1
#374857
King of Ferrets (formerly Corey)
So, we can try to prove to you that science works, but you'll reject anything done by scientists and any peer reviewed papers? Do we have to prove science with the Bible now? On a separate note... if we peer reviewed the Bible would he reject it?
1/3/2008 11:25:42 PM
#374883
David D.G.
First: No, our argument isn't flawed -- it's just that your participation in the discussion is fatally flawed. You don't have a superior argument -- you just refuse to allow yourself to engage in a meaningful discussion at all.
Second: You actually have the temerity to state that you reject science in a post on the Internet? Hypocrisy, thy name is fundie.
~David D.G.
1/3/2008 11:50:38 PM
#374888
(H9)
Why is this dumbfuck even using the Internet? Another one of those "Science/Technology-sucks-unless-it's-the-Internet" Award candidates I guess. :P
1/3/2008 11:55:19 PM
#374894
anti-nonsense
In other words "La la la, I can't heeeeearrrr you".
1/4/2008 12:07:51 AM
#374906
Bryan65
I reject it because I do! So there! Nyah!
inverter
1/4/2008 12:37:41 AM
#374917
Quantum Mechanic
Post that without transistors.
Go ahead.
Idiot.
1/4/2008 12:51:24 AM
#605825
Shadoboy
People that claim they reject science should be living in caves...
7/30/2008 5:58:44 AM
#606998
Darwin
I think we've discovered a new definition for the word 'stupid'.
7/31/2008 12:27:34 AM
#1067151
mkincub
doh. now you have to throw out your computer, which was thought of and created by scientists who used peer review in their theories.
12/6/2009 9:21:10 PM
#1190057
The Duelist
The word "inverter" now sits beside the word "stupid" in the dictionary.
8/9/2010 1:17:08 PM
#1430529
Apatheist
And yet here you are, typing on a computer, annoying much more rational people.
8/2/2012 6:54:54 PM
1