These four bills would require that in every classroom from kindergarten through high school perverse sexual activity be praised and highlighted in a positive light. They would require textbooks, many of which would then also be produced for other states beyond the borders of California, make positive references to the ideas of men putting on women's under things. They would restrict school districts from being able to bar females from displaying dildos on the outerwear of their prom dress. And in functional sexuality courses from K-12, they would require positive explanation of the merits and instruction of anal intercourse.
26 comments
"These four bills would require that in every classroom from kindergarten through high school perverse sexual activity be praised and highlighted in a positive light."
Who gets to decide what activities are perverse? You?
"They would require textbooks, many of which would then also be produced for other states beyond the borders of California, make positive references to the ideas of men putting on women's under things."
Positive, or neutral? There's a big difference. What underwear somebody wears is really no one else's business.
"They would restrict school districts from being able to bar females from displaying dildos on the outerwear of their prom dress."
Uh huh. You've noticed a huge upsurge in girls wanting to wear dildos on their prom dresses?
"And in functional sexuality courses from K-12, they would require positive explanation of the merits and instruction of anal intercourse."
I'd bet dollars to dustballs they are not advocating teaching anal sex techniques in kindergarten.
Since anal sex is part of human sexuality, I don't see what is wrong in teaching about it. Calm down, Kev, sex is part of human existence. Every kid, including kids of parents that are wound too tightly, deserve to know the facts about human sexuality.
Sigh - memories of the purely "mechanical" sex-ed that I got back at school - I don't think any mention was made of such unessentials as foreplay, female orgasm, or the experience actually being enjoyable in any way. Penis goes in vagina, with a condom if you don't want a kid - anything before or after that event you can figure out for yourself. What a rich curriculum.
"People must not do things for fun. We are not here for fun. There is no reference to fun in any Act of Parliament." - A.P. Herbert
Tell me, have there ever actually been instances when a school has had cause to ban the wearing of dildos on prom dresses? Somewhat specific, isn't it?
Wow, I don't think I've seen so much Crisco on such a large inclined plane.
Now I wish I'd gone to Prom my senior year.
And can I state for the record that I really, really hate it when people say "female" when they mean "girl" or "woman"?
“Thou hast also taken thy fair jewels of my gold and of my silver, which I had given thee, and madest to thyself images of men, and didst commit whoredom with them” (Ezekiel 16:17).
Best ban the Babble too, then.
More drivel from the WingNutDaily.
Just another example of fundie thinking along the lines of "It's bad cause I said so, therefore you shouldn't do it," which doesn't work because of the old addage, "Forbidden fruit is the sweetest."
And can I state for the record that I really, really hate it when people say "female" when they mean "girl" or "woman"?
So, so with you on that, Chan .
They would require textbooks, many of which would then also be produced for other states beyond the borders of California, make positive references to the ideas of men putting on women's under things.
"Under things"!? Repressed much? Newsflash, bub, "underwear" is a perfectly polite word. By replacing it, you just made people think more about these "naughty" garments, and you made yourself sound childish.
They would restrict school districts from being able to bar females from displaying dildos on the outerwear of their prom dress.
Because there are tons of sexual terrorists wearing cartridge belts full of sex toys...
And in functional sexuality courses from K-12, they would require positive explanation of the merits and instruction of anal intercourse.
I kinda doubt they'd start teaching the Kama Sutra in Kindergarten. And teens being teens, many of them will have sex before 18, in various ways/positions, so better that they know how to do it correctly and safely.
"These four bills would require that in every classroom from kindergarten through high school perverse sexual activity be praised and highlighted in a positive light"
I would have to see that before I believed it.
"They would require textbooks, many of which would then also be produced for other states beyond the borders of California, make positive references to the ideas of men putting on women's under things. They would restrict school districts from being able to bar females from displaying dildos on the outerwear of their prom dress. And in functional sexuality courses from K-12, they would require positive explanation of the merits and instruction of anal intercourse."
Ahh, I get it. Prank article.
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.