Home
Archives
Random Quotes
Latest Comments
Top 100
Submit Quote
Search
Log In
Forums
Quote# 2077
I do not take the bible literaly,I check it out with a strongs concordance and several other versions of the bible
Deanar15,
About.com Agnosticism/Atheism Board
10 Comments
[1/1/2003 12:00:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 4
WTF?!
||
meh
Username:
Comment:
Check here
1
#110244
SaneChick
The bible is your weed, stop smoking it for a week and then see what you think of your religion.
11/25/2006 7:00:38 AM
#110246
HairlessMonkeyDK
You know, bullshit doesn't taste better, even if you garnish it with MORE bullshit.
11/25/2006 7:44:36 AM
#110268
Julian
literally.
Strong's - it's a person you idiot.
Is one of the other versions you use \"Young's Literal Translation\"?
11/25/2006 2:09:31 PM
#288438
I'm sure there was some kind of hilarious context to this but this person is just saying they use an open interpretation of the bible including several different versions and a concordance. Really not crazy at all, and this isn't "fundies misspell the darndest things"
9/16/2007 10:38:12 PM
#288455
Puck
Is the word 'freedom' listed in that concordance?
9/16/2007 11:28:42 PM
#288521
King Duncan
Comparing several different versions of the same outdated tripe is not helping your case.
9/17/2007 12:49:50 AM
#288701
Jack Bauer
.....and this person grew up to become George W Bush.
9/17/2007 6:52:12 AM
#293201
Sigmund Freud
Maybe you should take it anally.
9/23/2007 3:34:09 PM
#635266
Anti - Dei
Originally posted by #307243
I'm sure there was some kind of hilarious context to this but this person is just saying they use an open interpretation of the bible including several different versions and a concordance. Really not crazy at all, and this isn't "fundies misspell the darndest things"
Cross-checking facts by reading other versions of the same book does not seem the tiniest bit weird to you?
8/16/2008 12:25:27 AM
#1407900
Sentry Gun
I'm almost sure cross referencing doesn't mean what you think it means.
5/29/2012 8:06:32 AM
1