1 2
#348487
Michael
You fail Biology 101. BTW I turned froma fundie to a skeptic. That's gotta count for something.
12/1/2007 12:25:17 AM
#348491
BreeStar
Okay, present to me evidence from the fossil record that supports what you claim. Until you can actually provide one, you will sound like one of the ditto-heads you claim "evolutionists" to be.
12/1/2007 12:30:57 AM
#348495
JonnyTruant
"The only problem is the majority of people are biased. People believe what they want to believe. Many are not even interested in what the facts are because they could be contrary to what they already think."
Do I hear a "Fundie in a Nutshell" award coming? I think I do...
12/1/2007 12:35:21 AM
#348501
TB Tabby
Creatures don't spontaneously evolve overnight. The process is too gradual. It occurred so slowly that nobody noticed it.
In other words...
12/1/2007 12:45:43 AM
#348507
agentCDE
"HAY LOOK BONES" != proof of divine ANYTHING. YOU FAIL IT.
12/1/2007 1:05:17 AM
#348513
484
YOUR SKILL IS NOT ENOUGH
12/1/2007 1:25:52 AM
#348531
D Laurier
"If evolution has been occurring throughout all of history, shouldn't there be at least one documented case of a creature turning into another?"
No there should not.
12/1/2007 2:37:17 AM
#348534
whydontyou.org.uk
Another wonderful example of creationist missing the blinding irony in their own statements.
Yay. Go Creationist Fundies!
(no, seriously. Go away creationist fundies!)
12/1/2007 2:47:55 AM
#348548
gremlinn
Highly Polished Mirror, toward the end.
12/1/2007 3:34:13 AM
#348552
cyborgtroy
Actually, your evidence supports our hypothesis, which is that species evolve slowly over time via the accumulation of mutatations, rather than suddenly appearing from nowhere. :P
12/1/2007 3:42:57 AM
#348576
szena
Creationists point to the millions of fossils which compose the entire fossil record to validate divine creation.
WTF? You think only a fossil of a lion with the head of a duck would validate evolution so any other fossils prove creation?
12/1/2007 5:52:50 AM
#348578
It doesn't because evolution doesn't work that way. You'd better read real science, NOT CREATIONISM.
12/1/2007 5:55:54 AM
#348579
What's your thesis?, you're wrong because you wrongly interpreted my interpretation of your sources? WTF?
12/1/2007 5:57:30 AM
#348598
anevilmeme
You simply do not understand evolution. Plants and animals don't suddenly turn into something else, nor do parents give birth to a different species.
"People believe what they want to believe. Many are not even interested in what the facts are because they could be contrary to what they already think."
When fundies speak, Irony Meters die.
12/1/2007 6:43:03 AM
#348599
Doctor Whom
"People believe what they want to believe. Many are not even interested in what the facts are because they could be contrary to what they already think."
12/1/2007 6:44:19 AM
#348608
solomongrundy
I'll admit it here and now, I'm biased.
I'll take observable reality in preference to folk-tales told by paranoid late bronze age goat-herders any day.
12/1/2007 7:05:03 AM
#348641
Jezebel's Evil Sister
If the claims of christianity were true, shouldn't there be at least one documented case of a christian moving a mountain by faith?
12/1/2007 8:07:01 AM
#348650
Jazzy
In the words of Yoda: "That way evolution does not work".
Also:
"To the unbiased observer, the preponderance of the evidence points to divine creation and away from evolution."
By "unbiased observer" do you mean asylum inmate?
12/1/2007 8:21:08 AM
#348654
Blackvoice
If I change your baby for a goat in the hospital will you believe in evolution or blame it on Satan?
12/1/2007 8:25:51 AM
#348661
John
Ah, so now its "evolution is a change of family", not species or genus. And if we find evidence of a family change, will it become "that's microevolution - how about a change of order or class"?
12/1/2007 8:36:18 AM
#348709
Axx
Reality (noun)
1. It has a liberal bias.
12/1/2007 10:21:32 AM
#348725
Caustic Gnostic
anevilmeme: When fundies speak, Irony Meters die.
I like that. That's a keeper.
12/1/2007 10:52:29 AM
#348909
Jake Steel
"How is it possible and acceptable there is not one change of any phylum, class, order or family into another on record?"
because you are not smarter than a 5th grader.
12/1/2007 5:00:34 PM
#348987
Old Viking
This crap just gets tiresome.
12/1/2007 6:45:28 PM
#349155
Euclid
How is it possible and acceptable there is not one change of any phylum, class, order or family into another on record?
Finally! Huzzah! We have (essentially) a definition of "kind". "Kind" = same phylum, class, order and family.
Wonder how quickly that particular target will move once the evidence hits it?
12/1/2007 10:45:16 PM
1 2