["If you honestly think that the depiction of dinosaur-like creatures in art indicates that dinosaurs and humans coexisted..."]
It has been proven to rational, intelligent people, beyond a shadow of doubt, that dynos and humans have coesisted.
["do you also believe dragons must have existed because they are frequently depicted in Asian art?"]
Most depictions of 'dragons' in asian art are stylized plesiosaurs; few question that observation. As to whether they indicate that humans and plesiosaurs coexisted, there have been several carcases of plesiosaurs dragged up in fishing nets, and photographed. Links to those photos have been posted here many times in the past.
Your belief system is based in denial; life is tough.
65 comments
Ah yes the famous plesiousarus in the fishing net. Because the idea that marine reptiles died out 65 million years is utterly critical to natural selection. Look here, those are just basking sharks. The lower jaws fell off due to decomposition and all you are left with is the tiny cranium. The Ica Stones are frauds created to stir tourism, the people who made them claim it and even AiG supports this. The only support for this ludicrous idea humans and dinosaurs lived together comes from misinformation and flat out hoaxes.
Yeah kid, life is tough. Stop that wishful thinking that we're all going to die and face up to the harsh fact that there's a big beardy man in the sky who loves us all and is going to look after all of us once our spirits are released from our bodies into an eternity of pure bliss. Yeah, be a man and learn to face some harsh truths.
"Plesiosaurs dragged up in fishing nets, that were photoshopped."
How did you spellchecker miss that one?
"It has been proven to rational, intelligent people, beyond a shadow of doubt, that dynos [sic] and humans have coesisted [sic]."
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Big steaming pile 'o Fail.
I was doing good until I got to this line:
"Your belief system is based in denial; life is tough."
And then my irony meter just exploded with no warning.
By "rational, intelligent people", I believe he's referring to people like those who run Dr. Dino or ICR. Rational and intelligent indeed...
Also, lmao at "few question that observation".
Actually, there are those who say that ancient peoples' depictions of dragons are based on dinosaur fossils they dug out of the Earth. I'm a layman when it comes to archeology, but it seems a good explanation to me.
Let's see here, it's half past two in the morning, I'm drunk, and this still seems idiotic to me: plesiosaurs DO NOT BREATHE FIRE DIPSHIT.
I almost forgot:image
As a dyno is a man-made device for turning kinetic energy into electricity, I guess you're right.
Oh wait, that's not what you meant.
Substitute 'gullible, foolish' for 'rational, intelligent' and you might be somewhere near the truth.
"Most depictions of 'dragons' in asian art are stylized plesiosaurs; few question that observation."
Please. I'm chinese, ad this is the first time I see a Chinese dragon being interpreted as a plesiosaur.
"Links to those photos have been posted here many times in the past."
Was it so hard for you to at least find one of those link and repost it?
there have been several carcases of plesiosaurs dragged up in fishing nets, and photographed. Links to those photos have been posted here many times in the past.
And every one was proved to be a hoax, or a decomposing whale, or a rotting shark carcass.
Wanna discuss your false/wrong belief system?
I guess most of those photos were screen shots from Jurassic Park...
@Øyvind - Yes, that is one pretty good explanation. There is also a theory that mammoth/elephant skulls led to the belief in Cyclopes (because the huge hole in the face where the trunk goes looks like a great big eye). Our ancient ancestors were most probably aware of fossils.
It has been proven to rational, intelligent people, beyond a shadow of doubt, that dynos and humans have coesisted.
Yeah, and the abominable snowman, unicorns, Cyclopes, Scylla, Nessie and Sasquatch, too.
There are many examples of European art that depict nude tots with wings.
Therefore, such beings exist.
Riiiight.
Gullible. Literalist. Chump.
image
A plesiosaur.
image
Not a plesiosaur. Hint, it doesn't have flippers.
Rational people don't take the claims of creationist con artists seriously.
Cue the John Williams soundtrack:
derr, derr derrderr
Jurassic Park was not a documentary.
"It has been proven to rational, intelligent people, beyond a shadow of doubt, that dynos and humans have coesisted."
Those would be same "rational, intelligent people" who also believe in a literal six day creation some 6000 thousand years ago despite all the evidence to the contrary because that's what the Bible says. Those people?
["If you honestly think that the depiction of dinosaur-like creatures in art indicates that dinosaurs and humans coexisted..."]
It has been proven to rational, intelligent people, beyond a shadow of doubt, that dynos and humans have coesisted.
of course you must understand that the terms "rational" and "intelligent" are used fairly loosely here.
["do you also believe dragons must have existed because they are frequently depicted in Asian art?"]
Most depictions of 'dragons' in asian art are stylized plesiosaurs; few question that observation. As to whether they indicate that humans and plesiosaurs coexisted, there have been several carcases of plesiosaurs dragged up in fishing nets, and photographed. Links to those photos have been posted here many times in the past.
Your belief system is based in denial; life is tough.
it it interesting to note that this entire sentence has only one issue. theoretically it would be typo. he merely substituted 'your' for the obviously more true 'my'. hardly a huge problem
This site shows one of these recent 'plesiosaur finds'. image
Here, for comparison, is the skeleton of a plesiosaur.image
To its credit, Cryptomundo quickly identified the animal as a Beluga whale. And here is the skeleton of one.image
For future reference, plesiosaur skulls have nasal openings, this is not true of whale skulls (blowholes) or shark ones (gills), which are also composed of cartilage.
*sings meet the Flintstones*
Oh, it's funny that we have somebody calling "poe" to nearly any quote. Yeah, I understand they are outrageously stupid, but most of this nutjobs are real!
You **cking retard. I'm gonna send you "Jesus - the DVD", it's got a brilliant cut scene where he rides into Galilee on a diplodocus. The diplodocus then speaks to Jesus in modern English, telling him how he is the great great great grandson of the 2 diplodoci that were on the ark, so he's a bit inbred. Jesus feels sorry for him so he turns his piss into wine to help him drown his sorrows.
As to whether they indicate that humans and plesiosaurs coexisted, there have been several carcases of plesiosaurs dragged up in fishing nets, and photographed. Links to those photos have been posted here many times in the past.
Even AIG thinks that you're full of shit.
This carcass was almost certainly a rotting basking shark, since their gills and jaws rot rapidly and fall off, leaving the typical small “neck” with the head. This has been shown by similar specimens washed up on beaches. Also, detailed anatomical and biochemical studies of the Zuiyo-maru carcass show that it could not have been a plesiosaur. Link
"It has been proven to rational, intelligent people, beyond a shadow of doubt, that dynos and humans have coesisted. "
Lying and illiteracy go together well.
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.
