nope. not to us. You just do not see him in your life because you don't believe. We see him in ours, because we know he is real and it's that's simple. We wish you could open your eyes and ears, but it isn't up to us, it's up to you.
10 comments
Well, Sharon who clearly wandered away from the nuthouse she was living in & stumbled into the nearest public library, it's difficult to be useless when you don't actually exist. You however, do exist & have proven yourself quite useless, just with this one little post. I suppose congratulations are in order.
Meh, I think we should leave Sharon alone. She's far and away the kindest, most pleasant, and most rational Christian on that site. She's fine with gay people, tries to understand trans people, and accepts the rulings of courts.
Yes, this quote is silly but hardly worth getting all heated up over.
I'm with Ambulance Chaser on this one. Sharon's a badly needed breath of fresh air on that channel. And regardless of who it is, that's pretty tame compared to some of the crap that people spout there, anyway.
I don't see this one as all that fundie, really. Religious, certainly, but it's basically just stating the premise of most faiths: if you let yourself, you'll see the truth.
Here's a photograph of something which doesn't physically exist, but can be seen :
image
Smartphones come with picture taking/video recording functions built in: they're the 'Killer App' - pun not intended - for these devices. Certainly in recent years for news broadcasters, law enforcers/security agencies; also news media networks & TV companies ('Hilarious Clip' shows etc) who will pay handsomely for scoop-making photos/videos.
iOS/Android-based smartphones are ubiquitous. Thus the demand for on-the-spot pictures which can help the police/FBI/CIA/NSA/MI6 et al, and make news announcements - with pictorial coverage - essentially instantaneous: of events both bad: and good.
I guess the 'Belie f' app hasn't been made yet. Nor the CCD for smartphones which can capture images from your comfy little fantasy dimension called the 'Spiritual', amirite?!
We'd like to know what colours the rainbows are there; must pale into insignificance compared with the sky in such a place: even more Fabulously hued.
But then of course, Proof denies 'Faith'. Otherwise you & all your ilk would have banged JREF's doors off their hinges demanding that your proof be subjected to the most stringent scientific testing imaginable: peer reviewed too, to claim his $1 million prize.
Belief is not required to see a thing that exists. I don't have to believe in apples to see them at the supermarket. If they exist (and they're there), I will be able to see them regardless of my disbelief. On the other hand, hallucinations are a common phenomenon and most readily identified by no one else seeing what the hallucinator sees.
@Shepard Solus ...^^^...
Exactly. Well said. I wonder what we would get if we would ask all of those people to describe god's voice, or the color of his hair or the size of his feet, or whether he had bushy eyebrows - without looking at other people's answers.
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.
