The simplistic answer to your question is yes God is morally justified to destroy the lives of "innocent" babies.
42 comments
This person seems to be obsessed with infanticide.
Might I suggest a pleasure tour of the Third World, then?
Sick fuck.
And these are the same people who are against abortion?
Yet more proof that, once you are born, you are of little value according to a fundie.
So when God does it, it's okay, but when we do it, we're all sinners doomed to hell?
I mean come on. Abortion, sex out of wedlock with Mary, genocide, lying (the whole Isaac sacrifice incident)... If God does it, it must be right!
Well, you seem to be quite adept at providing stupid, simplistic answers.
Here's a simplistic response: STFU and die. Not necessarily in that order.
@MysticalChicken: I think it means 'fundamentalists must be destroyed'
Brace yourself Mike, i'm gonna delve into that whole "thinking things through logically" party piece that your type hates so much.
It seems to me that a lawmaker must be subject to their own laws, otherwise they have no moral authority with which to make those laws. In this country we have laws against rape. They are put into place and (sometimes) enforced by the police, the justice system, and politicians. Does their authority mean they are able to morally grant themselves the right to rape whoever they want with no punishment? Of course not, and if they did, it would be absurd to accept them as a moral authority on rape.
The only way God can command people not to commit murder, and then commit murder himself, is if we label him a hypocrite. This may clash somewhat with your claim of him being perfect, but I gave up trying to rationalise the psychotic Christian god long ago.
MysticalChicken wrote:
"Okay, this is driving me crazy. What does "fundamentalist delinda est" mean?
It's a play on "Carthago delenda est" (English: Carthage must be destroyed).
After the 2nd Punic War, the Roman statesman Cato the Elder would always end his speeches before the Roman Senate with some variant of "Carthago delenda est". As with many things in politics, if you repeat something often enough, it becomes Truth -- Rome eventually marched on Carthage and plowed the place into the ground.
I think one should give babies, given that they haven't had much life, therefore opportunity, a little time to stop being innocent.
It's just not really possible for a baby to have already committed a crime, also considering they can barely see, let alone walk.
So, how is punishing them justified ? Especially morally ?
Mike Barkman, thou art a dipshit.
Fundie logic:
Every sperm is sacred
Every sperm is great
Once you're out into the world,
The fuck do I care.
Every sperm is useful,
Every sperm is great,
But spill their blood once they are born
Cause its the will of God.
It's amazing how important a fetus is to you people, but once it draws it's first breath, you damn it to hell.
Your a sick, sick bunch of freaks.
Oh, well, that makes sense. After all, human life is precious from day one (which is a reasonable proposition), and God's life is so very threatened by...heeyyyyy, waaaait a minute.
Also, your use of quotation marks on "innocent" disturbs me.
I hope that when you die, you do it in a ridiculous and hilarious way, completely humiliating your descendents and relatives while providing the rest of us a tiny bit of joy and levity at your inevitable passing.
@POSW (444706)
I mentioned this earlier, but it bears note. It seems that the mindset on this is, it's not WHAT is done, it's WHO does it. God can kill a baby, because he's good. EEEEEEVIL abortionists who are looking to eat babies are sinful and wrong for doing it. Someone decks a RIGHTEOUS Xian for trying to cram the bible down their throat for an hour or more are doomed to hell. But a good fundie should not hesitate from clobbering a ghey just for being in the vicinity of a gay bar, harming no one. Americans bombing an Iraqi school or daycare is an acceptable loss. A muslim doing the same is unforgivable. And yet they'll browbeat us over moral relativity.
I call poe.
Not even a fundie would actually believe this, this is what their apologists try to skip over.
also, why is 'innocent' in quotations?
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.