1 2 3
#48469
DrunkMonkey
Always have to leave the 2% to cover your ass.
7/2/2006 1:39:30 AM
#48474
Hadanelith
What is your intel? Who is it from? Why do you trust it? Hell, who is 'we'?
7/2/2006 1:44:38 AM
#48476
Talisman
Originally posted by Hadanelith
What is your intel? Who is it from? Why do you trust it? Hell, who is 'we'?
Why, they got the info from the Bible of course. And since it's \"God's Word\" obviously it's trustworthy. Good thing God put all this info into a code and hid it inside the Bible so those nasty terrorists couldn't get their hands on it ...
Lucky for us they're on the case, eh? Why, just look at all the people they've notified about this threat:
Originally posted by TrueBibleCode.com
Organisations and people warned about June 29th to July 4th so far...
All the 100 plus permanent missions to the UN (fax), including the Vatican permanent mission to the UN.
29 Congresspersons representing NY State (fax)
Senators Hillary Clinton and Charles Schumer (fax)
Mayor Bloomberg (fax)
FEMA (fax)
FBI (web tip submission)
New York City and State Fire Department (fax)
US National Fire Administration (fax)
Google News and other search engine news sites (www.prweb.com)
70,000 online reads and 2,500 media outlet pick ups of our latest press release through the PRweb newswire
Head Office of the Watchtower in Brooklyn Heights
Hundreds of churches and religious bodies in NYC (email and fax).
Interview on the Tommy and Rumble show on NWOR Virginia (everything that rocks!) www.fm99.com/Recap.asp
Interview on the Johnny and Kerry show on KQRC Kansas city.
Interview on the Lisa D and Dave Beagle Morning show on WJIM Lansing Michigan.
Massive Google Adword Campaign.
Don't we all feel so much more safe knowing there's people like this around?
7/2/2006 1:55:08 AM
#48496
Funkaloyd
This has gotta be satire.
At least they have the guts to set a date for their prophecy *coughrapturereadycough*
7/2/2006 2:39:37 AM
#48500
McCulloch
We are now 95% confident that the people making this claim will have completely forgotten it by July 11.
We are also 89% confident that they will make another stupid false prediction before the end of the summer.
7/2/2006 2:45:04 AM
#48504
McCulloch
Somebody has way too much time on their hands. It is hard to determine if it is an elaborate satire, just look at the size of the site and the complexity of the pseudo-analysis and the rediculous number of non-sequitors.
If it is a satire, who the hell has the time to put it together.
If it is not a satire, who the hell can be so friggin stupid!
7/2/2006 2:55:09 AM
#48508
Dante's Virgil
Looks like fundies who want to make predictions would've learned from the Jehovah's Witnesses about date setting. After all, \"false prophets\" will make predictions that won't come true. So sayeth the Holy Babble.
7/2/2006 3:06:37 AM
#48512
Jaded_Revenge
damn, still no nuclear attack...
when they fail does that make the bible code 98% wrong?
anyway, how do they come up with that percentage?
7/2/2006 3:12:02 AM
#48519
Amigone201
A nuclear bomb? A nuke wouldn't \"hit\" the UN plaza, it would level half of Manhattan.
7/2/2006 3:29:02 AM
#48530
JustinGG
I do predictions too. I predict that when the U.N. plaza doesn't go up in a mushroom cloud, these yahoos will tell us that it didn't happen because God decided to thward the terrorists, and spare all of those innocent people, and He should be praised.
No special powers. I've just seen this rationale before.
7/2/2006 3:45:52 AM
#48538
Papabear
If he's taking bets, I'd like some of that 49 to 1 action.
7/2/2006 3:56:40 AM
#48545
xMinionX
@ Talismans second quoted post
Google has now gone biblical. We all knew it would happen. ;)
7/2/2006 4:37:02 AM
#48546
xMinionX
Just so you all know, I don't know why it's doing this. Everytime I refresh the page it sends another post. Gonna stop now. :-P
7/2/2006 4:39:46 AM
#48547
Talisman
Originally posted by xMinionX
Just so you all know, I don't know why it's doing this. Everytime I refresh the page it sends another post. Gonna stop now. :-P
We all have our off days.;)
7/2/2006 4:41:10 AM
#48554
Crosis
I've had that happen occasionally, Minion (my net connection is really flaky here, so I'll occasionally stop and resubmit, only to find that the first few did get through). You should be able to delete them.
-----
These Bible Code freaks are hilarious. They put the \"anal\" (as in, source of information) in \"analysis\".
7/2/2006 5:15:19 AM
#48560
ND
Then why not do something to stop it asshole? Instead of sitting back and letting it happen then clucking and tsk tsking to yourselves about it. Better yet, why don't you go to the plaza and stand there that evening.
7/2/2006 5:50:15 AM
#48566
Napoleon the Clown
Nothing to say to this other than, \"Whatever...\"
7/2/2006 6:33:43 AM
#48576
NotMe
98% sure... Does this mean that they are sure that an atomic bomb will fall, that the UN Plaza will be under attack, or that terrorists will attack? Or does this mean that in those 2% nothing happens?
7/2/2006 8:09:25 AM
#48580
NonHomogenized
Obviously, this isn't actually going to happen. But, in the hypothetical situation that a nuke were to go off in that locale, wouldn't the more parsimonious (given a lack of any evidence as to whom the culprits were) be that the people responsible for the site were somehow affiliated with the people planting the bomb? I bet the FBI would think that was the simpler explanation, and investigate that possibility quite thoroughly.
7/2/2006 9:33:02 AM
#48583
Matt
YOU are the terrorists fucktards, die motherfuckers.
7/2/2006 9:57:10 AM
#48584
Julian
Any terrorists out there will be delighted to know their odds of success have gone up to 98%.
(oh wait, if 4 separate attacks occur, each with a 62.4% probability of success, there's only a 98% chance).
At least the fuckers haven't thought of bombing it themselves.
7/2/2006 10:18:20 AM
#48599
Rob
These guys were in my shop photocopying flyers to spread around the UN months ago, when the terrorist attack was supposed to occur in the beginning of June.
7/2/2006 11:58:26 AM
#48642
Mal Renyolds
I'm suprised no one brought this up before. On the page linked to for this \"prediction\", they admit they've gotten the date wrong three times.
7/2/2006 4:45:28 PM
#48669
James
Well, the administration, as well as fundies, all use fear-mongering and threats to dictate policies. Seeing as this is pretty much a definition of terrorism (which after all is a method, not a soverign state, and thus not something you can wage war on)...
That just means someone in the whitehouse is salivating over some codes he intends to use since it'll give a big 4th of july bang, backed by the corps, sociopaths, right-wingers and bush.
7/2/2006 7:09:33 PM
#48674
Talisman
Originally posted by Mal Renyolds
I'm suprised no one brought this up before. On the page linked to for this \"prediction\", they admit they've gotten the date wrong three times.
Good catch. I'll admit I didn't read the entire page so I didn't see that. That just makes it more hilarious.
7/2/2006 7:39:22 PM
1 2 3