Let's take a look at this latest pile of steaming tard shall we?
Evolution and pagan religion go hand-in-hand
Actually they don't. Evolutionary biology is a scientific discipline that bases its hypotheses upon observational reality. Paganism is a belief system, and relies upon its own assertions about the nature of the world. Therefore there is no symmetry between the two. But then fundies who need to fabricate fake "symmetries" of this kind between fact-based, reality-based, evidence-based science and systems of religious belief in order to provide some veneer of respectability for their otherwise wholly disreputable assertion-laden, evidence-free doctrine.
since they have the same polluted source.
How telling that fundies use the word "polluted" to describe the natural world. Which points to their basic underlying psychosis, which leads as a direct corollary to their denial of reality. For fundies, the real world is something not to be understood or marvelled at, but to be shunned, trampled upon, and regarded with an almost visceral hatred. Principally because the real world makes a mockery of the assertion-lade, evidence-free doctrine that is their ideological masturbation fantasy.
In fact, evolution is really a pagan belief system
WRONG. Dealt with that above. FAIL.
that rejects the God of the Bible for a "god" of their own making.
Errant nonsense. Evolutionary biology has no "gods", does not "worship" anything (it is telling that fundies always have to force-fit things into their own narrow, blinkered view in order to try and make sense of them), it merely requires, like all of science, that hypotheses and postulates about the world are in accord with observational reality. Which is one reason why evolutionary biology, like all science, is fundamentally different from religious doctrines, because religious doctrines assert that the real world conforms to their presuppositions. Plus, observational reality isn't "of our own making", it is out there and simply exists in its own right. We are a part of it. But fundies always have trouble mastering elementary principles such as this.
Whereas pagans chose to worship creatures rather than the Creator
Which presupposes in advance that this purported "creator" exists, despite the fact that NO substantive evidence withstanding critical scrutiny has EVER been presented supporting this presupposition. Not that this stops fundies from stating it as if it were not only an established fact, but some kind of ur-axiom for the whole of existence. Now I'm not au fait with what pagans actually worship, but if they happen to consider that animals and plants are worthy of respect, then I would contend at this juncture that they are superior to fundies in this respect, who see the natural world merely as something to 'dominate'.
evolution glorifies the creature and rejects the Creator.
I've dealt with this canard above. Evolutionary biology does not "worship" anything. Why is the banally obvious something that needs to be repeated time and again to fundies, preferably in a slow voice, accompanied by the rhythmic application of a tuning fork to the temples in order to reinforce the message?
Read this, fundies. Evolutionary biology is a SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINE and is NOT a RELIGION. I have stated the reasons why above. Pull your heads out of your rectal passages for one moment and use some functioning brain cells to remember this, assuming that you possess any functioning brain cells to begin with.
Oh, and once again, the above presupposes the existence of this purported "creator", despite the fact that NO substantive evidence withstanding critical scrutiny has EVER been presented to support this presupposition. All that has EVER been presented is fifth-rate apologetics. Something else for the fundies to learn: apologetics is the very antithesis of a rigorous intellectual discipline, because it consists solely of the erection of convoluted semantic justifications for presuppositions. Therefore its "arguments" are worthless.
Both pagans and evolutionists look to nature itself as the foundation of life.
Well science looks to nature as the foundation of life because that is where the evidence from observational reality tells scientists to look. But then this elementary notion of learning from reality is another of those ideas that is banally obvious to those of us with functioning brain cells, yet is apparently impossible for fundies to even imagine.
I think that wraps it up for tonight.
