[ People like you are the reason I prefer the term "Straight supremacist" when talking in reference to anti-gay individuals. It doesn't downplay exactly what you are. ]

Homosexual activists took the term gay that meant happy for themselves. They took the symbol of the rainbow which was a sign of God’s covenant with the earth to make their plight look equivalent to that of the non-white races. So I won’t be surprised that you propaganda ridden activist would do something so hateful and stupid as attempt to demonize those who disagree with the homosexual act as unhealthy, as if they were racists. And muddy the language to make us sound like we are against homosexual individuals themselves rather than their lifestyle for their own sake with the phrase ‘anti-gay’. It’s quite to be expected. Homosexuality was never disproven to be a mental illness scientifically, it was activists that got it removed as such. So it’s no wonder that the unreasoning attacks against any criticism continue on that tack. Critical thinking has been abandoned when it comes to the whole left’s libertine views.
But consider it more thoroughly; your language is wrong and you are attacking people who hate-not with the implications inborn in your language that they do. This is deeply dishonest.
One ‘lifestyle’ is definitely more moral than the other. This basic reasonable judgement cannot be tossed out with the assumption that this means all straights are better than all homosexuals with your kurt little phrase ‘str8 supremacy’. That is dishonest unreasoning nonsense.
If you love the truth at all you will examine carefully such language and put it where it belongs, in the rubbish bin.