[Replying to 'a loving god wouldn't condemn its children to eternal torture'] That's not grasping the full picture and not understand what pure love is.
11 comments
Hmmm, dance track from 15 years ago by Crystal Waters
Back to the middle and around again. 100% - pure love!
Nope I'm not seeing it either, apart from the circular logic. I want to believe God is nice, therefore God is nice. The evidence shows otherwise. Obviously I need to redefine nice.
Duuuuuuuuuuuuuuuhhhhhh..........
Is it perpetually torturing everyone who doesn't believe in you?
For that, you have to wear the Dunce cap.
Ah, the old, “The word means something totally different when applied to God than when applied to anything else” argument. Good ol’ Humpty Dumpty fallacy.
Hey, you want the biblical definition of Love?
Love is patient, love is kind. It does not envy, it does not boast, it is not proud. It is not rude, it is not self-seeking, it is not easily angered, it keeps no record of wrongs. Love does not delight in evil but rejoices with the truth. It always protects, always trusts, always hopes, always perseveres.
1 Corinthians 13:47, NIV
Don’t see nothin’ about eternal torture. Indeed, “not easily angered,” “no record of wrongs,” “does not delight in evil,” and “always protects,” all pretty well speak against the whole eternal torture thing.
If you love something, set it free.
If it comes back to you, it is yours.
If it doesn't, it was never yours.
But if you still love it,
I mean really, REALLY love it,
send it to hell and torture it, FOREVER!!!
mBWAaahahahaha.
And don't forget; call the other side evil.
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.