Home Archives Random Quotes Latest Comments Top 100 Submit Quote Search Log In

Quote# 2135

[On a successfully fulfilled prediction]Isn't that handy. Science has a theory, perhaps based on archology, and now they have DNA and they claim the DNA record proves their already existing theorys. The new evidence should have compleatly overturned their existing theory. They should be having to scramble to come up with a new theory to explain the new information.

JohnR7, Christian Forums 8 Comments [1/1/2003 12:00:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 3
WTF?! || meh
Username:
Comment:



1
Julian

HaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHa! Oh John. Hope springs eternal right? How many thousands of times have you gone double or nothing and come up craps?

7/10/2006 7:10:46 AM

Crosis

<<< The new evidence should have compleatly overturned their existing theory. They should be having to scramble to come up with a new theory to explain the new information. >>>

Only if the earlier theory was incomplete or incorrect (and even then it's possible, and indeed likely if the earlier theory has gained enough traction to be considered a theory, that a random bit of evidence will fit with the theory).

7/11/2006 3:28:37 AM

Napoleon the Clown

Please repeat HS level science and pay attention when they get to the scientific method.

7/11/2006 4:28:43 AM

The Duelist

"archology"? Never heard of it.

8/9/2010 3:25:49 PM

Justanotheratheist

So when a theory is proven to be right we must assume it's wrong because proof of something is proof that the something is wrong? Is that what this idiot said?


8/10/2010 3:36:10 AM



Oh boohoo, the new evidence should have completely overturned their existing theory. But it doesn't. They should be having to scramble to come up with a new theory to explain the new information for my own beliefs to be valid. Oh woe is me, I want to play, but you just keep winning, that's not fair. Boohoo!

John..., JOHN! Snap out of it dammit! No one likes a crybaby.

8/10/2010 3:48:27 AM

Anon-e-moose

Butthurt that more and more gaps are being filled, thus your so-called 'God' who used to be at the centre of the platform that is Human Relevance, and is currently hanging on by his last few fingernails, waiting for the final few gaps to be filled (lol, LHC)? Thus your nonexistent invisible sky pixie will then finally fall into the Abyss of Human Irrelevance, to join all the other mythical deities of yore.

That day, in which we Atheists will finally be proved to be superior will be an exquisitely sweet one indeed.

[/smug & gloating]

"They should be having to scramble to come up with a new theory to explain the new information."

That's how it works, y'see:



Refining theories, based on new evidence. It's how you have a computer to spew your fundie bullshit. Certainly how they become more & more powerful, almost by the year, if not sooner.

8/10/2010 8:35:01 AM

Quantum Mechanic

What the fuck is "archology" anyway?

8/20/2011 3:42:25 AM
1