"evidence can be interpreted in different ways"
If you should fall foul of the law, better pray your defence lawyer doesn't have that attitude. But then, he'd have been laughed out of law school with that attitude.
Forensic evidence is clear and to the point, especially when it's all collated by the police, and used by the prosecution - and when used by said lawyer, it can be a sharp and precise tool, cutting away all the doubt, and thus convicting the accused.
It's the Bible, the very basis of your 'faith' that's open to interpretation, I'm afraid. Because it doesn't have a single shred of physical evidence to back up what it claims.
Which is why, if there were a 'Reverse-Scopes Monkey Trial', in which religion itself (specifically the Christian religion) was put on trial, as was that teacher in the 1920s, I'm afraid your 'beliefs' wouldn't stand up to scrutiny. Especially when the prosecuting lawyer called one particular witness to appear in the stand: God.
And you know what'd happen when he didn't show up, eh ChristianSoldier? Said lawyer would then say: 'The prosecution rests'. That's what Proof is all about. It's the one word that can destroy religion, given the chance in court.
