Home Archives Random Quotes Latest Comments Top 100 Submit Quote Search Log In

Quote# 3375

It is ALL interpretation. Don't you see that? Creationists are just as good at coming up with contrary interpretations of any of it given enough experience with the material. There is no PROOF, don't you see? No evidence, no testability, no falsifiability, it's all INTERPRETATION, all PLAUSIBILITIES against PLAUSIBILITIES. Find all the similarities you want they are JUST AS WELL explained in terms of design factors, or, in the case of apparent shared genetic anomalities or mistakes, by the effects of the Fall on all life. Our genes are broken because of the Fall. There is NO COMPELLING REASON to explain any of it in terms of descent.

Faith, EvC Forum 4 Comments [8/25/2005 12:00:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 2
WTF?! || meh
Username:
Comment:



1
Francois Tremblay

Apparently a probability of billions against one for Neo-Darwinism and against Craetionism is \"PLAUSIBILITIES against PLAUSIBILITIES\". Maybe he should pass his math classes before he makes stupid comments like this.

8/26/2005 7:41:43 PM

gte

except for THE FUCKING ENTIRE FOSSIL RECORD YOU TWAT

6/7/2006 6:04:01 PM

Crosis

<<< No evidence, no testability, no falsifiability >>>

Exactly why creationism isn't science. Common descent can be falsified, it can be tested, and it can be compared against the evidence. Creationism can't be.

<<< Find all the similarities you want they are JUST AS WELL explained in terms of design factors >>>

Except where God got the design right on one creature and fucked it up on a later one (example: squid eyes don't have a blind spot, but ours do).

6/8/2006 3:22:04 AM

The Duelist

Being ignorant of the evidence doesn't make it disappear, Faith.

10/14/2011 3:57:36 PM
1