Home Archives Random Quotes Latest Comments Top 100 Submit Quote Search Log In

Quote# 2364

Why? Because there has not yet been enough evidence for macroevolution presented. There has been sufficient evidence for the resurrection.

spl_cadet, Theology Web 11 Comments [3/1/2003 12:00:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 9
WTF?! || meh
Username:
Comment:



1
tehcrzy

O RLY?

4/13/2008 11:48:16 AM

Katsuro

It must be opposites day again!

4/13/2008 11:57:42 AM

Canadiest

sufficient does not mean: none

Enough does not mean: all

4/13/2008 3:34:38 PM

Riddles

Enough evidence = I'M IN YOUR FACE YOU CAN'T IGNORE ME!!!

Sufficient evidence = Bibles said it and thats good enough for me

Sadly, my example is true for people like him

4/17/2008 11:28:31 AM

Trask

[Citation needed]

8/29/2009 10:11:17 PM



Should be easy to cite it, then.

So cite it, bitch.

1/6/2011 8:32:28 PM

Quantum Mechanic

Can't resurrect what never existed.

5/17/2012 12:23:21 PM

fishtank

indeeeeeed.

1/9/2013 11:51:43 AM



It is spelled erection.

1/10/2013 5:01:45 AM

louislois

"There has been sufficient evidence for the resurrection.

Where?

And your fucking Bible doesn't count as scientific proof.

1/10/2013 5:04:39 AM

Justanotheratheist

So much evidence for the resurrection, yet we've managed to miss all of it. That is quite some feat.

1/10/2013 5:07:31 AM
1