Site/Off-Topic Discussion Thread
One day an anti-creationist might surprise us all and actual respond to an actual argument instead of a straw man.
[6/1/2003 12:00:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 7
Text formatting help
I'm not a spambot
5/22/2008 7:35:40 AM
Blatant assertions can only be answered with strawman arguments.
5/22/2008 9:36:52 AM
Great... now I've got coffee all over my screen.
5/22/2008 9:43:22 AM
Well, that has certainly got me convinced!
5/22/2008 11:42:41 AM
I'm sure they will do, when creationists come up with an actual argument instead of a strawman.
5/22/2008 12:01:07 PM
That day will come when you start making actual arguments instead of strawmen.
6/17/2010 3:01:10 PM
You don't deserve this name!
6/17/2010 3:53:13 PM
You're right, we would rather respond to an actual argument instead of a straw man.
So when will you surprise us all and offer an actual argument?
6/17/2010 6:42:55 PM
One day a creationist might surprise us all and actually respond to an actual argument instead of a straw man.
6/17/2010 6:49:51 PM
Allegory for Jesus
Somebody slept through biology class and right afterwards slept through the entire internet.
Alternatively: -he's a 10 year old with good syntax and grammar.
-he is unable to read, due to Bible's being stapled over his eyes. Also: hard of hearing.
-the only anti-creationists he's dealt with are 10 year olds.
-Socrates is actually Ray Comfort, with all of his ability to comprehend when his argument has been contradicted.
-lying for Raptor Jesus.
-he's allergic to facts and goes into a coma everytime somebody corrects creationist misinformation.
-he's actually very dazed and confused creationists with anti-creationists.
I'm betting on the Ray Comfort one.
6/17/2010 8:09:53 PM
You can't respond to an actual argument if there are no actual arguments to respond to.
6/18/2010 5:58:16 AM
Dude, we can't strawman you guys. Your actual arguments are so freaking ridiculous we can't possibly invent an argument weaker or more ridiculous and stupid that a creationist hasn't actually made.* When we respond to the creationist arguments, it might seem like we're going after strawmen, but we're actually responding to arguments that creationists have actually made!
*See Ray Comfort as an example of this. There are plenty of others, but after the banana fiasco, Ray Comfort in particular just comes to mind. I would never be able to invent an argument more moronic than the arguments he actually makes.
6/18/2010 1:50:56 PM
That would imply you have an actual argument.
Love to hear one from your camp.
Your favorite arguments are strawmen as you have nothing with substance or creedance
6/18/2010 9:00:07 PM
Now, I know this is probably unintentional, but he said respond TO. Not with, TO. So yeah, I bet we'll ALL be surprised on the day one of us has to respond
an actual argument.
6/19/2010 1:05:25 AM
your arguments come pre-strawmanned.
12/27/2012 4:42:57 AM
That will be the day a creationist surprise us all and actually present an actual argument instead of a straw man, of course.
12/27/2012 5:44:20 AM
One day a creationist might surprise us all and actually provide a tangible benefit to humanity.
I doubt it though
12/27/2012 6:34:13 AM
We respond to your stupid arguments all the time. You just don't accept the responses.
12/28/2012 5:44:02 AM
12/28/2012 9:49:24 AM
Too late. You missed it.
Also, if you don't want to see us using "straw men", then quite using arguments only a straw man would use, like that the craters on the moon were caused by water exploding out of the earth.
12/28/2012 12:08:17 PM