Lots of gods are not creators. 99% or 100% of the Norse gods aren't. Same with the gdos of most polytheistic religions.
And yes, the movie is pretty terrible. I'm currently at #1, where he's demonstrated that God is more likely to exist because
1. He's allegedly created something.
2. He claims He's the creator.
Oh, wow. So if Thor claimed to have invented created the Viking longboat, that would make him more likely to exist? Nope.
OK, fallacy 2: Incorrect as there's not the slightest bit of evidence the universe had a beginning. There is, however, lots of evidence things can't be created (you can only turn something that exists into something else that also exists).
Fallacy 3: First of all, the argument really is stupid, as God is not in very loving at all, as depicted in the Old Testament. Second of all, there'd be plenty of tragedies in the world even without humans, in the case of natural disasters, disease, droughts, floods, etc. If God was a loving creature, he'd not allow these things to happen. It really is that simple.
'Isn't it ironic how good is tied to human nature, not to God at all'? No. First of all, I don't see the irony. Second, human incentives for doing good have been accounted for. We don't need a God to explain the incentives firefighters have to save people. And yes, if I was to assume God existed, which we don't, I'd attritube eevil in the world to the lack of God, seeing he is all-powerful and thus could've stopped the fire. If you can stop a lethal fire from occuring and don't, you're being neglective, plain and simple.
'Would you want God to end all that he considers evil in his eyes?'
Nope. I don't think any atheist ever has wanted there to be a Biblical God who destroyed everything he perceived as evil, as that'd mean everything on Earth would be obliterated.
If God existed, however, I'd want him to stop things such as hurricanes, floods, landslides, huge meteorites hitting Earth, stillborn babies, AIDS, cancer, racism, etc. Yes, I admit I'd want him to end illogical discrimination, impeding our free will. Sue me.
Fallacy 4: His statements about the so-called 'Fallacy 4' is so incredibly stupid and amoral that I don't want to comment on them.