Ok, like King Arthur was a king in Brittian? He was a king towards the end of the Mideivl period? He had a wife named Gueinevere and a knight named Lancelot? None of that contradicts reason or common sense. But its all false. King Arthur was a minor king in Scandanivia (not Brittian) at the begining of the period (not the end). He did have a castle and a wizard (probablly a mere magician) and that's about as close to the Legend as it comes. What's my point? You cannot use your own discernment to gather the truth. You will be wrong. so how can you believe in parts of the Bible and not other parts?
Rom831, Rapture Ready 27 Comments
[11/1/2002 12:00:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 6