Yeah dammit! Those countries that don't have that women's-rights ideology (like, say, Iran) are the only ones that will survive!
8/20/2005 2:33:36 PM
If you're going to claim the authority of the voice of god, then for chrissake, at least spell things right: Vox Dei, not Day, you moron.
8/30/2005 8:24:02 AM
You should read the article. It's ridiculous. He somehow links women's rights to the fact that countries like China and India have dangerously disparate birthrates with respect to gender.
Maybe I'm just a deluded atheist, but I don't see the connection between my right to vote and China's cultural preference for baby boys.
11/11/2005 1:22:16 AM
We have the right to murder now?
11/30/2005 7:33:20 PM
I wonder if his mum knows his opinions :-/
1/15/2006 11:12:41 PM
lol Tessa, I hadn't noticed that :)
1/15/2006 11:13:18 PM
So the fact that a society that treats them like human beings is going to die is significant of your sickness.
8/14/2006 8:55:05 PM
The women of America would do well to consider whether their much-cherished gains of the right to vote, work, murder and freely fornicate are worth destroying marriage, children, civilized Western society and little girls
How come they get that right and we can't?
12/6/2006 1:22:50 AM
As I see absolutely no evidence that feminism is destroying marriage, children, Western society, or little girls, I will gladly take my rights to vote, work, and fornicate.
I would like to note that I will not be voting for you, working for you or with you, or even thinking about fornicating with you.
And, hey asshole, this golden age when men worked and women stayed home lasted for about twenty years right after WWII. And it only ever reached the middle and upper-middle classes. Get over it. You long for a mythical age that never really existed.
12/6/2006 1:32:45 AM
\"How come they get that right and we can't?\"
That's feminism for you.
2/3/2007 4:22:42 PM
In fact, I very much like women and wish them well, which is precisely why I consider women's rights to be a disease that should be eradicated.
Nice contradiction you got there.
The women of America would do well to consider whether their much-cherished gains of the right to vote, work, murder and freely fornicate
Murder?! Cool. I choose to kill vox day!
are worth destroying marriage, children, civilized Western society and little girls.
Last time, I checked, those things were just fine.
They can at least console themselves with the thought that, in the long run, it doesn’t matter what they do, because the women’s-rights ideology is an evolutionary dead end, and it is increasingly apparent that societies embracing it will not survive.
Care to support that assertion?
2/3/2007 9:01:45 PM
Another misogynist fundie who should never, ever, ever be within 10 feet of a womb.
2/3/2007 9:42:51 PM
I'll give you three chances to guess how many women (besides family members) Vox Day has said more than a few words to.
3/15/2007 3:42:00 AM
\"In fact, I very much like christians and wish them well, which is precisely why I consider christian rights to be a disease that should be eradicated. [...]
The christians of Rome would do well to consider whether their much-cherished gains of the right to not be thrown to the lions are worth destroying civilized Western society. They can at least console themselves with the thought that, in the long run, it doesn’t matter what they do, because the christian rights ideology is an evolutionary dead end, and it is increasingly apparent that societies embracing it will not survive.\"
3/15/2007 8:31:18 AM
When we like people and wish them well, we think letting them vote is a good thing. When we want to use people as our personal playtoys we tell them how destructive their votes and brains are.
What a schmuck.
3/15/2007 9:54:55 AM
You do not like women if you see their rights as threatening your own. You do not wish them well if you patronize them and slander their freedoms and efforts for equality. Get poisoned by hemlock, jerk.
3/4/2008 10:38:17 PM
Actually, since women have rights, they can tell the abusive fucks that would hammer the bejeezus out of them that enough is enough, and NOT be forced into destitution. AND spare their children of such abuse. If you ask me, when such women are permitted to survive, that is far from an evolutionary dead end.
Oh, and you don't like women. You like what's between their legs. Nice try, though.
3/4/2008 11:36:34 PM
5 Minutes to Midnight
It continues to surprise me that Christians harp about Dawkins not having the credentials to critique religion. Here's some of the big names in apologetics today.
Vox Day: Video game designer and novelist
Dinesh D'Souza: BA in English
Lee Strobel: Degrees in journalism and law
Ray Comfort: No qualifications
Kirk Cameron: Actor
CS Lewis: Prof of english and literature
8/5/2008 8:26:35 PM
May Zeus smite you...
8/16/2008 7:07:21 PM
One of the many times Vox gets shown as an incoherent, hypocritical, sociopathic, idiot.
8/17/2008 6:08:20 PM
Aaaand here it is again, the stupidest thing I have ever read...
How can you first say you wish women well, and then say you want them to be house slaves and baby machines? Would you like a life like that? You try it first, and if you truly like it, I'll join you... Maybe.
I am no woman of America, but a woman nonetheless. My grandmother had the right to vote, maybe even her mother. Both of them and my mother and me were and are working. Nobody has the right to murder another human being. None of us have been more promiscuous than your ordinary man, probably a lot less. All of us have been married to one man our whole grown-up lives. All the other three have had children, not me though, you have to ask your god why he did not "give" me any. I don't know what you mean about the little girls.
The western society seems to be doing rather great on average. A society, where women are granted the same rights as men, is actually prone to prosper, as there are double the amount of people who can participate in the society developement. And women sometimes has other views on things, that it is advantageous to take into consideration.
From the site Vox Sux linked to: "it is no wonder that women who insist that internal consent is the sole determining factor of a woman's victimization find traditional Western morality to be inherently distasteful."
Traditional Western morality IS the fact that consent or absense of consent is the strongest determining factor of a woman's victimization. So no, there is nothing particularly distasteful about it. Christian double morality on the other hand, that is definitetly inherently distasteful.
5/12/2009 12:37:34 PM
RE: "it is no wonder that women who insist that internal consent is the sole determining factor of a woman's victimization..."
Gather 'round, childrens, 'cause it be time for Caretaker's annual two-act internet play!
Caretaker: Hey, Voxy! I'm gonna stick this broom handle up your ass 'cause it will bring me inestimable pleasure, okay?
Caretaker: Yeah whatever.
Judge: Whelp, Caretaker, you raped that guy. What's your defense?
Caretaker: He can't call it rape, your honour. He says that internal consent is the only defining factor of victimisation, a concept he disagrees with.
Judge: Fuck, VD, you pretty much assraped yourself.
5/12/2009 6:39:50 PM
Are you suggesting we follow the example of Iran?
6/24/2009 11:59:58 AM
i wish the world was fair enough to have men like vox who disgrace their gender, just wake up as a woman in a family/community that hates women as much as they do and then just deal with it for a year.
and then just as a follow up they should be made to read their stupid ass comments from last year aloud. just to let the stupidity sink in.
4/9/2011 6:46:08 AM
Aren't little girls also children?
Why would women's right to vote be any different than men's right to vote. At the time of the founding of the US of A, only land-owning white males could vote.
Women have been voting for nearly a century now. People are still getting married, having children and little girls.
Women have always been working, stupid, only the richest have not worked. Working at home is still working, ya know. Before the start of the 20th century, most people worked at home, both men and women. They worked on their farms to produce food and clothes for themselves, and perhaps a little something to sell.
Women's rights have very little to do with evolution. Btw, we humans are tinkering so much with our biology that unwanted traits are now being removed surgically, and the genes are therefore going on to the next generation and the one after that.
Most confident, intelligent men that I know want women who are equally confident and intelligent. They want a partner, not a maid or a slave.
4/9/2011 7:27:44 AM