As much as I absolutely despise disruptor and hope that he dies in a bath of salt after being flayed, he's right on the scientific evidence for HIV=AIDS, namely, that there is none.The evidence that exists is anecedotal and wouldn't pass muster in a class of kindergardeners.

Ah to wittynamehere, pictures are worth jack shit.They can be ANYTHING, no reputable virologist worth their salt depends on "mediafashioned" pictures.Those "Virus particles" could literally be anything from protein clumps to waste particles to viruses of another type to cellular debris etc.

The ONLY photography allowed to diagnose retroviruses is through electron micrography.Here, the standards set up by virologists world-wide consistently fail to turn up evidence of HIV in the standard gradient, which brings any other electron photo of supposed "HIV" particles into question.

a good interview....

http://www.theperthgroup.com/INTERVIEWS/cjepe.html

I may be branded as a conspiracy theorist, but when I looked at all the statistics,facts and studies over the past 25+ years, and the MONEY, my god the money; I have to wonder, just what the fuck is up?!?

I'll tell you something, after all I've seen and heard, if I, a healthy gay man who largely abstains from recreational drugs, eats right and gets it on, but uses condoms; gets diagnosed with HIV by my doctor or health clinic, my reaction will be
"So what?".What other reaction can I have for HIV tests, which all have _statutory_disclaimers on their packaging.

http://campaignfortruth.com/latestnews/WDIrapidtest.htm

Should I be "Diagnosed" I will not take any AIDS drugs, I will of course, have to radically alter my life, since I will have to tell every man I potentially go out with that I've been diagnosed HIV+(OOOH nice, yeah, Ima _really_ pick up guys that way)almost all HIV+ guys I know are AIDS and especially recreational drug users, and I'm not into that scene, I wanna live, and I've always hated poppers(for chrissakes, when your ass hurts,
it means you and your partner need to
take it easy!).

Oh, BTW, it doesn't matter if I retest anonomyously, and am found HIV- or indeterminate(usually regarded as HIV-) my original testing will stand, and depending on where I live, I may have to register for unwanted social services and possibly even be regarded as a criminal if I have unprotected sex with another man without revealing that I have been diagnosed HIV+ at some point.

I'm sorry for ranting, but this is how I see things.