1
#45785
Redhunter
Hey professor, learn to spell. The only thing you have professed is that you are a pompous asshole with zero credibility. 'I'm not very smart' is the only smart thing you said. Yeah, you really exposed 'newtons's' law. Wow. what a genie-us.
6/23/2006 12:03:43 PM
#45960
Crosis
<<< whoops is a christian supposed to use science to prove things such as religion? >>>
You can try. Good luck.
<<< if the big bang \"theory\" is correct...then why is venus rotating on it's axis a different way then earth...???? Wierd wouldn't that break newtons's law for the big bang theory??? >>>
No, it wouldn't break any laws of physics. And you are either woefully ignorant, a complete moron, or (more likely) both if you think it would.
6/24/2006 2:15:49 AM
#45964
Julian
Bizarro world!
I wonder if that was Kent Hovind's original draft of his \"thesis\"?
6/24/2006 2:32:52 AM
#45986
CousinTed
Technicaly speaking, Newtonian phsyics are quite outdated. Why do fundies always try to argue against the oldest possible version of a scientific theory? Do they not realise that science changes to fit new information?
Darwin is not the be all and end all of evolution!
Newton is not the be all and end all of physics
I could most likely destroy this moron in a debate!
6/24/2006 3:34:47 AM
#45994
NotMe
In short:
I heard something called X, I also heard that X does Y but I'll also atribute property Y' to it. After that I heard about Z. I don't really understand X,Y,Y' or Z but I'm sure that Y' and Z are incompatible making Y wrong and X false.
I'm amazed that he still sticks to the earth after \"disproving\" gravity.
6/24/2006 3:53:25 AM
#46018
Julian
CousinTed, my Tracey Chapman CD could destroy this moron in a debate. This moron already destroyed himself above!
6/24/2006 4:31:06 AM
#234439
Salvador
This is so ignorant, I'll have to laugh.
A little?
Oh, man, no, I can't. This is so rich.
5/22/2007 7:00:04 PM
#381764
cyborgtroy
Break newton's laws? How? If you think you're so damn smart, clarify yourself.
"Whoops, did i just solve the case?"
No.
1/16/2008 5:00:30 AM
#935654
Cool story, bro
I lol'd.
4/7/2009 1:11:24 AM
#938778
Professer. You. Are. A. Dumbass. Clear enough?
4/13/2009 12:05:17 AM
#973189
Sisyphus
I think Stephen Hawking will want a word with Isaac Newton about taking credit for his theory.
6/18/2009 11:48:57 AM
#973221
Clown
Newtons's law and Big bang theory? Who was that Newtons you are talking about? A guy from Discworld books?
6/18/2009 1:26:24 PM
#985350
katie5000
"...if the big bang "theory" is correct...then why is venus rotating on it's axis a different way then earth..."
What the HELL does the BBT have to do with THAT??
"Weird wouldn't that break newton's law for the big bang theory???"
Newton had NOTHING TO DO with the BBT. At all. There is NO "Newton's Law for the Big Bang Theory". I have to say, that's the stupidest thing I've ever heard.
7/9/2009 9:48:37 PM
#1222398
shykid
Does this even make sense to anyone besides you?
My guess is no.
10/29/2010 11:17:29 PM
#1222399
shykid
Disregard this; I suck cocks.
10/29/2010 11:20:41 PM
#1222401
Swede
You don't need to prove anything about religion, really. As long as you keep it to yourself, that is.
When you try to push it onto others, and want laws to be written in accordance with the Word of God, then we want proof, evidence.
You are aware that there are other groups, beside "christian" and "atheist", aren't you? Oh, and please learn the plural of atheist.
The letter I, when used as a pronoun for yourself, should be capitalized.
If you think you're "not very smart when it comes to this stuff", then why the heck open your mouth and let us all know just how stupid you are?
I'll call you village idiot, m'kay?
10/29/2010 11:45:55 PM
#1222456
Anon-e-moose
"whoops"
Just that makes kleinpower sound very amusingly camp, so I'll just leave the rest of his BS as 'tl;dr'.
@shykid
"Disregard this; I suck cocks."
Certainly explains kleinpower's use of 'whoops'! X3
10/30/2010 8:56:03 AM
#1222532
rw23
> i'm not very smart when it comes to this stuff
We noticed.
10/30/2010 2:56:07 PM
#1222536
Angua
Yeah. Newton's Big Bang theory.
You know. The idea that space is expanding. The idea that was first proposed by astronomer and Catholic priest Georges Lemaître because he saw it as an implication of Einstein's theory of general relativity. You know, the same Theory of Relativity that actually provides a more accurate theory of gravity than Isaac Newton'd theory of gravity.
10/30/2010 3:08:07 PM
#1222544
radda
How cute he thinks he`s people ^^
10/30/2010 4:39:12 PM
#1222557
Pirate
what.
10/30/2010 7:06:46 PM
#1282721
The Duelist
...
.....
You've gotta be fuckin' kidding me.
4/26/2011 1:30:03 PM
#1282724
TWoozl
Go and sit in the corner, you babbling idiot. Adults are talking.
4/26/2011 1:32:54 PM
#1386597
Saringuy
'/whoops is a christian supposed to use science to prove things such as religion? Or is that reserved for atheist'/
nope. religion is unfalsifiable. therefore, it can't even be taken seriously as a scientific claim. if you would like to pass yours as a fact however, you'll have to prove it with science, just like any other hypothesis. you won't be an exception just because you have faith. this is the main reason religious ideas doesn't pass. besides from being absolute bullcrap anyway.
3/27/2012 2:31:53 PM
1