Site/Off-Topic Discussion Thread 3
2016 FSTDT Awards Winners!!
Help Syrian War Victims
The simplistic answer to your question is yes God is morally justified to destroy the lives of "innocent" babies.
[2/25/2008 11:34:57 PM]
Fundie Index: 11
But god forbid a prospective mother who is unable to support a child should choose to have a tiny lump of cells that doesn't even qualify as a fetus yet destroyed.
I see where you're coming from.
2/25/2008 11:40:10 PM
is this the "sins commitet while still in the womb" guy?
2/25/2008 11:40:25 PM
This person seems to be obsessed with infanticide.
Might I suggest a pleasure tour of the Third World, then?
2/25/2008 11:43:46 PM
fundamentalists delenda est
2/25/2008 11:46:20 PM
The correct answer, of course, is NO. Imaginary deities have no moral justification for anything. Try again.
2/25/2008 11:48:28 PM
And these are the same people who are against abortion?
Yet more proof that, once you are born, you are of little value according to a fundie.
2/25/2008 11:58:48 PM
2/26/2008 12:03:26 AM
How is anyone justified in infanticide? Oh and you also just lost your argument against abortion.
2/26/2008 12:05:01 AM
oh heeeeeeeeeell no. no, he's not. no one is justified in destroying a baby. and what do you mean, "innocent" babies? do babies sin by crying too much? by fetal masturbation?
2/26/2008 12:10:44 AM
Okay, this is driving me crazy.
does "fundamentalist delinda est" mean?
2/26/2008 12:13:15 AM
Innocent babies indeed!
That one stole a car yesterday!
2/26/2008 12:15:38 AM
So when God does it, it's okay, but when we do it, we're all sinners doomed to hell?
I mean come on. Abortion, sex out of wedlock with Mary, genocide, lying (the whole Isaac sacrifice incident)... If God does it, it must be right!
2/26/2008 12:21:50 AM
It's simply one of the aspects of God's love for infants.
2/26/2008 12:23:25 AM
Evil satanic liberal pope nazi babies! Remember to use a pitchfork when you unload yer truck, dorky, it's quicker that way.
2/26/2008 12:28:33 AM
Would you care to prove this or do you just expect us to take it 'on faith'?
2/26/2008 12:30:48 AM
Well, you seem to be quite adept at providing stupid, simplistic answers.
Here's a simplistic response: STFU and die. Not necessarily in that order.
@MysticalChicken: I think it means 'fundamentalists must be destroyed'
2/26/2008 12:34:55 AM
2/26/2008 12:38:25 AM
This guy puts the FU back in FUneral.
2/26/2008 12:40:48 AM
Brace yourself Mike, i'm gonna delve into that whole "thinking things through logically" party piece that your type hates so much.
It seems to me that a lawmaker must be subject to their own laws, otherwise they have no moral authority with which to make those laws. In this country we have laws against rape. They are put into place and (sometimes) enforced by the police, the justice system, and politicians. Does their authority mean they are able to morally grant themselves the right to rape whoever they want with no punishment? Of course not, and if they did, it would be absurd to accept them as a moral authority on rape.
The only way God can command people not to commit murder, and then commit murder himself, is if we label him a hypocrite. This may clash somewhat with your claim of him being perfect, but I gave up trying to rationalise the psychotic Christian god long ago.
2/26/2008 12:46:46 AM
"Okay, this is driving me crazy. What does "fundamentalist delinda est" mean?
It's a play on "Carthago delenda est" (English: Carthage must be destroyed).
After the 2nd Punic War, the Roman statesman Cato the Elder would always end his speeches before the Roman Senate with some variant of "Carthago delenda est". As with many things in politics, if you repeat something often enough, it becomes Truth -- Rome eventually marched on Carthage and plowed the place into the ground.
2/26/2008 12:59:56 AM
Simplistic is right. Your g0d wants to destroy
life, chump. No moral justification is needed if someone thinks they're King Shit.
2/26/2008 1:16:32 AM
That sort of mentality only works in dictatorships.
2/26/2008 1:35:58 AM
I think one should give babies, given that they haven't had much life, therefore opportunity, a little time to stop being innocent.
It's just not really possible for a baby to have already committed a crime, also considering they can barely see, let alone walk.
So, how is punishing them justified ? Especially morally ?
Mike Barkman, thou art a dipshit.
2/26/2008 3:32:40 AM
Then your god is a cunt, and so are you for believing him great.
2/26/2008 4:06:05 AM
Your God is an asshole.
2/26/2008 4:08:16 AM