This is the most vague comment I've ever read. Except for the outright lie at the beginning.
Maybe do some God damned research, you stupid shit.
2/22/2008 7:37:03 PM
There is evidence for dirt, yes.
2/22/2008 7:41:13 PM
In plain sight?
I think that's a crime story.
2/22/2008 10:47:18 PM
"Wasn't there a classic novel about hiding things in plain sight?"
It was, "The Purloined Letter," a short story by Edgar Allan Poe. You clearly know as much about literature as you do about geology.
12/7/2008 12:52:45 AM
Allegory for Jesus
40 days of flooding DOES NOT explain geological layers. Not only is it not credible, it is completely nonsensical.
7/26/2010 9:32:19 AM
The Da Vinci Code is not a classic. Your argument is invalid.
7/9/2011 10:49:16 AM
Plate tectonics and erosion are responsible for geological layers. Potholer already did a great on why a global flood cannot possibly create anything other than a single layer with a gradient from small stuff at the top to big stuff collecting at the bottom.
9/9/2011 9:58:37 AM
>>there is no credible conventional explanation for the geological layers,<<
You Fail Geology Forever.
9/9/2011 11:53:51 AM
decaying organic matter and time. Easy.
9/9/2011 6:24:22 PM
Pluging your ears with your fingers singing "LA LA LA CAN'T HEAR YOU" through your whole scolarship does not count as "no credible explanation".
12/28/2011 12:09:56 AM
Just pull a vague argument out of your ass. That'll help prove your point. 9_9
12/28/2011 1:02:45 AM