I have read it, and you think King James didn't write the Bible, do you think that was just a convient name? LOL
14 comments
The predescessor to King James commissioned the KJV - it only had that name because it came out during his time.
Massive amounts of material was edited from the KJV (including half of Jesus's sermons) in order to avoid offending the king.
And in the end, he refused to pay the translators.
Is that a man whose name you want attached to your holy book?
You.
Total.
Total.
Donkey.
Fucking.
Twat.
As far as I know there was no convent named King James (haha). He was the ruler of the time, stupid. He probably said he wanted a new translation, but I doubt very much that he had anything else to do with it. Oh well, he might have issued the money for it too.
The very poor quality of it might be explained, however, if he really did make it himself. He probably wasn't a schollar in Hebrew, Greek and Latin.
King James VERSION, you dumb deluded loser.
It's an edited version of preceding Bibles. Do your preachers have no idea or are they habitual liars? If you give a shit about your Bible, then fuckin' start undertanding it AND the others.
Consider this:
-Sony was not founded by someone named Sony
-Catgut is not made from cats
-General Mills was not founded by a military man who had a craving for cereal
-The film The Room does not explain its title at all
-The name of Flash animation and movie website Newgrounds has nothing to do with fresh dirt
-Scientology is not science or an -ology, but instead is a scam
Likewise, King James didn't write the Bible, all he did was order a new translation into English. Names can be deceiving
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.