"Let me be clear, here: I am not saying that Christian men should rebel against authority when, contrary to God’s Creation order, it is exercised by woman.
This would have been fine if Tim had only left out "contrary to God's Creation order."
If a female police officer pulls me over and tickets me, I’ll respect and submit to her, not because she has a gun and a radio, but because she has been placed over me by God, bearing the sword in His behalf.
Even though it's "contrary to God's Creation order?" What?
Still, I will recognize that her authority is contrary to God’s creation order in the matter of sexuality, and it will grieve me causing me, like Lot, to gnash my teeth. And this is how every biblical Christian should view the exercise of authority by woman over man no matter where it occurs.
What exactly is a biblical Christian? So you're saying that instead of looking at women in places of authority as a normal occurence, men should reluctantly deal with it, but resent it all the same? That'll create a heck of a hostile work environment.
As the Holy Spirit said, woman is not to teach or exercise authority over man because Adam was created first, and then Eve."
Look, buddy, that's not the Holy Spirit talking, that's you. And by your logic, older siblings are superior to younger siblings because they were born first. Yet how is it that the younger son almost always is favored by God in the Bible, such as Jacob, Isaac, Joseph, etc.? You have filled your post with contradictions and you don't even realize it. Then again, of course, the Bible is full of contradictions; it's probably rubbed off on you.
@ Beccs: Yeah, I'd want to see that scene too.
