Home Archives Random Quotes Latest Comments Top 100 Submit Quote Search Log In

Quote# 14274

These four bills would require that in every classroom from kindergarten through high school perverse sexual activity be praised and highlighted in a positive light. They would require textbooks, many of which would then also be produced for other states beyond the borders of California, make positive references to the ideas of men putting on women's under things. They would restrict school districts from being able to bar females from displaying dildos on the outerwear of their prom dress. And in functional sexuality courses from K-12, they would require positive explanation of the merits and instruction of anal intercourse.

Kevin McCullough, WorldNetDaily 25 Comments [8/26/2006 12:00:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 4
Submitted By: NotMe
WTF?! || meh
Username:
Comment:



1
Geek

What?


Really, I doubt it all means what you think it does.

8/27/2006 2:29:48 PM

Papabear

\"These four bills would require that in every classroom from kindergarten through high school perverse sexual activity be praised and highlighted in a positive light.\"

Who gets to decide what activities are perverse? You?


\"They would require textbooks, many of which would then also be produced for other states beyond the borders of California, make positive references to the ideas of men putting on women's under things.\"

Positive, or neutral? There's a big difference. What underwear somebody wears is really no one else's business.


\"They would restrict school districts from being able to bar females from displaying dildos on the outerwear of their prom dress.\"

Uh huh. You've noticed a huge upsurge in girls wanting to wear dildos on their prom dresses?


\"And in functional sexuality courses from K-12, they would require positive explanation of the merits and instruction of anal intercourse.\"

I'd bet dollars to dustballs they are not advocating teaching anal sex techniques in kindergarten.

Since anal sex is part of human sexuality, I don't see what is wrong in teaching about it. Calm down, Kev, sex is part of human existence. Every kid, including kids of parents that are wound too tightly, deserve to know the facts about human sexuality.



8/27/2006 2:31:23 PM

Rockstar

What the hell kind of porm is that?

8/27/2006 3:47:14 PM

Amigone201

I have a blog on this stuff. This one really got me steamed.

8/27/2006 4:06:46 PM

ProperJob

Yes. Heaven forbid the kids are actually taught something.

8/27/2006 4:31:53 PM

Mister Spak

What do these 4 bills really say?

8/27/2006 4:31:59 PM

Brain_In_A_Jar

Sigh - memories of the purely \"mechanical\" sex-ed that I got back at school - I don't think any mention was made of such unessentials as foreplay, female orgasm, or the experience actually being enjoyable in any way. Penis goes in vagina, with a condom if you don't want a kid - anything before or after that event you can figure out for yourself. What a rich curriculum.

\"People must not do things for fun. We are not here for fun. There is no reference to fun in any Act of Parliament.\" - A.P. Herbert

Tell me, have there ever actually been instances when a school has had cause to ban the wearing of dildos on prom dresses? Somewhat specific, isn't it?

8/27/2006 4:37:31 PM

Crosis

Someone put his tinfoil hat on a little too tight.

8/27/2006 4:40:26 PM

David D.G.

I'm guessing this poster would describe a roadside drainage ditch as the Grand Canyon. Is there an award for hyperbole? A Baron Munchausen Award, perhaps?


~David D.G.

8/27/2006 4:52:49 PM

Chan

Wow, I don't think I've seen so much Crisco on such a large inclined plane.

Now I wish I'd gone to Prom my senior year.

And can I state for the record that I really, really hate it when people say \"female\" when they mean \"girl\" or \"woman\"?

8/27/2006 5:36:20 PM

CousinTed

>>They would restrict school districts from being able to bar females from displaying dildos on the outerwear of their prom dress.<<

Is this some sort of major problem? I mean honestly who would strap a dilo onto a fancy dress?

8/27/2006 6:13:59 PM

solomongrundy

“Thou hast also taken thy fair jewels of my gold and of my silver, which I had given thee, and madest to thyself images of men, and didst commit whoredom with them” (Ezekiel 16:17).
Best ban the Babble too, then.

8/27/2006 6:21:29 PM

Napoleon the Clown

*RAWR SNORT GROWL GROWL!*

8/27/2006 6:41:42 PM

ABeastOfPrey

More drivel from the WingNutDaily.

Just another example of fundie thinking along the lines of \"It's bad cause I said so, therefore you shouldn't do it,\" which doesn't work because of the old addage, \"Forbidden fruit is the sweetest.\"

8/27/2006 7:32:02 PM

Libkitten

SHUT. UP.

Teaching the mechanics of sex and birth control IS NOT THE SAME as encouraging it, jerk.

8/28/2006 12:40:40 AM

Redhunter

Are these four bill imaginary? Because the bible has a lot of 'fours' that don't really exist.

The four headwaters.
The four corners of the earth.
The four rivers of eden.
Four-Hundred years in the desert.
Four beasts of DAniel.
Feeding four-hundred people with a few loaves and some fish.
Four living beings full of eyes.
The four horsemen of the apocalypse.

Smells like four kinds of shit to me.

8/28/2006 6:56:14 AM

Julian

Are you sure about that Kevin? Would you like to put your pants back on and type with both hands please.

8/28/2006 8:08:39 AM

shell

And can I state for the record that I really, really hate it when people say \"female\" when they mean \"girl\" or \"woman\"?


So, so with you on that, Chan.

8/28/2006 8:39:04 PM

Adrian

They would require textbooks, many of which would then also be produced for other states beyond the borders of California, make positive references to the ideas of men putting on women's under things.

\"Under things\"!? Repressed much? Newsflash, bub, \"underwear\" is a perfectly polite word. By replacing it, you just made people think more about these \"naughty\" garments, and you made yourself sound childish.

They would restrict school districts from being able to bar females from displaying dildos on the outerwear of their prom dress.

Because there are tons of sexual terrorists wearing cartridge belts full of sex toys...

And in functional sexuality courses from K-12, they would require positive explanation of the merits and instruction of anal intercourse.

I kinda doubt they'd start teaching the Kama Sutra in Kindergarten. And teens being teens, many of them will have sex before 18, in various ways/positions, so better that they know how to do it correctly and safely.

8/28/2006 9:30:35 PM

Brain_In_A_Jar

\"Because there are tons of sexual terrorists wearing cartridge belts full of sex toys...\"

Adrian, I think that mental image will remain with me for life.

8/28/2006 10:25:57 PM

bobo

Where did you say they were having this prom???? Can I come and...observe the perversity?

8/28/2006 10:44:17 PM

John

These four bills would require that in every classroom from kindergarten through high school perverse sexual activity be praised and highlighted in a positive light.

For a fundie, that would be sex with the lights on ...

8/31/2006 8:31:37 PM

Old Viking

California is always ahead of the curve.

9/3/2006 1:08:58 AM

clockworkgirl21

"These four bills would require that in every classroom from kindergarten through high school perverse sexual activity be praised and highlighted in a positive light"

I would have to see that before I believed it.

"They would require textbooks, many of which would then also be produced for other states beyond the borders of California, make positive references to the ideas of men putting on women's under things. They would restrict school districts from being able to bar females from displaying dildos on the outerwear of their prom dress. And in functional sexuality courses from K-12, they would require positive explanation of the merits and instruction of anal intercourse."

Ahh, I get it. Prank article.

4/10/2008 7:09:12 PM

Yog-Sothoth

Bull-shit.

6/2/2008 3:58:56 PM
1