I wouldn't consider a plant a living creature.
30 comments
A plant is not a creature -- we agree on that much at least. But plants are most certainly living things. If you don't consider them such, then you are arbitrarily using some definition of "life" other than that used by pretty much everyone else, especially biologists.
~David D.G.
"I wouldn't consider a plant a living creature."
image
Miss Bianca: 'Dahling, even the Indian Fern has 1260 chromosomes, compared to the 46 of you Homo Sapiens . Does that mean it's a superior lifeform to you, jaelfromFR, you silly boy? Even the charlatan L. Ron Hubbard thought plants contained Thetans, and acknowledged they were alive':
image
'But then, you believe that your 'God' took a lump of dirt and made the first man from such. In that case, you silly fundies are silicon -based, and therefore you're not a living creature, according to your own logic. You silly, silly boy!'
Help you're a rock!
LOL!!
a plant is a self-replicating, mutating, self-preserving, self-sustaining body of order. how much more life do you want?
image
God I hope he's right.
Why not? Plants are made of cells, they are capable of reproducing, they are self sustaining, and they can evolve. Plants are still forms of life.
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.