Um, you did know about the Superbowl incident with Justin and Michael's sister, right? Maybe you shouldn't be such a big fan of Timberlake. What Michael did, he did behind closed doors. Timberlake, on the other hand, exposed a female breast on live Television!
60 comments
I watched that game, and when "it" happened I thought "hmm, not sure that was meant to happen. Oh well never mind, second half's about to start"...next morning I wake up to find the US has descended into moral hysteria!
You know when you put it that way, the Super Bowl incident sounds even more trivial.
/fully supports bare breasts on the airwaves
Now now, Michael was never proven guilty. We have to assume everything was innocent since there is no proof.
Frankly, that this board would infer that Michael might be less-than-innocent somehow makes me think you all are racist and just jealous of a successful Afro-American.
Oh teh shock. Oh teh horror of it all! Someone made a boob-oo!
Grow up. Most people, men and women, have sucked womens' breasts. So get over a little exposure. Pretend you're European if the thought bothers you. Europeans see breasts on the beaches all the time and it's no big deal.
Only in America would the baring of woman's breast be cause for such hysteria.
"exposed a female breast on live Television!"
It could have been worse, he could have acted out scenes from Harry Potter movies.
Let's think carefully about this.
Child molestation, versus a breast being exposed on live tv for a few seconds, at most. Yeah, molesting children is definitely the least offensive option there.
I mean, think of the massive psychological damage caused to children by a flash of nudity. It completely dwarfs the psychological damage dealt by being felt up by a 49 year-old castrati-esque manchild.
By the same logic:
Beat a four year old to death with a barbed wire wrapped baseball bat in private: OK; give someone a noogie on national TV: a no-no.
BTW, if you have a breast-fed younger sibling, you've probably seen a woman's nipple. It's not permanently going to warp a child.
Idiots: OMG TEH BOOBY BURNS MY EYES.
I mean, COME ON, people. Watch some National Geographic once in awhile.
And seriously now. I've seen boobs twice the size of my own on DUDES. And society thinks it's perfectly fine for them to walk around on a beach without a top - something is screwy there.
No one here (Unless they are Michael Jackson or someone he molested) knows for certain if he did the things he is accused of.
I hope these people never come to Europe, they could never cope with the beaches. All those demonic women was naked breasts,
How about that good clean fun that is cheer-leading, woman at games, dancing purely to entertain men, who can pretend they are wholesome and patriotic, while giving men an erection, why don't Christians object to that as loudly?
It wasn't the breast that was the problem, it was a black woman's breast and Justin is a bad man because he lived the dream of shagging Britney and Cameron Diaz.
Dr. Fishcake - we had the same reaction! Kinda like - was this her boob? Just got a new beer and that was it - None of us expecte THAT much of a media circus about a boob!
Anyway - So, showing a breast for a second is worse than molesting children? Of course, as long as the children are molested behind closed doors that is!
*Insert reference to topless / chest equality movement here*
Supported by feminists, lesbians, and horny straight guys everywhere.
Not teh boobies!
They are of the debbil!
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.
