That's right, we have a tendancy to hump anything that moves don't we.
Take away females and we try males.
Take away males and we try sheep.
Take away sheep and we try trees!
oh hey! That just reminded me of a joke!
When Jane initially met Tarzan of the Jungle, she was attracted to him, and during her questions about his life, she asked him how he had sex.
\"Tarzan not know sex,\" he replied.
Jane explained to him what sex was.
Tarzan said, \"Oh, Tarzan use hole in trunk of tree.\"
Horrified, she said, \"Tarzan you have it all wrong, but I will show you how to do it properly.\"
She took off her clothes and lay down on the ground. \"Here,\" she said. \"You must put it in here.\"
Tarzan removed his loincloth, stepped closer with his huge erection, and then gave her an almighty kick right in the crotch.
Jane rolled around in agony for what seemed like an eternity. Eventually she managed to gasp for air and screamed, \"What did you do that for?\"
\"Tarzan check for bees.\"
6/15/2006 5:32:44 AM
Yup...Cause Sex is a matter of connivance and not a matter of love and connection. Isn't that how Yahweh teaches it?
10/14/2011 10:09:33 PM
I know a few gay people, and there have been no lack of females in their surroundings. They are still only attracted to other males.
What do you mean with "Usually males"? Aren't females attracted to the opposite/same sex? We just wait until someone is attracted to us, is that what you're saying?
I also know a few lesbians, and they are also only attracted to other females, even though there are males in their surroundings.
10/14/2011 10:21:53 PM
... not exposed to the opposite sex ...
Oh, sure - you'd like to see me get into trouble for exposing myself to women.
That's right, we have a tendency to hump anything that moves don't we.
"'Cause guys will shtup anything, ... mud ... _________Lenny Bruce
10/15/2011 1:56:33 AM
Protip: Situational sexuality != homosexuality
(although it does show that a strict hetero-/homo-sexual binary model of human sexuality is inadequate)
10/15/2011 8:14:40 AM
Yet, the likes of you lot at Ruptured Retards would be opposed to women serving in the armed forces - on a combat level - no less? Show a little consistency, RR.
For all the criticisms of the film "Starship Troopers" being fascistic (along with the original Heinlein novel; but he - along with Paul Verhoeven - wrote/filmed such as an Orwell-esque warning), at least it showed the Mobile Infantry being Equal Opportunity, via that shower scene.
Moral: Either agree to women in a combat role in your military - thus destroying your patriarchal belief system (and thus your religion as a whole), or disagree, thus destroying your own argument.
"oh hey! That just reminded me of a joke!"
Reminds me of a poem too:
'In days of old,
When knights were bold,
And women not invented.
They drilled great holes
In telegraph poles
And they were quite contented.'
10/15/2011 10:31:09 AM