"I have reasoning that God exists."
No, you have a belief that your god exists, which you arrived at through the specific avoidance of reason.
"Think of it this way; say you wanted to prove there was no gold in China. To prove this you would have to search all of China for gold."
Or you could simply take the data that is known about the geology that gold is found in and compare it to China's geology and determine if there is a statistically significant amount of similar geology present. If so then you dig; if not you don't. Of course that's too close to that evil 'science' for a fundy to want to attempt.
"On the other hand, if you wanted to prove there WAS gold in China you would only have to find one piece of gold in China and it would be true."
True. Similarly, if you wanted to disprove an omnipotent, omnibenevolent deity all you'd have to do is find a single horrendous flaw in his 'design' to show that such a being had no hand in it. Something like Harlequin Babies comes to mind. Now, I know you fundies like to blame such things on 'The Fall' but that would be limiting your omnipotent deity, wouldn't it? I mean really, if you're omnipotent and you want something a specific way then a person eating a magic fruit (which the omnipotent entity placed there by the way, knowing in advance the consequences) isn't going to suddenly cause the whole setup to go to Hell, so to speak.
"To be athiest and prove it, you must search the entire universe for God, but to be Christian, you need only one piece of evidence."
One piece that you don't have. Two thousand years and you don't have one lousy piece of solid evidence. Atheists, on the other hand, do not have to search the entire universe: we simply have to show that your logic is fundamentally flawed and that either such a being isn't as described; doesn't interact with the universe in any way; or does not exist in the first place. I think we've done so wonderfully.
"This makes it more probable that God exists, then that he doesn't exist."
The probability of a logically contradictory entity existing is always 0. Your deity, given the mangled and contradictory description your Babble and it's followers sets forth, fits this description.
"Non Christian scientists admit that there is a gap of time in our world, where they believe the earth stopped circling the sun for a certain amount of time."
Cite the respected, peer reviewed scientific journal you found this in. Otherwise, shut the hell up and stop lying.
"They figured this out by mathematical equations and other things I can't understand."
That's a shocker.
"Anyway, it is in the Bible that time stopped when the Israelites prayed to God, so that he would stop time, so that they could continue the battle they were in, and not have to stop when night fell and be slaughtered the next day."
If time stopped, how did they continue fighting? Other than that, it sounds like something your 'omnibenevolent' god would do. Oh how he loved the slaughter, blood and gore. That was before he became a 'love and peace' hippy in the NT. Of course I'm sure you don't see the contradiction of claiming your deity is 'unchanging' yet goes from a bloodthirsty tribal war god in the OT to a peace and love wussy in the NT, do you? Nor, I suspect, do you see the contradiction between claiming your deity is omnibenevolent and then having it 'stop time' so that one part of it's 'beloeved creation' can go on slaughtering another part of it's creation when it could have simply magicked up a miracle to prevent it all in the first place, do you?
"I believe God answered that prayer."
That's called being gullible and it's not a desirable trait. I suggest you cease and desist at once before some unscrupulous individual with bad hair and a tacky suit asks you to send a 'love offering' to his Megachurch so they can do 'God's work'.
"In the book of Exodus (Second in the Bible), there are some things that are predicted to happen, because of Ishmael being born."
So? The Babble makes all kinds of 'predictions'.
"It is predicted that the middle east will never find peace. Just read a newspaper and that one is answered."
Yeah, that one was a real stretch. You had a few major cultures sitting right next to each other, all of them expansionistic and militaristic, and a limited amount of land to go around. Must have been a true Prophet of Gawd to see there would be fighting.
As far as there never being peace there, well, look around. I doubt you'll find many places that you couldn't say that one about if you wait long enough.