What is it about comparing broken electronics to primordial soup that you don't get? Instead of coming up with inane analogies, learn of the argument that you are trying to refute?
6/26/2006 12:40:54 PM
Ditto what Redhunter said.
6/26/2006 6:12:12 PM
Last I checked, TVs don't build themselves. And yet a single cell will replicate itself, and under the right conditions it's possible to form the key building blocks for a cell spontaneously. Hence the analogy fails.
6/27/2006 3:35:40 AM
Darwin's Lil' Girl
A smashed TV will not create a new TV. For that, like I said to some other idiot fundie, you need GENES.
11/23/2007 6:52:49 PM
Ever noticed that the evolution is about living creatures? Or are you to stupid to notice?
11/24/2007 10:05:00 AM
This argument must have been thrown at evolution thousands of times. Motor could have looked on any homepage and found the answers.
But I guess arrogance and ignorance is part of what makes them fundies...
11/24/2007 10:19:00 AM
That's like saying I can cut up a human being & expect it to develop into another human being.
EVOLUTION DOES NOT WORK THAT WAY!
11/24/2007 2:04:16 PM
Morbo, would you be so kind?
EVOLUTION DOES NOT WORK THAT WAY!
Thank you morbo.
11/24/2007 2:09:46 PM
Televisions don't breed, because they're not alive, whereas living organisms do. That is all.
11/24/2007 2:11:07 PM
Fortunately evolution doesn't form complex things in one go, evolution is gradual and thus can build complex things from simpler things step by small step over many generations and many millions of years.
11/24/2007 2:11:41 PM
Suppose that TVs fucked and had baby TVs. Suppose, furthermore, that baby TVs resemble their parents, with minor random variations. Suppose that there is fierce competition for surival among TVs, and between TVs and other electronics, so that only a fraction of TVs actually survive and produce yet more TVs similar to them. Suppose, again, that we have the remains of earlier forms of TVs, a whole list of them, and that as the record comes closer to our time, they become more sophisticated and more similar to modern TVs. Suppose that certain features of modern TVs used to make sense with earlier technology and layout, but are largely useless now, or would be more practical if set in a different way.
Obviously, all of this would be overwhelming evidence for an intelligent creator, right?
8/12/2011 8:29:48 AM
Nice analogy. It also works to disprove the THEORY!!! of human growth:
If I took piles of food, mother's milk, and baby food and poured those pieces into a huge container with a squashed, unfertilized egg cell and shone a lamp on it all, would I have a chance of forming a grown human. The same for evolution.
11/23/2011 10:38:41 AM
tv sets do not reproduce. parallel ? not really.
The answer you are searching for is chemistry.
11/23/2011 11:25:20 PM
Hey, this is good! Brand new, makes perfect sense, and is not at all like the Tornado in a Junkyard one. I'm almost convinced.
Well, no, not really. Not by a long shot.
11/23/2011 11:57:43 PM
So you're saying that chemistry is impossible, then? Good to know.
11/24/2011 12:46:11 AM
That's like saying that smashing up a human and leaving them in a basket would disprove evolution, since he OBVIOUSLY didn't reform into a human being. Evolution does not work like that. At all.
12/12/2011 12:44:24 AM
What are the chances you are too stupid to find your own food in the woods?
4/30/2013 4:49:40 PM
Sorry, but your example only parallels a straw man of evolution. Try again.
4/30/2013 5:05:19 PM
A TV is not a living thing, you idiot. Like your brain, come to think of it.
5/1/2013 3:05:00 AM
Chains of amino acids have been seen forming spontaneously. And, since chains of amino acids form the building blocks of...
What was that? Oh, just the goalposts being moved, again
5/18/2013 7:20:20 AM
A TV is not a living creature, fuckwit. Try again.
5/18/2013 7:37:38 AM