Quote# 2077

I do not take the bible literaly,I check it out with a strongs concordance and several other versions of the bible

Deanar15, About.com Agnosticism/Atheism Board 11 Comments [1/1/2003 12:00:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 5
Username:
Comment:



1 | bottom

SaneChick

The bible is your weed, stop smoking it for a week and then see what you think of your religion.

11/25/2006 7:00:38 AM

HairlessMonkeyDK

You know, bullshit doesn't taste better, even if you garnish it with MORE bullshit.

11/25/2006 7:44:36 AM

Julian

literally.
Strong's - it's a person you idiot.

Is one of the other versions you use \"Young's Literal Translation\"?


11/25/2006 2:09:31 PM



I'm sure there was some kind of hilarious context to this but this person is just saying they use an open interpretation of the bible including several different versions and a concordance. Really not crazy at all, and this isn't "fundies misspell the darndest things"

9/16/2007 10:38:12 PM

Puck

Is the word 'freedom' listed in that concordance?

9/16/2007 11:28:42 PM

King Duncan

Comparing several different versions of the same outdated tripe is not helping your case.

9/17/2007 12:49:50 AM

Jack Bauer

.....and this person grew up to become George W Bush.

9/17/2007 6:52:12 AM

Sigmund Freud

Maybe you should take it anally.

9/23/2007 3:34:09 PM

Anti - Dei

@#307243:

I'm sure there was some kind of hilarious context to this but this person is just saying they use an open interpretation of the bible including several different versions and a concordance. Really not crazy at all, and this isn't "fundies misspell the darndest things"


Cross-checking facts by reading other versions of the same book does not seem the tiniest bit weird to you?

8/16/2008 12:25:27 AM

Sentry Gun

I'm almost sure cross referencing doesn't mean what you think it means.

5/29/2012 8:06:32 AM



Aside from the orthography, I can’t see the problems in this. People can read or research holy texts and still be irreligious.

7/21/2014 11:21:33 PM

1 | top: comments page