bad2bone #fundie

bad2bone #fundie u4prez.com

I'M NOT GIVING HAND OUTS. IF YOU DON'T LIKE MY VIEWS GOOD,BECAUSE A GREAT LEADER DON'T ALWAYS GO WITH THE POPULAR THING AT THE TIME. HOW CAN YOU HAVE A SEPERATION OF CHURCH AND STATE, IF I'M A GOD FEARING MAN THEN GOD WILL LEAD ME TO MAKE THE RIGHT CHOICE FOR THIS COUNTRY. IT'S TIME FOR US REAL AMERICANS TO STOMP YOU LIBERL PANTY WASTES OUT OF THE WAY. HERES ANOTHER ONE LAWYERS I WILL STOP THESE PEOPLE FROM TAKE MILLIONS FROM COMPANYS. IF YOU DO SOMETHING STUPID AND TRY TO SUE SOMEONE FOR MILLIONS, YOU GET YOUR A** KICKED.
[...]
ABORTION: IF YOUR TO STUPID TO PREVENT HAVING A BABY,THATS NOT THE BABYS FAULT,NO ABORTION,IF YOU CAN'T OR DON'T WANT THE BABY THEN GIVE IT UP FOR ADOPTION,THERE ARE PLENTY OF PEOPLE WHO WOULD LOVE TO HAVE KIDS BUT CAN'T.
[...]
CHILD ABUSE: IF YOUR KID IS ACTING A FOOL IN PUBLIC WHOOP HIS OR HER TAIL, STOP BEING AFRAID TO WHIP YOUR KIDS FOR THE FACT YOU MIGHT END UP IN COURT FOR CHILD ABUSE.

[Read the whole thing.]

45 comments

old comment by Matilde

One of the things I have remarqued about the president issue is that many people, fundies particularly, don't know what the role of the president is. I noticed it first when the petition of reinstating prayer in highschool began. The president is not a kind of omnipotent autocrat that can do whatever he wants once he's in power. He is, at all, a kind of general manager that must direct the country, not own it. If there is a verdict of the supreme court saying that forcing kids to pray is unconstitutional, he can't do anyting to change that. The most he could do is to appoint a new magistrate but, again, with a first ammendment like that, it's virtually IMPOSSIBLE. Same with abortion, the only way is to overturn wade v/s roe, and it's not likely to happen.
He can't also do something which is contrary to the Constitution, because this constitution is what REALLY rules, not the president. He's there just to enforce it and guarantee its execution. If you're a God fearing man, the rest of the people who wrote the law may not be and so the rest of the people you should govern, and you don't have a say on that. In other words, it's like saying that you must pray five times a day looking at Mecca beause the manager of the MacDonnal's outlet where you work is muslim. Of course you could change the constitution, only that the president can't, again, do that on his own. To introduce an ammendment, 2/3 of the congress should vote accordingly. As the congress is far from being homogeneous, it's not going to happen.

old comment by Flatworm

IF YOU DON'T LIKE MY VIEWS GOOD,BECAUSE A GREAT LEADER DON'T ALWAYS GO WITH THE POPULAR THING AT THE TIME

Great leaders, however, do tend to be above-average writers and orators, our current president notwithstanding.

HOW CAN YOU HAVE A SEPERATION OF CHURCH AND STATE, IF I'M A GOD FEARING MAN THEN GOD WILL LEAD ME TO MAKE THE RIGHT CHOICE FOR THIS COUNTRY

Non-sequitur. A great leader would have recognized the alternative possibilities:

-You're a god-fearing man but God doesn't like you.

-You're a god-fearing man but God wants this country to suffer.

-You're a god-fearing man but you fear the wrong god.

-You're a god-fearing man but there are many gods.

-You're a god-fearing man but there aren't actually any gods out there.

IT'S TIME FOR US REAL AMERICANS TO STOMP YOU LIBERL PANTY WASTES OUT OF THE WAY.

Actually, I think those who would target a large section of the American population for violence would be called "Terrorists" or possibly "Traitors", not "REAL AMERICANS".

HERES ANOTHER ONE LAWYERS I WILL STOP THESE PEOPLE FROM TAKE MILLIONS FROM COMPANYS. IF YOU DO SOMETHING STUPID AND TRY TO SUE SOMEONE FOR MILLIONS, YOU GET YOUR A** KICKED.

I think what you're trying to get at here is called "tort reform", and I agree it's a good idea. It's going to take a little more thought than A** KICKING though, I'm afraid.

ABORTION: IF YOUR TO STUPID TO PREVENT HAVING A BABY,THATS NOT THE BABYS FAULT,NO ABORTION,IF YOU CAN'T OR DON'T WANT THE BABY THEN GIVE IT UP FOR ADOPTION,THERE ARE PLENTY OF PEOPLE WHO WOULD LOVE TO HAVE KIDS BUT CAN'T.

If you're too stupid to string words together into a coherent sentence, please don't bother advancing your candidacy for supreme dictator of Jesusland.

Also, it would be more accurate to say there are plenty of people who would love to have healthy, white, newborn babies but can't. Also abortion is not necessarily a matter of convenience. I know, I know- those "librl panty waste" facts again.

CHILD ABUSE: IF YOUR KID IS ACTING A FOOL IN PUBLIC WHOOP HIS OR HER TAIL, STOP BEING AFRAID TO WHIP YOUR KIDS FOR THE FACT YOU MIGHT END UP IN COURT FOR CHILD ABUSE

Does this mean you propose to do away with the entire concept of child abuse? Do you think breaking bones and bruising internal organs is a form of corporal punishment?

old comment by Darwin's Lil Girl

First bit: Just plain stupid

Abortion: Is necessary, or at least humane, sometimes. Sure, if your sixteen and got pregnant through basic poor planning or because your school had an abstinance based program, give the baby up for adoption. But pregnancy before the age of fifteen can cause severe, even deadly health problems. What would you rather do -- abort the pregnancy and have a woman alive who can bear children later, or have both die? Also, sometimes children are born with seveare genetic deseases or deformities that would either kill them or make life so unpleasant it would be kinder for it to never have started in the first place. And some women get pregnant off of rapes -- in that case, you can't say it's poor planning that caused it. 'Course, you fundie bastards try to pin rape on women anyway, so it wouldn't make much of a difference to you if I pointed that out or not, would it?

Child abuse: Entails far more then simply hitting your child if they behave badly. It's generally considered abuse when it gets out of hand, like hitting your child because they come home with mud on their shoes. You don't deserve to have kids, idiot.

bad2bone #fundie u4prez.com

45 comments

Confused?