I dont Have to do that [provide evidence] mot of the public Knows It dose not comply with the Laws of Thermodynamics. and many others.
7 comments
Actually, all of the people who know what the 2nd law of thermodynamics really is agree that it is not, in any way, incompatible with evolution. If you disagree, please show your work. Please note that if your "work" contains no sound mathematics, you do not understand the law well enough to be commenting on it.
>>Adrian
Technically the development form an embryo to a full grown adult does not comply with the Laws of Thermodynamics either.
<<
Yes, it does. If it didn't, it wouldn't take 30 thousand calories or so to go from blastocyst to infant.
__ENTROPY INCREASES WITH TIME IN A CLOSED SYSTEM__ The human body is not a closed system.
@ the quote: the Big Bang follows the laws of thermodynamics too. The Second Law of Thermodynamics is invoked to explain why time has a direction: the universe is going from a low-entropy to a high-entropy state.
The second Law of thermodynamics states that entropy in a CLOSED system tends to increase. Closed system means there is no energy being put into the system. The Earth is not and never has been a closed system thanks to the fucking sun, thus this doesn't invalidate evolution. If it really were that easy, don't you think those crafty scientists would have discovered a better answer?
Trying to refute a fundie with logic and (actual) science, I must be going crazy.
My idea is that a group of seven bourittos run the world and will send anyone to hell who does not eat borritos.
I do not have to provide evidence, mot of the public Knows it dose not need proving
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.