Home Archives Random Quotes Latest Comments Top 100 Submit Quote Search Log In

Quote# 31745

Biology is the factor that show that the model called evolution is impossible.


The odds that we are here by chance is greater than the number of particles in the universe.

The statement, "That we are here, show that we have evolved" is logicaly flawed, since we are here, but it does not prove where we come from, only that we are here.

Due to the complexity of Life, the assumption it just came into existance from nothing is silly.

Mekelsior, thewaythetruth.com 9 Comments [11/30/2007 4:16:08 AM]
Fundie Index: 3
WTF?! || meh
Username:
Comment:



1
szena

So why do you guys say that the existence of life proves creation?

2/23/2008 12:02:29 AM

POSW

And this has to do with the proven fact that we evolved how?

2/23/2008 1:36:29 AM

ketzu

(What they say, we think:)"we just came into existance from nothing"

What they say about themselfes:"we were just made out of nothing"

5/29/2009 9:17:06 AM

Quantum Mechanic

Evolution is the foundation of biology.

Imbecile.

8/14/2011 8:18:31 AM

Quantum Mechanic

Make up shit much?

4/4/2012 11:31:09 PM

Swede

Evolution is not chance, it's trial and error, stupid.
Evolution is not about where we come from or about the beginning. It's about diversification of life, through random mutation and natural selection.

Biology is not a factor, it's a scientific field. Evolution is its foundation.

Where did God come from? Did he come about by chance?

4/4/2012 11:36:08 PM

Dr.Shrinker

It always amuses me when people who cannot even define evolution try and tell me how improbable it is.

4/5/2012 8:35:17 AM

Quantum Mechanic

idiot

2/20/2015 6:08:47 AM

Canadiest

Always missing the point that the odds of there being nothing are equally as great and the question wouldn't arise in nothing.

And that a state of nothingness is an odd existence to harbor anything, let alone a God. In fact in such an existence a dust mote would be the most omnipotent thing in existence, being the only thing, the only thing that can be said is that dust motes always existed but perhaps not in that form.

Of course, once you get them to abandon the nothing argument since science doesn't state that, then they try to claim the stuff should never form planets. But nebulas show some areas don't and some do, then they claim there's a perfect balance in that that can't naturally occur except science readily explains what we see as predictable cause and effect, then,,,, it never ends.

These are the people who claim their truth never changes but they do insist you forget their past conjectures so they can falsly attribute them to others.


2/20/2015 6:42:27 AM
1