1 2
#344261
Amanda
So they're wrong and you're right even though you both have the same statement? Okay...
11/25/2007 2:43:18 PM
#344263
Prager
And FA goes running into the backyard going "Nya nya nya".
11/25/2007 2:47:14 PM
#344278
Mike
How mature... -_-
11/25/2007 3:02:10 PM
#344283
flipper
I think the scariest thing about all this is the fact that she doesn't even see the ridiculous hypocrisy in it.
11/25/2007 3:04:52 PM
#344322
Berny
Please tell me this retard isn't really Canadian?!
Her posts are full of fail. Other posters try to point out that she is being a twit but she consistently fails to see it.
Sad really.
11/25/2007 3:46:53 PM
#344329
David B.
All questions are answerable if the majority of your answers are "Shut up and read your bible!"
11/25/2007 4:04:14 PM
#344338
Osiris
Even though your answers are pretty much the same?
11/25/2007 4:17:01 PM
#344346
Caustic Gnostic
Hardly. It produces kids with questions that are answerable!
From a retard to a potential apprentice retard:
g0ddidit! What was your question? g0ddidit!
11/25/2007 4:24:01 PM
#344363
You are saying:
a)that questions such as "how is it possible that a snake speaks?" or "who was Caine's wife?" are answerable?
b)that Hindus say the same thing you advocate but they're wrong.
WTF?
11/25/2007 5:00:10 PM
#344370
LabRat
Oh, the airhead.
11/25/2007 5:20:08 PM
#344381
Blackvoice
BRILLIANT.
11/25/2007 5:35:46 PM
#344484
Old Viking
I found every one of my sons' questions answerable: Go ask your mother.
11/25/2007 9:24:38 PM
#344522
Euclid
It produces kids with questions that are answerable
In other words: I can't answer questions about actual science/history/philosophy/sociology/etc.
11/25/2007 11:20:21 PM
#344546
agentCDE
Conclusive proof that there IS, in fact, such a thing as a stupid question.
11/26/2007 12:18:34 AM
#344558
Brian X
You know, George Orwell's conception of Newspeak relied on this idea -- that under the Whorf-Sapir hypothesis of language shaping thought, a sufficiently narrow language base would make thoughts of rebellion impossible. Given how the hypothesis isn't really confirmed, and given how Soviet Russian was a particularly prolific generator of neologisms and slang, I don't think Orwell was right about that, though no one in the Party would have questioned it without some time in Miniluv's basement.
11/26/2007 12:46:07 AM
#344582
Jon
Even for a fundie this doesn't make a whole hell of a lot of sense. Maybe somebody should give him a mirror.
11/26/2007 1:48:10 AM
#344648
Mister Spak
"Hardly. It produces kids with questions that are answerable!
"
Goddidit is not an answer.
11/26/2007 5:56:34 AM
#344675
Nutz
questions that are easily answered aren't often that worth asking. Also, answering requires giving an actual accurate answer.
11/26/2007 7:00:06 AM
#344713
MK
Failing Axe strikes again.
11/26/2007 7:54:48 AM
#344857
Saccharissa
Hardly. It produces kids with questions that are answerable!
If you only ask questions that have an answer, you will never discover new knowledge. And don't give me the "the Bible has all the knowledge we will ever need" bull. Where is the computer that you are using mentioned in the Bible?
11/26/2007 11:37:38 AM
#344921
Mayhem
More like produces answers that are questionable.
11/26/2007 2:06:09 PM
#344948
NonProphet
Wow, that's the verbal equivalent of kicking yourself in the back of the head.
Way to defeat your own argument, Axe.
11/26/2007 2:53:45 PM
#344968
Sideshow Bob
Floatingaxe doubleplusgood doublethinker.
11/26/2007 3:43:19 PM
#344982
John
[Originally posted by EnemyPartyII:
Funny, thats what the Hindus say. ]
Well of course they are wrong."
Funny, the Hindus say that about Christians, too.
11/26/2007 4:12:15 PM
#345466
Paler_Face
Darn. Sideshow Bob beat me to it.
Oh well, BB-Jesus is watching you (masturbate).
11/27/2007 5:19:02 AM
1 2