Actually, Darwin was a schizophrenic and evolutionists have kept that bit under their hat for years...
[7/20/2005 12:00:00 ]
Fundie Index: 5
1) You wouldn't happen to have any evidence to back that up, would you?
2) Even if you did, the validity of a scientific theory does not depend on the mental state of its originator or any of its backers.
Einstein was autistic.
He wasn't a physicist, he was a patent clerk.
Roll that up in your KJV and smoke it.
7/22/2005 5:49:09 PM
By the way, Crosis, you know that comment wasn't pointed at you, right?
Yeah, I knew that.
And Hitler was a Christian.
No argument ad hominems, please.
5/10/2008 12:36:48 PM
Fundie definition of schizophrenic - Somebody who doesn't hear strange voices in their head commanding them to do things.
5/10/2008 3:31:32 PM
Little Nipper? Thats called libel. It's illegal. Further, it's called "bearing false witness." I remember ten big points being made...that was one of them.
5/10/2008 4:24:53 PM
and both of him were smarter than you
5/11/2008 4:06:08 PM
What is it with christians and pulling stuff out of their asses?
Got anything to back that lie up?
:: crickets ::
Uh-huh. Thought so.
You know, making shit up for Jesus is still lying.
Hitler was raised Christian.
6/17/2008 5:50:01 PM
Allegory for Jesus
Who the fuck cares if Darwin was a quasi-sentient betentacled sea sponge from beyond the moon? The idea of evolution and the evidence supporting it remain science independent of the history, opinions, and attitudes of any given scientist involved in molding the theory and providing the evidence.
10/14/2010 6:00:57 PM
If ad hominem arguments like that were at all valid, then you'd have to abandon your computer thanks to Turning's problems.
So your message is its own negation.
See what I did there?
10/14/2010 9:04:20 PM
This does nothing to invalidate the theory of evolution.
However, if anyone could provide knows this to be true, if they could provide a link or citation or something that would be great. I know that Darwin suffered from some illness of some sort that he may or may not have gotten in the tropics while on board
-- if it was schizophrenia, then it's certainly not what a good deal of people think of when they think of schizophrenia.
(Or maybe I'm the clueless one here. If someone hear knows something I don't or I'm being really obtuse, could you point it out?)
Yeah . . . I'm too lazy to do an real research on my own right now because it is completely irrelevant to his theory of evolution by means of natural selection.
10/14/2010 10:03:23 PM
It doesn't really matter, either way. Evolution has come a long way since Darwin worked on it. If he had made a mess of things, it would have been found and corrected with the scientific method.
Care to prove your unsubstantiated slander? No? Then GTFO. And stop lying for Jesus.
Darwin's illnesses have been put down to everything from arsenic poisoning to food intolerance, and of course to hypochondria (which even many of his family thought was the most likely explanation).
But schizophrenia? That's a new one!
"Actually, Darwin was a schizophrenic and evolutionists have kept that bit under their hat for years..."
Joan of Arc claimed she heard the voice of God. Remember what happened to her.
Nowadays, what she experienced would be diagnosed to as Schizophrenia.
With all the bullshit fundies claim, it's one big case of . They're also the reason why Pfizer's shares have gone up dramatically - and not because of sales of Viagra.
Pfizer (of the UK) also make Preparation H...!