Crosis

Except that \"science\" has done no such thing (indeed, most common examples of an \"irreducibly complex\" object are not at all irreducibly complex).

Besides, if you think 6^50,000 is big, you haven't seen me do my thing when it comes to probability. *insert evil grin here*

7/20/2005 4:10:29 AM

Admiral Bob

\"Science has proven that a single cell is irreversible complex, being that it is impossible to have evolved. Both Christian and Non-Christian scientists now agree on this fact.\"

I would LOVE to see some proof of that

10/6/2006 3:11:53 AM

David D.G.

Curtis, anyone who told you this was LYING through their teeth. Not only is Intelligent Design a thoroughly debunked theory that doesn't even qualify as science, but no sensible and intellectually honest person (Christian, non-Christian, whatever) with any scientific knowledge at all believes it, or even ever did, because its very foundation is nonscientific!

Those few who cling to it either are completely deluded (such as some of the original perpetrators of it who still claim validity for it), or were simply tricked by the liars who still try to promote it as if it were scientific (easily done to those who have no real understanding of science), or have a major agenda that depends on believing it (such as the Christian originators of the theory). It is an intellectually bankrupt theory, Curtis, no more \"scientific\" than phrenology.


~David D.G.

10/6/2006 3:39:31 AM

You've been lied to.

6/22/2008 7:49:54 PM

That_Guy

Both Christian and Non-Christian scientists now agree on this fact

If by *scientists* you mean *this guy I read about on the internet*

1/13/2009 5:45:59 PM

rw23

We need a suitably dismissive shorthand term for any argument which resorts to a bizarre probability reference for support. Something like 'Poisson's Law', perhaps, or 'Argumentum ad Binomial Bollocks'. Suggestions?

1/13/2009 7:35:09 PM