Quote# 2906

The point of Darwins book was to prove blacks were uneaquil and thatis still the basis for sosialism.

turbo3, YouDebate.com 25 Comments [4/1/2003 12:00:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 6

Username  (Login)
Comment  (Text formatting help) 

1 | bottom


Thus proving that you never read the book.

10/2/2007 11:38:06 AM


Time for the dictionary, people. The words turbo3 needs to look up (also note the spelling)

1) socialism
2) prove
3) basis
4) book

10/2/2007 11:53:53 AM

David D.G.

He not only never read that book, but I doubt he's ever read ANY book if his language skills are this bad. And his description of OTOOS is nothing but a hodgepodge of stupid creationist lies.

~David D.G.

10/2/2007 11:58:21 AM


Also, spelling

10/2/2007 12:13:21 PM

Brian X

Spelling? Needs work.

Understanding of Darwinism? Or socialism? Also needs work. Not even close.

10/2/2007 12:15:06 PM

you are a....


but seriously darwin proposed his theory of evolution thus avoiding dumbass racist comments

10/2/2007 12:25:41 PM


Wrong on both counts.

Next time you try to summarize a book, try reading it first.

10/2/2007 12:58:51 PM


Darwin was an abolitionist, you idiot, and what does socialism have to do with racism? (Although Pierre-Joseph Proudhon, a prominent socialist thinker, was incredibly racist, misogynist, and anti-Semitic, but I don't think that had anything to do with Darwin.)

10/2/2007 5:24:12 PM



10/2/2007 5:43:29 PM

Lt. Fred

SOSialism. Sir that insults my political opinion! I challenge you to a Jewel.
With Pisstols!

10/2/2007 8:04:43 PM



10/2/2007 9:47:20 PM


10/2/2007 10:47:20 PM


Well Darwin certainly fucked that up didn't he?

10/3/2007 6:33:36 AM


I thought darwin's "Origin of Species" was about finches?

2/18/2008 3:55:51 PM


2/18/2008 3:56:52 PM


1. As far as I know, human races are not mentioned in OTOOS. If they are, i know for a fact that it does not say one is superior.

2. You dont seem to know anything about socialism as well. How can the basis of an econimic system be racism

4/30/2009 2:42:01 PM

Table Rock

Chick tracts don't quaalify as research. In fact I would call them anti-research.

4/30/2009 2:55:37 PM

I read about the afterlife

Someone has never heard of social darwinism.

5/3/2010 7:15:16 AM

A better basis would be to teach everyone correct spelling. We'll manage that, one day.

7/5/2011 3:54:34 PM


If you're going to lie, at least get your lie right. You meant eugenics. Socialism actually believes that all people are equal.

9/1/2011 8:32:04 PM

Quantum Mechanic

Homeschool strikes again.

4/3/2014 9:33:32 AM

lurn ta shpel plez.

4/3/2014 11:37:58 AM


I think you've misunderstood Social Darwinism, dearie. It has almost nothing to do with either Socialism or Darwin, but is a bastardization with Selective Breeding, the very opposite of Natural Selection.

Not all things that are called social has anything to do with Socialism. A social gathering doesn't necessarily mean a gathering of Socialists, for example.

4/4/2014 3:04:42 AM


Darwin, in his life, expressed that other races were the same. it's the cultural differences he, and many after, pointed out as divisive, unproductive or religious prejudice without reason.

You lose. Dawrin was a Christian but not a fucking 16th century village fool.

4/4/2014 11:58:49 AM


Somewhere, an English teacher has just committed suicide.

4/5/2014 2:22:02 AM

1 | top: comments page