1 2 3 4 5 10 15 20 25 27
#374430
Saccha
And here I thought it was just a website full of insane quotes.
Gotta hand it to them "For Satan the Demonic Teacher" is a pretty kick-ass name in a hilarious way.
Edit:
http://www3.telus.net/trbrooks/perfectproof.htm
There is their perfect proof. tl:dr.
1/3/2008 4:56:44 AM
#374431
Anon
fuck guys he found out,quick everyone drink the bitter koolaid so we can get to the real heaven
1/3/2008 4:57:10 AM
#374438
Mike
Crap, they found us out! RUN FOR YOU LIVES!!
1/3/2008 5:06:44 AM
#374441
cyborgtroy
Why didn't anybody tell me about the secret acronym, huh?
And, I don't like Kool-Aid, but I brought cyanide-laced Gatorade, so... If you don't like Kool-Aid... I brought extra.
1/3/2008 5:08:13 AM
#374446
DinDC
Does this mean we have to spill the beans about Xenu now??
1/3/2008 5:10:09 AM
#374447
Lorelei
Heh, we even have Yahweh in our cult!
1/3/2008 5:11:19 AM
#374448
MysticalChicken
Fundie Rule #736: Whenever the letters S or D are in an acronym, those letters must always stand for "Satan" or "Demon" or a variation of the two.
What exactly is this 4 Step Perfect Proof you speak of? I'm going to hazard a guess that it's basically a strawman army.
Also, pray (no pun intended) tell what "evidence" you have. No, the bible doesn't count.
1/3/2008 5:11:49 AM
#374454
approximate
C'mon....show us your "perfect proof". We can't wait to see it. (and mock it)
1/3/2008 5:17:27 AM
#374456
Chi
Come on guys. Kool aid? Gatorade? We stand For Satan the Demonic Teacher. We could at least have some laced booze.
1/3/2008 5:20:51 AM
#374457
James
We refuted the 4 step proof over and over again. I should know, I was one of the ones doing it.
1/3/2008 5:21:00 AM
#374458
Hawker Hurricane
Guys, if you want to see the proof, it's on his site. You don't want him here, spamming the place up with it. It's a typical circular argument with only 2 steps, but he rewords a step so he can number it twice, and puts in a non-step that he calls a step.
He's either the greatest Poe troll of all time or a loon.
1/3/2008 5:23:14 AM
#374460
cool cats
No, you got the name wrong. It's FATHER Satan, The Demonic teacher. And about being a cult, we prefer the term Satanic Baby Eating, Virgin Sacrificing Cult or SBEVSC.
Thank you!
1/3/2008 5:26:09 AM
#374463
b. beau
Tsk tsk.
Troy again.
1/3/2008 5:27:07 AM
#374466
Anon
gatorade is fine,but no booze,our atheist cult is all under aged rebellious teens did you forget already?
id hate to break the law or anything,thatd just feed the stereotype :P
1/3/2008 5:27:47 AM
#374477
KCAccidental101
Nobody on this site thinks Jesus is liar.
We just think the authors of the Gospels were liars.
1/3/2008 5:41:35 AM
#374478
For Whom The Bell Tolls
1/3/2008 5:41:53 AM
#374482
Michael
"For Satan The Demonic Teacher". Wow! I'm actually impressed that an ass-hat pulled THAT out of his ass!
1/3/2008 5:43:52 AM
#374495
Snopester in Exile
"Step 1 - If there had been an eternity of the past of cause and effects, we would have had an eternity to be perfected without sin, but since we still sin...
Hold up, please define sin without referring to God. (Remember you're trying to prove God exists, so we can't assume he exists for this step.)
1/3/2008 5:58:21 AM
#374496
Chi
@ Anon
Fine, those who've lost their Satan approved fake ID's must have gatorade.
@cool cat
We can only sacrifice virgins on the alter of Darwin or it doesn't count
1/3/2008 5:58:50 AM
#374499
Viva
Yes! We're a cult! Finally!
1/3/2008 6:02:22 AM
#374501
BCD
Isn't this the idiot that spams this site over and over with his "perfect proof." Please don't get him started.
And as sophistry goes, it's horrible - more like a word salad from a bipolar patient.
1/3/2008 6:03:33 AM
#374505
mdk31
oshi-
They found us.
Delete fucking everything.
1/3/2008 6:07:55 AM
#374506
gulagbait
A++++ would call Jesus a liar again
1/3/2008 6:10:17 AM
#374507
Caustic Gnostic
I, like Thomas Paine, do not regard Jesus as a liar; rather, he's pretty much a mensch in anyone's book. Ironically enough, the travesty that identifies itself as "his" book, has twisted and perverted his good image.
Ditch the blood-god of Abraham, and his poisonous scripture, and we may be dealing with a viable proposition here.
I won't be arguing with Mr Jefferson either.
Deist, atheist, whatever -- those gentlemen had broad enough cultural awareness to recognize a good person by his message. Like Socrates, of course; the Buddha; Mencius and Plotinus; and whoever else, by being exemplary humanist teachers, might elevate themselves into the cultural stream of consciousness.
Jesus emerged from the cultural backwoods of his time, ostensibly to save the people from Yaldabaoth, and those people that were supposedly entrusted to carry his message to the world, let him down.
Except his apostle to India and a couple others.
1/3/2008 6:13:17 AM
#374508
Florens
This site is just upsetting. Look at this thread.
http://biblocality.com/forums/showthread.php?t=2213
The topic starter is polite and cautious, much more than I would have been (if I cared enough to register on that site I would've just went ahead and called him all-out batshit insane). Yet this Churchwork guy chooses to spew nastiness and tell him what an awful person he is and how he's going to burn in hell. I also particularly liked this part:
"Seventh, Jesus is more well documented than anyone in antiquity, so lack of historical record is not a viable excuse. We have 45 early known sources in addition to the Bible documenting 129 facts of his life from Christians and non-Christians."
I'd like to know who "We" refers to (him and the voices in his head maybe?) and what exactly these 45 sources are.
1/3/2008 6:13:31 AM
1 2 3 4 5 10 15 20 25 27