like curing all the diseases that HE CREATED in the first place.
5/16/2006 8:48:57 PM
can't wait to see what David D.G. is going to write, now that his name has been slandered by association
5/16/2006 9:01:45 PM
\"Instead of spending so much time and effort on murdering babies why don't you spend time funding cancer research and funding for the well being of those little warriors \" KIDS \" with cancer who's only wish is to get better for MOMMY AND DADDY so they won't be sad. Such selflessness inside the hearts of these little warriors.\"
Maybe I'm just too darn cynical, but I'd think the little kids would also like to not die for themselves, too.
5/16/2006 9:16:20 PM
Lets see, xtians whinning stopped stem-cell research,which could have helped cancer patients.
5/16/2006 9:18:05 PM
Yeah, because abortions are so much more expensive than the costs associated with pregnancy and raising children.......!?
5/16/2006 9:34:06 PM
Aids from gay. Beware.
5/16/2006 9:34:20 PM
I'm having that urge to put my head in the sand again...
5/16/2006 9:39:12 PM
Well, he gets a bit of credit for agreeing that condoms are part of the solution.
5/16/2006 9:44:08 PM
Well, I'll agree that \"BABIES NOT FETUSES [sic]\" have a right to life. No argument there. The problem comes in where people define it as a \"baby\" when it isn't yet -- which is what I suspect my namesake here is doing. (There are times I really hate having such a common name -- such as right now. Right, mad dog -- \"slandered by association,\" indeed!)
I have no problem with funding cancer research, or AIDS research for that matter; but it mystifies me that this guy expects NON-fundies to be the ones to write off AIDS as a gay disease! As they say in the cartoons: \"Whahappen?\" Fundies are usually the ones making that claim, not fighting it (or projecting it)! I'm at least glad to see that this guy admits that condoms are useful in preventing spread of the disease; however, it is spread by other means as well, not all of them entirely voluntary, so it certainly is no good to just say, \"It's your own fault if you catch it, so we're not going to try to cure it.\" AIDS sufferers, like those of any other disease (including cancer), deserve our best efforts to find a cure. Or are you also going to tell people with lung cancer that they don't deserve our help because they smoked, or tell people with skin cancer that they don't deserve our help because they spent too much time tanning? Don't moralistically prejudge the reasons for diseases. The primary concern is finding ways to prevent and cure them, ALL of them.
Finally, one small comment: \"Abortion funding\"? Does this guy think that there is some foundation for the performance of abortions, doing fund drives to sponsor more abortions, setting progressively higher-number goals each year? That's morbid, twisted, and absolutely WRONG. Nothing could be further from the truth of the situation, and it is a sick caricature to imply such a mischaracterization of it. Abortion is a case-by-case MEDICAL issue and should be treated as such, and nobody has any business condemning it as a procedure any more than of condemning chemotherapy across the board.
5/16/2006 10:12:01 PM
First, let me say that I agree with you that people should not murder babies and that fetuses are not babies. I'm glad we agree on that.
Second, I bet most kids with cancer have wishes other than to \"get better for MOMMY AND DADDY.\"
Third, not all AIDS is preventable. Rape victims can get AIDS. Hemohiliacs can get AIDS. Medical workers and other care-givers can get AIDS. And, condoms are great but they are no 100% protection from STDs.
Last, Not all cancer is unpreventable. We know that certain choices significantly raise one's risk of cancer, such as smoking, over-exposure to the sun or exposure to certain environmental toxins.
Wise up, Butthead. Not everything is black & white.
5/16/2006 10:14:44 PM
<We know that certain choices significantly raise one's risk of cancer, such as smoking, over-exposure to the sun or exposure to certain environmental toxins.>
Do those toxins include this shit spewing from Antidavid's mouth?
5/16/2006 10:30:28 PM
Yes, that can cause blindness and brain damage.
5/16/2006 10:38:27 PM
Yes, that can cause blindness and brain damage.
5/16/2006 10:38:36 PM
First, let me say that I agree with you that people should not murder babies and that fetuses are not babies.
The sensible people agree with both of you on the first, and with just you on the second. AntiDavid (Divad?) apparently thinks the word \"fetus\" was invented by the \"pro-abortion lobby\" of his fever dreams to convince themselves (or, rather, <i>our</i>selves, since he's talking about you and me here) that we're not in favor of murdering a pre-born baby.
5/16/2006 11:36:12 PM
For a political \"movement\" that prides itself on smaller government, laissez-faire economics and so on, it must really rot your ass to have voted for the biggest expander of government since the second world war! Jayzus, you must be pissed! I know I am, and I don't even live in your country!
5/16/2006 11:46:57 PM
Oh, you cruel pro-choicers, you don't care that poor angelic strawchildren will never grow up to be strawmen and strawwomen!
5/17/2006 12:40:23 AM
Napoleon the Clown
Please Sierra, stop with the Myspace cunts! They're destroying wht's left of my faith in humanity!
5/17/2006 1:08:34 AM
He's right with the fact that babies have more rights than zygotes.
He's also right that prevention is better than cure!
Sadly the fuckwit didn't mean to say either of them.
5/17/2006 1:17:42 AM
Maybe the churches should give up the millions and fudn cancer. Also, its the conservatives that think people with Aids deserve to die usually, we think everyone deserves to live. Wow, this guy is mixed up.
5/17/2006 1:23:45 AM
Napolean: you still have ANY faith in humanity after reading this site for more than a week?
5/17/2006 3:18:39 AM
Instead of spending so much time and effort on murdering babies why don't you spend time funding cancer research and funding for the well being of those little warriors
Abortions are paid by the individual and therefore bring money into the hospital. The hospital can use the extra money to cure people and maybe fund a few research projects on aids/cancer.
And there is some wisdom shining trough the rubble that is AntiDavi's post. Unfortunatly I doubt that it is all intended to be there.
5/17/2006 7:02:46 AM
Originally posted by Captain Slack
AntiDavid (Divad?) apparently thinks the word \"fetus\" was invented by the \"pro-abortion lobby\" of his fever dreams to convince themselves (or, rather, ourselves, since he's talking about you and me here) that we're not in favor of murdering a pre-born baby.
Everyone knows sex is a magical ritual which at its climax summons into being a fully-formed yet perfectly minuscule baby, gradually expanding until it is ready for entry into the world. Miscarriages, birth defects, etc. occur when the ritual is performed incorrectly.
5/17/2006 8:57:16 AM
Thanks David, for deciding who deserves to live or die, I feel much better now!
5/17/2006 12:56:42 PM
Justin's pet peeve: David is 25. That's way too old to be such a moron.
5/17/2006 1:58:01 PM