Wrong at the first sentence, and it doesn't improve from there. (As for why fish fossils are found on top of mountains, a little thing called plate tectonics handles that adequately.)
8/26/2005 4:23:17 AM
If there really was a worldwide flood, wouldn't you expect to find the fossils of mountain goats or something on the tops of mountains instead of fish?
8/27/2005 9:03:12 PM
Shhhh... The straw man might fall over.
8/30/2005 6:54:09 AM
That also explains why fossils could possibly have survived under several tons of water pressure.
6/1/2009 7:44:26 AM
The Himalayas comprise the world's most active orogenic zone. They're still growing because the Indian plate and the Asian plate couldn't decide which was going to be the 'bottom' ... so they're crunching together obliquely, shoving the crunch zone upwards.
Yes, there are shallow-sea fossils all over the Himalayas.
6/1/2009 8:21:28 AM
They are also at lost to explain, why fish fossils are found at the tops of the worlds highest peaks
No, there is no 'at a loss to explain'. Plate tectonics and shifting of continental plates have pushed sea beds up, and have also allowed seas to drain.
And I would suggest you think twice before you call dummies 'dummys'. Moron.
6/1/2009 8:23:59 AM
So, rather than plate tectonics, with all its evidence, your explanation for fish fossils being found at the top of the tallest mountains is a global flood. That suggests the seas must have covered the earth to a depth of at least five and a half miles above present sea level. Bearing in mind that the deepest known point in today's oceans is six and three-quarter miles, with an average somewhere around the one and a half mile mark, your flood would have required the amount of water on the planet to suddenly increase by a factor of five or six and then decrease again almost as fast. Is this what you want us to believe?
6/1/2009 10:25:28 AM
Fossils do not work that way.
1/17/2012 6:41:33 PM
Fossils CAN be made by other ways. We do know why fish fossils are found at the top of mountains. And it wasn't any flood.
1/17/2012 7:17:25 PM
geology 101. read a book. try geology uplift.
1/17/2012 10:34:21 PM
Was in the process of drafting a lengthy reply, but d'you know what? - I'm not going to argue with you. It's a monumental waste of time. You're just too stupid.
1/18/2012 4:50:24 AM
Starting with a lie isn't the best approach, then the massive geology FAIL rendered this reader disinterested in the rest of your crap.
3/31/2012 4:00:51 PM
Sometimes you have to feel sorry for them. There is NO evidence of a worldwide flood so they keep ignoring things there is evidence for, denials the word actually.
Normal common flooding, Tectonic activity, Earthquakes that build or level land mass, Erosion. Not only things that are proven to have happened but are still happening mean nothing to these people as they desparately cling to their myth.
4/2/2012 8:03:21 AM